To: | BLUE, JOHN D. (johndblue@yahoo.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88250842 - CANNAWATER - N/A |
Sent: | March 10, 2020 11:15:11 AM |
Sent As: | ecom111@uspto.gov |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 Attachment - 4 Attachment - 5 Attachment - 6 Attachment - 7 Attachment - 8 Attachment - 9 Attachment - 10 Attachment - 11 Attachment - 12 Attachment - 13 Attachment - 14 Attachment - 15 |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88250842
Mark: CANNAWATER
|
|
Correspondence Address:
|
|
Applicant: BLUE, JOHN D.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. N/A
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
FINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) and/or Electronic System for Trademark Trials and Appeals (ESTTA). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form and/or to ESTTA for an appeal appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: March 10, 2020
This Office action is in response to applicant’s communication filed on February 6, 2020.
In a previous Office action(s) dated September 3, 2019, the trademark examining attorney refused registration of the applied-for mark based on the following: Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1) descriptiveness refusal; CSA refusal because the mark is not in lawful use in commerce and a FDCA refusal because not in lawful use in commerce. In addition, applicant was required to satisfy the following requirement(s): amend the identification of goods and/or services, provide additional information.
Based on applicant’s response, the trademark examining attorney notes that the following requirement(s) have been satisfied: definite amended identification provided and additional information provided. See TMEP §§713.02, 714.04.
In addition, the following refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) have been withdrawn: CSA refusal because the mark is not in lawful use in commerce is withdrawn based upon the amended identification of goods; the Descriptiveness Refusal is withdrawn as applicant has amended to the Supplemental Register. See TMEP §§713.02, 714.04.
Further, the trademark examining attorney maintains and now makes FINAL the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in the summary of issues below. See 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b); TMEP §714.04.
SUMMARY OF ISSUES MADE FINAL that applicant must address:
FDCA Refusal – Not in Lawful Use - FINAL
Registration is still refused under Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; see TMEP §907, because the goods are not in compliance with the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA).
As stated in the examiners previous action of September 3, 2019, the application identifies applicant’s goods and/or services as follows: Bottled drinking water containing water-soluble infused CBD.
It is unlawful to introduce food/beverages containing added CBD into interstate commerce or to market CBD as, or in, dietary supplements, regardless of whether the substances are hemp-derived. See Statement from FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, M.D., on signing of the Agriculture Improvement Act and the agency’s regulation of products containing cannabis and cannabis-derived compounds.
http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm628988.htm copy attached herein and previously attached to the action of September 3, 2019. Further see attached: http://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-warns-15-companies-illegally-selling-various-products-containing-cannabidiol-agency-details.
The enclosed evidence from applicant’s website clearly indicates applicant’s water base beverages contain CBD as an ingredient and therefore the refusal must be maintained and made FINAL. See attached: http://www.cannabiz.biz/p-39-cannawaterx-.html.
SUGGEST HIRING TRADEMARK COUNSEL
Because of the legal technicalities and strict deadlines of the trademark application process, applicant is encouraged to hire a private attorney who specializes in trademark matters to assist in this process. The assigned trademark examining attorney can provide only limited assistance explaining the content of an Office action and the application process. USPTO staff cannot provide legal advice or statements about an applicant’s legal rights. TMEP §§705.02, 709.06. See Hiring a U.S.-licensed trademark attorney for more information.
The USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions; however, emails can be used for informal communications and are included in the application record. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05.
How to respond. Click to file a request for reconsideration of this final Office action that fully resolves all outstanding requirements and refusals and/or click to file a timely appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) with the required filing fee(s).
/Mark T. Mullen/
Trademark Attorney
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Law Office 111
(571) 272-9201
mark.mullen@uspto.gov (informal inquiries only)
RESPONSE GUIDANCE