UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 88235532
MARK: FORMA
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp
|
APPLICANT: NOVA FORMA VIAGENS E TURISMO LTDA
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
|
OFFICE ACTION
TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW. A RESPONSE TRANSMITTED THROUGH THE TRADEMARK ELECTRONIC APPLICATION SYSTEM (TEAS) MUST BE RECEIVED BEFORE MIDNIGHT EASTERN TIME OF THE LAST DAY OF THE RESPONSE PERIOD.
SEARCH OF OFFICE’S DATABASE OF MARKS
The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).
FOREIGN REGISTRATION
Registration is refused under Trademark Act Section 44(e) because the foreign registration is not from applicant’s country of origin. See 15 U.S.C. §1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(3)(ii); TMEP §1002.01. Specifically, applicant has submitted a foreign registration from Paraguay to support applicant’s Section 44(e) basis; however, the application shows that applicant is domiciled, incorporated, or organized in Brazil.
To obtain registration under Section 44(e), an applicant must be the owner of a valid registration from the applicant’s country of origin. 15 U.S.C. §1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(3)(ii); TMEP §1002.01. Under Section 44(c), “country of origin” is defined as the country in which an applicant (1) is domiciled, (2) has a bona fide and effective industrial or commercial establishment, or (3) is a national. 15 U.S.C. §1126(c); TMEP §1002.04.
Because applicant is domiciled, incorporated, or organized in a country different from the country that issued the foreign registration, applicant must establish that, as of the date of issuance of the foreign registration, the country that issued the foreign registration is also applicant’s country of origin. See 15 U.S.C. §1126(c); TMEP §1002.04.
Thus, to overcome this refusal, applicant may provide the following written statement for the record: “Applicant has had a bona fide and effective industrial or commercial establishment in Paraguay as of the date of issuance of the foreign registration.” TMEP §1002.04. If applicant cannot assert that such country is a country of origin, applicant may delete the Section 44(e) basis and substitute Section 1(a) or 1(b), if applicant can satisfy all the requirements for the new basis. See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(a)-(b), 1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §2.35(b); TMEP §§806.03, 1002.01.
Additionally, the foreign registration certificate does not list any goods or services; therefore, registration is refused because the goods and/or services identified in the U.S. application are completely different from, and thus exceed the scope of, the goods and/or services in the foreign registration. See 15 U.S.C. §1126; 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01(b). For the goods and/or services in a U.S. application based on Trademark Act Section 44(e), an applicant is required to list only goods and/or services that are within the scope of the goods and/or services in the foreign registration. 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1012, 1402.01(b).
In this case, the U.S. application identifies the goods and/or services as follows: “travel booking agencies; booking of travel through tourist offices.”
However, the foreign registration does not identify any goods or services. Applicant must submit a new copy of the foreign registration clarify the goods and/or services covered by the registration.
Applicant may respond by substituting a basis under Section 1(a) or 1(b), provided all requirements are satisfied for each claimed basis. See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(a)-(b), 1126; 37 C.F.R. §2.35(b)(1); Marmark Ltd. v. Nutrexpa S.A., 12 USPQ2d 1843, 1845 (TTAB 1989); TMEP §§806.03(h), 806.04.
AMENDMENT REQUIRED TO IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS
Applicant’s identification of goods requires amendment as specified below.
The wording “booking of travel through tourist offices” in the identification of services is indefinite and must be clarified. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01. Applicant must amend this wording to specify the common commercial or generic name of the services. See TMEP §1402.01. If the services have no common commercial or generic name, applicant must describe or explain the nature of the services using clear and succinct language. See id.
Applicant may substitute the following wording, if accurate, with the examining attorney’s suggested additions in bold and suggested deletions in strikethrough formatting:
Travel booking agencies; Booking of travel {specify type of travel booked, i.e., “tickets” or “seats”} through tourist offices
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
TRANSLATION
ASSISTANCE
To expedite prosecution of the application, applicant is encouraged to file its response to this Office action online via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), which is available at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/index.jsp. If applicant has technical questions about the TEAS response to Office action form, applicant can review the electronic filing tips available online at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/e_filing_tips.jsp and e-mail technical questions to TEAS@uspto.gov.
/Laura E. Fionda/
Laura E. Fionda
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 108
Phone: 571-272-7897
Email: laura.fionda@uspto.gov
TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp. Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application. For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov. For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney. E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.
All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.
WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE: It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants). If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response.
PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION: To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/. Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen. If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199. For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.
TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS: Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.