Offc Action Outgoing

GREENSTELL

ARESON INC

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88224225 - GREENSTELL - Greenstell

To: HAIHANG INDUSTRY(HK) CO., LIMITED (curt@intuitlaw.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88224225 - GREENSTELL - Greenstell
Sent: January 30, 2020 02:16:33 PM
Sent As: ecom100@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application

 

U.S. Application Serial No. 88224225

 

Mark:  GREENSTELL

 

 

 

 

Correspondence Address: 

CURT HANDLEY, ESQ.

LAW OFFICE OF CURT HANDLEY

19540 BUCKINGHAM DR. SUITE 1

MOKENA, IL 60448

 

 

 

Applicant:  HAIHANG INDUSTRY(HK) CO., LIMITED

 

 

 

Reference/Docket No. Greenstell

 

Correspondence Email Address: 

 curt@intuitlaw.com

 

 

 

NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION

 

The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned.  Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action. 

 

Issue date:  January 30, 2020

 

TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE:  Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820.  TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services.  37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04.  However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.  

 

This application has been reassigned to the undersigned examining attorney.

 

The assigned examining attorney has reviewed the Statement of Use filed in the referenced application and determined the following.


 

Refusal:  Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45

 

Specimen refused.  Registration is refused because the specimens in both International Classes 6 and 20 appear to consist of mock-ups of the mark on the goods or their packaging and do not show the applied-for mark in actual use in commerce.  Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a). 

 

An application based on Trademark Act Section 1(a) must include a specimen showing the applied-for mark in use in commerce for each international class of goods identified in the statement of use.  15 U.S.C. §1051(a)(1); 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a).  “Use in commerce” means (1) a bona fide use of the applied-for mark in the ordinary course of trade (and not merely to reserve a right in the mark), (2) the mark is placed in any manner on the goods, packaging, tags or labels affixed to the goods, or displays that directly associate the mark with the goods and have a point-of-sale nature, and (3) the goods are actually sold or transported in commerce.  See 15 U.S.C. §1127.

 

An image of a product or packaging that has been altered or created, digitally or otherwise, to include the mark does not show actual use of the mark in commerce.  See 15 U.S.C. §1127; TMEP §§904.04(a), 904.07(a); cf. In re Chica, Inc., 84 USPQ2d 1845, 1848 (TTAB 2007) (holding that “a mere drawing of the goods with an illustration of how the mark may be displayed” was not an acceptable specimen because it did not show actual use in commerce); In re The Signal Cos., 228 USPQ 956, 957-58 n.4 (TTAB 1986) (noting that a printer’s proof of an advertisement would not be an acceptable specimen because it does not show actual use in commerce).

 

Also, be advised that the Trademark Act defines “use in commerce” as follows:

 

[T]he bona fide use of a mark in the ordinary course of trade, and not made merely to reserve a right in a mark.  For purposes of this [Act], a mark shall be deemed to be in use in commerce

 

(1) on goods when

 

(A)      it is placed in any manner on the goods or their containers or the displays associated therewith or on the tags or labels affixed thereto, or if the nature of the goods makes such placement impracticable, then on documents associated with the goods or their sale, and

 

(B)       the goods are sold or transported in commerce, and

 

(2) on services when it is used or displayed in the sale or advertising of services and the services are rendered in commerce, or the services are rendered in more than one State or in the United States and a foreign country and the person rendering the services is engaged in commerce in connection with the services.

 

15 U.S.C. §1127; TMEP §901.01.

 

In this case, for International Class 6, the specimen appears to be only a mock-up.  In other words, the mark shown on the submitted specimen is at best a proposal of how the mark might appear on the goods or the packaging for the goods.  Here, the mark is shown on a label attached to a box laying on the tile floor of what appears to be an office building hallway.  The box is in front of a constructed metal frame for a greenhouse with the frame having been constructed in that same office building hallway.  This specimen appears to be a mock-up in that the mark is on a large white label attached to a box in a haphazard manner, only on the side of the box and is not centered.  This is not the normal custom for applying labels to packaging for goods.  Also, it is unclear if this packaging is actually for the goods identified in International Class 6 or if the label for the box was created and attached in the image solely for purposes of filing a statement of use.  Finally, showing the box and the greenhouse frame in an office building hallway does not show use of the applied-for mark in commerce, as defined above.

 

Similar issues exist for the specimen in International Class 20 in that this specimen also appears to be only a mock-up.  The mark is shown on a label attached to a box laying on the floor of what appears to be an office building breakroom, complete with a refrigerator on the left.  The box is in front of a constructed piece of office furniture.  This specimen appears to be a mock-up in that the mark appears on a large white label attached to the box in a haphazard manner.  The label itself covers other wording on the box, appears on the side of the box, and is not centered.  The label was also applied over another trademark previously printed on the box.  These are not the normal customary uses for applying labels to packaging for goods.  Also, it is unclear if this packaging is actually for the goods in International Class 20 or if the label was created and attached to the box in the image solely for purposes of filing a statement of use.  Finally, showing the box and the constructed desk in an office building breakroom does not show use of the applied-for mark in commerce, as defined above.

 

Therefore, the submitted specimens cannot be accepted and registration is refused under Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a).

 

Additional information/documentation required.  To permit proper examination of the application record for compliance with use in commerce requirements, applicant must respond to the following requests for information and documentation about the specimen(s).  See 37 C.F.R. §2.61(b); TMEP §814.  Answer for each specimen/photograph/image provided.  For any website source, provide a digital copy of the entire webpage from top to bottom, as rendered in an Internet browser, that includes the URL and access or print date.  TMEP §710.01(b) (citing In re I-Coat Co., 126 USPQ2d 1730, 1733 (TTAB 2018)).

 

(1)       Identify the particular good(s) listed in the application for which the specimen(s) was submitted to show use of the mark.

 

(2)       Was the specimen created for submission with this application?  If so, specify the date each specimen was created.  If applicant obtained the image(s) of the goods shown in the specimen(s) from a third-party website, provide the URL of the website and a digital copy of relevant webpage(s) for each image.

 

(3)       Provide information about and examples of how applicant’s goods appear in the actual sales environment.

(a)       If sold in stores, provide a representative sample of the name(s) of the stores and of photographs showing the goods for sale in the named stores, such as photographs of the sales displays or goods on shelves with the mark. 

(b)       If sold online, provide a representative sample of the name(s) of the online retailers, the website URL(s) for each named retailer, and a digital copy of the webpages showing the goods for sale on the named website.

(c)       If sold in another type of sales environment (e.g., catalogs, trade shows), identify the environment and provide photographs and/or documentation showing the goods for sale in that environment. 

 

(4)       If the information in question (3) about how the goods appear in the actual sales environment is not available to applicant, please describe how applicant’s goods are sold or transported and provide photographs and other documentation showing how applicant’s mark appears on the goods and/or its packaging when the goods are sold or transported to or within the United States.

 

(5)       For each category of sales environment specified in response to questions (3) and (4), specify when the goods bearing the mark were first available for purchase within the United States, the date of the first sale of the goods to or within the United States, and whether the goods are still for sale to or within the United States in that environment.

 

(6)       For the goods identified in response to question (1), specify the dollar amount of sales with or within the United States and provide at least three invoices or other supporting documentation that show payments or other consideration made, redacting personal or private information of buyers as necessary.

 

Response option.  Applicant may respond to the refusal by submitting a different specimen (a “verified substitute specimen”) that (a) was in actual use in commerce prior to the expiration of the deadline for filing the statement of use and (b) shows the mark in actual use in commerce for the goods identified in the statement of use.  A “verified substitute specimen” is a specimen that is accompanied by the following statement made in a signed affidavit or supported by a declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20:  “The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce prior to expiration of the filing deadline for a statement of use.”  The substitute specimen cannot be accepted without this statement.  For instructions on how to submit a different specimen online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form, see the Specimen webpage.

 

Applicant may not withdraw the statement of use.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.88(f); TMEP §1109.17. 

 

Applicant must also fully respond to all the requirements for information and documentation.  Failure to comply with a requirement to furnish information is grounds for refusing registration.  In re Harley, 119 USPQ2d 1755, 1757-58 (TTAB 2016); TMEP §814.  Merely stating that evidence is available on applicant’s or a third party website or providing a hyperlink of such a website is an insufficient response and will not make the additional information or materials of record.  See In re Planalytics, Inc., 70 USPQ2d 1453, 1457-58 (TTAB 2004).

 

How to respond.  Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.    

 

 

/John D. Dalier/

Attorney Advisor

Law Office 100

USPTO

john.dalier@uspto.gov

571.272.7412

 

 

RESPONSE GUIDANCE

  • Missing the response deadline to this letter will cause the application to abandon.  A response or notice of appeal must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  TEAS and ESTTA maintenance or unforeseen circumstances could affect an applicant’s ability to timely respond.  

 

 

 

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88224225 - GREENSTELL - Greenstell

To: HAIHANG INDUSTRY(HK) CO., LIMITED (curt@intuitlaw.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88224225 - GREENSTELL - Greenstell
Sent: January 30, 2020 02:16:34 PM
Sent As: ecom100@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

 

USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE

 

Office Action (Official Letter) has issued

on January 30, 2020 for

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88224225

 

Your trademark application has been reviewed by a trademark examining attorney.  As part of that review, the assigned attorney has issued an official letter that you must respond to by the specified deadline or your application will be abandoned.  Please follow the steps below.

 

(1)  Read the official letter.

 

(2)  Direct questions about the contents of the Office action to the assigned attorney below. 

 

 

/John D. Dalier/

Attorney Advisor

Law Office 100

USPTO

john.dalier@uspto.gov

571.272.7412

 

Direct questions about navigating USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website, the application process, the status of your application, and/or whether there are outstanding deadlines or documents related to your file to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).

 

(3)  Respond within 6 months (or earlier, if required in the Office action) from January 30, 2020, using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  The response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  See the Office action for more information about how to respond

 

 

 

GENERAL GUIDANCE

·       Check the status of your application periodically in the Trademark Status & Document Retrieval (TSDR) database to avoid missing critical deadlines.

 

·       Update your correspondence email address, if needed, to ensure you receive important USPTO notices about your application.

 

·       Beware of misleading notices sent by private companies about your application.  Private companies not associated with the USPTO use public information available in trademark registrations to mail and email trademark-related offers and notices – most of which require fees.  All official USPTO correspondence will only be emailed from the domain “@uspto.gov.”

 

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed