To: | PAVmed Inc. (gtipmail@gtlaw.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88202914 - PAVMED - 155848-03070 |
Sent: | November 17, 2020 07:12:50 PM |
Sent As: | ecom123@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88202914
Mark: PAVMED
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: PAVmed Inc.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 155848-03070
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
Applicant’s Response Is Incomplete
Issue date: November 17, 2020
The application is abandoned because applicant’s response to the FINAL Office action dated May 4, 2020 is not complete for the reason stated below. See 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §2.65(a); TMEP §§718.02, 718.03.
In this case, applicant did not (1) raise a new issue, (2) resolve all outstanding issue(s) in the final Office action, (3) provide any new or compelling evidence with regard to the outstanding issue(s), or (4) present analysis and arguments that were persuasive or shed new light on the outstanding issue(s). Additionally, applicant did not timely file a notice of appeal and no time remains in the response period.
Specifically, in applicant’s response applicant has requested to amend the identification to solely, “Medical and surgical instruments and apparatus for use in infusion systems, namely, infusion pumps for delivering measured amounts of solutions into the bloodstream over time, none of the foregoing related to use in respiratory procedures or related to respiratory instruments or apparatus” in international class 10. However, the previously attached evidence contained several third party registrations that showed that “medical ventilators” and “infusion pumps” may emanate from a single source under a single mark. In addition, internet evidence was provided showing that providers of infusion pumps and ventilators are commonly provided by the same source. Therefore, the goods remain closely related.
Applicant may file a Petition to the Director Under Trademark Rule 2.146 within two months of the issue date of this notice to request that the abandonment determination be reversed and the application be returned to active status. TMEP §§715.03(a)(ii)(D), 718.03(b), 1705.04, 1713.01-.02. However, the Director will grant the petition in rare cases if (1) the USPTO committed a clear procedural error or abuse of discretion, or (2) applicant can show substantial compliance with the response requirements. TMEP §§715.03(a)(ii)(D), 718.03(b), 1713.01-02.
ASSISTANCE
Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action. Although an examining attorney cannot provide legal advice, the examining attorney can provide additional explanation about the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action. See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.
The USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions; however, emails can be used for informal communications and are included in the application record. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05.
/Odette Martins/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 123
(571) 270-0122
odette.martins@uspto.gov