Response to Office Action

BANNERPOPS

Insignia Systems, Inc.

Response to Office Action

Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011)
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020)

Response to Office Action


The table below presents the data as entered.

Input Field
Entered
SERIAL NUMBER 88200857
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED LAW OFFICE 100
MARK SECTION
MARK http://uspto.report/TM/88200857/mark.png
LITERAL ELEMENT BANNERPOPS
STANDARD CHARACTERS YES
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE YES
MARK STATEMENT The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font style, size or color.
ARGUMENT(S)
The Examining Attorney has refused registration of the Applicant?s mark BANNERPOPS on the Principal Register on the basis that the proposed mark merely describes the goods. Applicant submits that its mark is a coined term for Applicant?s products and is not descriptive of the subject goods. A proper test for descriptiveness under ? 2(e) (1) is whether Applicant?s mark immediately conveys to consumers the nature of Applicant?s goods, or whether consumers must use ?imagination, thought, and perception? to draw that conclusion. Stix Products, Inc. v. United Merchants and Manufacturers, Inc., 295 F. Supp. 479,488 (S.D.N.Y. 1968). To be characterized as ?merely descriptive? a mark must ?immediately convey to one seeing or hearing it the thought of appellant?s services.? In re Bed and Breakfast Registry, 791 F.2d 157,159 (Fed. Cir. 1986). Moreover, in order to be descriptive, the mark must immediately convey information as to the qualities, features or characteristics of the goods and/or services with a ?degree of particularity.? Plus Products v. Medical Modalities Associates, Inc., 211 U.S.P.Q. 1199, 1204- 1205 (T.T.A.B. 1981). In the present case, the wording BANNERPOPS does not immediately convey to one seeing the mark the specific nature of the goods and the fact that they are point of purchase displays. As such, Applicant indicates that the mark must be deemed suggestive rather than descriptive of the goods and hence requests that the mere descriptiveness refusal be withdrawn.
ATTORNEY SECTION (current)
NAME Andrew S. Ehard
ATTORNEY BAR MEMBERSHIP NUMBER NOT SPECIFIED
YEAR OF ADMISSION NOT SPECIFIED
U.S. STATE/ COMMONWEALTH/ TERRITORY NOT SPECIFIED
FIRM NAME MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.
STREET P.O. BOX 2910
CITY MINNEAPOLIS
STATE Minnesota
POSTAL CODE 55402-0910
COUNTRY US
FAX 612/332-9081
EMAIL dockmpls@merchantgould.com
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL Yes
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER 8995.121US02
ATTORNEY SECTION (proposed)
NAME Andrew S. Ehard
ATTORNEY BAR MEMBERSHIP NUMBER XXX
YEAR OF ADMISSION XXXX
U.S. STATE/ COMMONWEALTH/ TERRITORY XX
FIRM NAME MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.
STREET P.O. BOX 2910
CITY MINNEAPOLIS
STATE Minnesota
POSTAL CODE 55402-0910
COUNTRY United States
FAX 612/332-9081
EMAIL dockmpls@merchantgould.com
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL Yes
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER 8995.121US02
CORRESPONDENCE SECTION (current)
NAME ANDREW S. EHARD
FIRM NAME MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.
STREET P.O. BOX 2910
CITY MINNEAPOLIS
STATE Minnesota
POSTAL CODE 55402-0910
COUNTRY US
FAX 612/332-9081
EMAIL dockmpls@merchantgould.com; aehard@merchantgould.com
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL Yes
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER 8995.121US02
CORRESPONDENCE SECTION (proposed)
NAME Andrew S. Ehard
FIRM NAME MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.
STREET P.O. BOX 2910
CITY MINNEAPOLIS
STATE Minnesota
POSTAL CODE 55402-0910
COUNTRY United States
FAX 612/332-9081
EMAIL dockmpls@merchantgould.com
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL Yes
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER 8995.121US02
SIGNATURE SECTION
RESPONSE SIGNATURE /Andrew S. Ehard/
SIGNATORY'S NAME Andrew S. Ehard
SIGNATORY'S POSITION Attorney for Applicant, MN Bar
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER 612.336.4602
DATE SIGNED 08/26/2019
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY YES
FILING INFORMATION SECTION
SUBMIT DATE Mon Aug 26 14:32:17 EDT 2019
TEAS STAMP USPTO/ROA-XX.XXX.XXX.XXX-
20190826143217012756-8820
0857-610d7856a9bab6af07a5
d46351a7895518766372d43e5
4861d4e8ad9b3a16d7-N/A-N/
A-20190826142710142399



Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011)
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020)

Response to Office Action


To the Commissioner for Trademarks:

Application serial no. 88200857 BANNERPOPS(Standard Characters, see http://uspto.report/TM/88200857/mark.png) has been amended as follows:

ARGUMENT(S)
In response to the substantive refusal(s), please note the following:

The Examining Attorney has refused registration of the Applicant?s mark BANNERPOPS on the Principal Register on the basis that the proposed mark merely describes the goods. Applicant submits that its mark is a coined term for Applicant?s products and is not descriptive of the subject goods. A proper test for descriptiveness under ? 2(e) (1) is whether Applicant?s mark immediately conveys to consumers the nature of Applicant?s goods, or whether consumers must use ?imagination, thought, and perception? to draw that conclusion. Stix Products, Inc. v. United Merchants and Manufacturers, Inc., 295 F. Supp. 479,488 (S.D.N.Y. 1968). To be characterized as ?merely descriptive? a mark must ?immediately convey to one seeing or hearing it the thought of appellant?s services.? In re Bed and Breakfast Registry, 791 F.2d 157,159 (Fed. Cir. 1986). Moreover, in order to be descriptive, the mark must immediately convey information as to the qualities, features or characteristics of the goods and/or services with a ?degree of particularity.? Plus Products v. Medical Modalities Associates, Inc., 211 U.S.P.Q. 1199, 1204- 1205 (T.T.A.B. 1981). In the present case, the wording BANNERPOPS does not immediately convey to one seeing the mark the specific nature of the goods and the fact that they are point of purchase displays. As such, Applicant indicates that the mark must be deemed suggestive rather than descriptive of the goods and hence requests that the mere descriptiveness refusal be withdrawn.

The applicant's current attorney information: Andrew S. Ehard. Andrew S. Ehard of MERCHANT & GOULD P.C., is located at

      P.O. BOX 2910
      MINNEAPOLIS, Minnesota 55402-0910
      US
The docket/reference number is 8995.121US02.

The fax number is 612/332-9081.

The email address is dockmpls@merchantgould.com

The applicants proposed attorney information: Andrew S. Ehard. Andrew S. Ehard of MERCHANT & GOULD P.C., is a member of the XX bar, admitted to the bar in XXXX, bar membership no. XXX, is located at

      P.O. BOX 2910
      MINNEAPOLIS, Minnesota 55402-0910
      United States
The docket/reference number is 8995.121US02.

The fax number is 612/332-9081.

The email address is dockmpls@merchantgould.com

Andrew S. Ehard submitted the following statement: The attorney of record is an active member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state, the District of Columbia, or any U.S. Commonwealth or territory.
The applicant's current correspondence information: ANDREW S. EHARD. ANDREW S. EHARD of MERCHANT & GOULD P.C., is located at

      P.O. BOX 2910
      MINNEAPOLIS, Minnesota 55402-0910
      US
The docket/reference number is 8995.121US02.

The fax number is 612/332-9081.

The email address is dockmpls@merchantgould.com; aehard@merchantgould.com

The applicants proposed correspondence information: Andrew S. Ehard. Andrew S. Ehard of MERCHANT & GOULD P.C., is located at

      P.O. BOX 2910
      MINNEAPOLIS, Minnesota 55402-0910
      United States
The docket/reference number is 8995.121US02.

The fax number is 612/332-9081.

The email address is dockmpls@merchantgould.com

SIGNATURE(S)
Response Signature
Signature: /Andrew S. Ehard/     Date: 08/26/2019
Signatory's Name: Andrew S. Ehard
Signatory's Position: Attorney for Applicant, MN Bar

Signatory's Phone Number: 612.336.4602

The signatory has confirmed that he/she is a U.S.-licensed attorney who is an active member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state (including the District of Columbia and any U.S. Commonwealth or territory); and he/she is currently the owner's/holder's attorney or an associate thereof; and to the best of his/her knowledge, if prior to his/her appointment another U.S.-licensed attorney not currently associated with his/her company/firm previously represented the owner/holder in this matter: the owner/holder has revoked their power of attorney by a signed revocation or substitute power of attorney with the USPTO; the USPTO has granted that attorney's withdrawal request; the owner/holder has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her in this matter; or the owner's/holder's appointed U.S.-licensed attorney has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her as an associate attorney in this matter.

Mailing Address:    ANDREW S. EHARD
   MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.
   
   P.O. BOX 2910
   MINNEAPOLIS, Minnesota 55402-0910
Mailing Address:    Andrew S. Ehard
   MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.
   P.O. BOX 2910
   MINNEAPOLIS, Minnesota 55402-0910
        
Serial Number: 88200857
Internet Transmission Date: Mon Aug 26 14:32:17 EDT 2019
TEAS Stamp: USPTO/ROA-XX.XXX.XXX.XXX-201908261432170
12756-88200857-610d7856a9bab6af07a5d4635
1a7895518766372d43e54861d4e8ad9b3a16d7-N
/A-N/A-20190826142710142399



uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed