Response to Office Action

FAST FIELD ANALYZER

Sony Corporation

Response to Office Action

Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011)
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020)

Response to Office Action


The table below presents the data as entered.

Input Field
Entered
SERIAL NUMBER 88199028
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED LAW OFFICE 111
MARK SECTION
MARK http://uspto.report/TM/88199028/mark.png
LITERAL ELEMENT FAST FIELD ANALYZER
STANDARD CHARACTERS YES
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE YES
MARK STATEMENT The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font style, size or color.
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (current)
INTERNATIONAL CLASS 009
DESCRIPTION
Computer programs for analyzing conditions of agricultural fields from aerial images; smartphone application software for analyzing conditions of agricultural fields from aerial images
FILING BASIS Section 1(b)
FILING BASIS Section 44(d)
        FOREIGN APPLICATION NUMBER 2018-142526
       FOREIGN APPLICATION COUNTRY Japan
        FOREIGN FILING DATE 11/16/2018
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (proposed)
INTERNATIONAL CLASS 009
DESCRIPTION
Computer programs for analyzing conditions of agricultural fields from aerial images; smartphone application software for analyzing conditions of agricultural fields from aerial images
FILING BASIS Section 1(b)
FILING BASIS Section 44(d)
       FOREIGN APPLICATION NUMBER 2018-142526
       FOREIGN APPLICATION COUNTRY Japan
       FOREIGN FILING DATE 11/16/2018
       INTENT TO
       PERFECT 44(d)
At this time, the applicant has another basis for registration (Section 1(a) or Section 1(b)) and does NOT intend to rely on Section 44(e) as the basis for registration, but is only asserting a valid claim of priority. The application should not be suspended to await the submission of the foreign registration.
ADDITIONAL STATEMENTS SECTION
DISCLAIMER No claim is made to the exclusive right to use "FIELD ANALYZER" apart from the mark as shown.
SIGNATURE SECTION
RESPONSE SIGNATURE /Robert B.G. Horowitz/
SIGNATORY'S NAME Robert B.G. Horowitz
SIGNATORY'S POSITION Attorney for Applicant
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER 212 589-4200
DATE SIGNED 07/18/2019
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY YES
FILING INFORMATION SECTION
SUBMIT DATE Thu Jul 18 11:52:37 EDT 2019
TEAS STAMP USPTO/ROA-XX.XXX.XXX.XX-2
0190718115237783426-88199
028-6208b7575dd9848e5bd2d
1f34159b87e964509165ec8cf
2a2833ab9cbb36c6521-N/A-N
/A-20190718114920210822



Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011)
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020)

Response to Office Action


To the Commissioner for Trademarks:

Application serial no. 88199028 FAST FIELD ANALYZER(Standard Characters, see http://uspto.report/TM/88199028/mark.png) has been amended as follows:

CLASSIFICATION AND LISTING OF GOODS/SERVICES
Applicant proposes to amend the following class of goods/services in the application:
Current: Class 009 for Computer programs for analyzing conditions of agricultural fields from aerial images; smartphone application software for analyzing conditions of agricultural fields from aerial images
Original Filing Basis:
Filing Basis: Section 1(b), Intent to Use: For a trademark or service mark application: As of the application filing date, the applicant had a bona fide intention, and was entitled, to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the identified goods/services in the application. For a collective trademark, collective service mark, or collective membership mark application: As of the application filing date, the applicant had a bona fide intention, and was entitled, to exercise legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce by members on or in connection with the identified goods/services/collective membership organization. For a certification mark application: As of the application filing date, the applicant had a bona fide intention, and was entitled, to exercise legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce by authorized users in connection with the identified goods/services, and the applicant will not engage in the production or marketing of the goods/services to which the mark is applied, except to advertise or promote recognition of the certification program or of the goods/services that meet the certification standards of the applicant.

Filing Basis: Section 44(d), Priority based on foreign filing: For a trademark or service mark application: As of the application filing date, the applicant had a bona fide intention, and was entitled, to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the identified goods/services, and asserts a claim of priority based upon a foreign application. For a collective trademark, collective service mark, or collective membership mark application: As of the application filing date, the applicant had a bona fide intention, and was entitled, to exercise legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce by members on or in connection with the identified goods/services/collective membership organization, and asserts a claim of priority based upon a foreign application. For a certification application: As of the application filing date, the applicant had a bona fide intention, and was entitled, to exercise legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce by authorized users in connection with the identified goods/services, the applicant will not engage in the production or marketing of the goods/services to which the mark is applied, except to advertise or promote recognition of the certification program or of the goods or services that meet the certification standards of the applicant, and the applicant asserts a claim of priority based upon a foreign application. Claim of priority is based on[ Japan application number 2018-142526 filed 11/16/2018]. 15 U.S.C.Section 1126(d), as amended.

Proposed: Class 009 for Computer programs for analyzing conditions of agricultural fields from aerial images; smartphone application software for analyzing conditions of agricultural fields from aerial images
Filing Basis: Section 1(b), Intent to Use: For a trademark or service mark application: As of the application filing date, the applicant had a bona fide intention, and was entitled, to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the identified goods/services in the application. For a collective trademark, collective service mark, or collective membership mark application: As of the application filing date, the applicant had a bona fide intention, and was entitled, to exercise legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce by members on or in connection with the identified goods/services/collective membership organization. For a certification mark application: As of the application filing date, the applicant had a bona fide intention, and was entitled, to exercise legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce by authorized users in connection with the identified goods/services, and the applicant will not engage in the production or marketing of the goods/services to which the mark is applied, except to advertise or promote recognition of the certification program or of the goods/services that meet the certification standards of the applicant.

Filing Basis: Section 44(d), Priority based on foreign filing:For a trademark or service mark application: As of the application filing date, the applicant had a bona fide intention, and was entitled, to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the identified goods/services, and asserts a claim of priority based upon a foreign application. For a collective trademark, collective service mark, or collective membership mark application: As of the application filing date, the applicant had a bona fide intention, and was entitled, to exercise legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce by members on or in connection with the identified goods/services/collective membership organization, and asserts a claim of priority based upon a foreign application. For a certification mark application: As of the application filing date, the applicant had a bona fide intention, and was entitled, to exercise legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce by authorized users in connection with the identified goods/services, the applicant will not engage in the production or marketing of the goods/services to which the mark is applied, except to advertise or promote recognition of the certification program or of the goods or services that meet the certification standards of the applicant, and the applicant asserts a claim of priority based upon a foreign application. Claim of priority is based on [ Japan application number 2018-142526 filed 11/16/2018]. 15 U.S.C.Section 1126(d), as amended.
INTENT TO PERFECT 44(d) : At this time, the applicant has another basis for registration (Section 1(a) or Section 1(b)) and does NOT intend to rely on Section 44(e) as the basis for registration, but is only asserting a valid claim of priority. The application should not be suspended to await the submission of the foreign registration.

ADDITIONAL STATEMENTS
Disclaimer
No claim is made to the exclusive right to use "FIELD ANALYZER" apart from the mark as shown.


SIGNATURE(S)
Response Signature
Signature: /Robert B.G. Horowitz/     Date: 07/18/2019
Signatory's Name: Robert B.G. Horowitz
Signatory's Position: Attorney for Applicant

Signatory's Phone Number: 212 589-4200

The signatory has confirmed that he/she is an attorney who is a member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state, which includes the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and other federal territories and possessions; and he/she is currently the owner's/holder's attorney or an associate thereof; and to the best of his/her knowledge, if prior to his/her appointment another U.S. attorney or a Canadian attorney/agent not currently associated with his/her company/firm previously represented the owner/holder in this matter: (1) the owner/holder has filed or is concurrently filing a signed revocation of or substitute power of attorney with the USPTO; (2) the USPTO has granted the request of the prior representative to withdraw; (3) the owner/holder has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her in this matter; or (4) the owner's/holder's appointed U.S. attorney or Canadian attorney/agent has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her as an associate attorney in this matter.

        
Serial Number: 88199028
Internet Transmission Date: Thu Jul 18 11:52:37 EDT 2019
TEAS Stamp: USPTO/ROA-XX.XXX.XXX.XX-2019071811523778
3426-88199028-6208b7575dd9848e5bd2d1f341
59b87e964509165ec8cf2a2833ab9cbb36c6521-
N/A-N/A-20190718114920210822



uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed