Offc Action Outgoing

HELIO

9299-5000 Québec Inc.

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88152848 - HELIO - X919

To: 9299-5000 Québec Inc. (trademark@collenip.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88152848 - HELIO - X919
Sent: August 13, 2019 02:40:35 PM
Sent As: ecom127@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application

 

U.S. Application Serial No. 88152848

 

Mark:  HELIO

 

 

 

 

Correspondence Address: 

JESS M. COLLEN

COLLEN IP, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, P.

80 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUE

THE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BUILDING

OSSINING, NY 10562

 

 

Applicant:  9299-5000 Québec Inc.

 

 

 

Reference/Docket No. X919

 

Correspondence Email Address: 

 trademark@collenip.com

 

 

 

FINAL OFFICE ACTION

 

The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned.  Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) and/or Electronic System for Trademark Trials and Appeals (ESTTA).  A link to the appropriate TEAS response form and/or to ESTTA for an appeal appears at the end of this Office action. 

 

 

Issue date:  August 13, 2019

 

INTRODUCTION

 

This Office action is in response to applicant’s communication filed on July 18, 2019.

 

In a previous Office action dated January 24, 2019, the trademark examining attorney refused registration of the applied-for mark based on the following:  Trademark Act Section 2(d) for a likelihood of confusion with a registered mark.  In addition, applicant was required to satisfy the following requirements:  Provide a Signed Declaration, Provide a True Copy of the Foreign Registration Certificate, and Provide a Translation of the Foreign Registration Certificate.

 

Based on applicant’s response, the trademark examining attorney notes that the following requirement has been satisfied: Provide a Signed Declaration.  See TMEP §§713.02, 714.04. 

 

The following refusal have also been obviated:  Section 2(d) Refusal.  See TMEP §§713.02, 714.04. 

 

Further, the trademark examining attorney maintains and now makes FINAL the requirements in the summary of issues below.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b); TMEP §714.04.

 

SUMMARY OF ISSUES MADE FINAL that applicant must address:

  • True Copy of Foreign Registration Required
  • Translation of Foreign Registration Required

 

TRUE COPY OF FOREIGN REGISTRATION REQUIRED

 

The requirement that the applicant must provide a true copy of the foreign registration is maintained and hereby made FINAL. The application specifies a basis under Trademark Act Section 44(e); however, it does not include a copy of a foreign registration.  An application with a Section 44(e) basis must include a true copy, photocopy, certification, or certified copy of a foreign registration from an applicant’s country of origin.  15 U.S.C. §1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(3)(ii); TMEP §§1004, 1004.01, 1016.  In addition, the applicant’s country of origin must be a party to a convention or treaty relating to trademarks to which the United States is also a party, or must extend reciprocal registration rights to nationals of the United States by law.  15 U.S.C. §1126(b); TMEP §§1002.01, 1004.

 

A copy of a foreign registration must consist of a document issued to an applicant by, or certified by, the intellectual property office in the applicant’s country of origin.  TMEP §1004.01.  If an applicant’s country of origin does not issue registrations or Madrid Protocol certificates of extension of protection, the applicant may submit a copy of the Madrid Protocol international registration that shows that protection of the international registration has been extended to the applicant’s country of origin.  TMEP §1016.

 

Here, applicant provided what appears to be only part of a copy of the foreign registration. Specifically, the first page of the registration appears to be a first copy and the copy appears to be incomplete, as the first page contains both English and French, however, the rest of the submitted document only contains French and no corresponding English translation. Further, the second page appears to be a photocopy of the foreign registration and is thus not a true copy. 

 

Therefore, applicant must provide a copy of the foreign registration from applicant’s country of origin. 

 

TRANSLATION OF FOREIGN REGISTRATION REQUIRED

 

The requirement that the applicant must submit an English translation of the foreign registration is maintained and hereby made FINAL.  37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(3)(ii); TMEP §1004.01(a)-(b).  The translation should be signed by the translator.  TMEP §1004.01(b). Here, the applicant provided the Foreign Registration but did not provide an English translation of the foreign registration.

 

TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE:  Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820.  TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services.  37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04.  However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.  

 

 

How to respond.  Click to file a response to this final Office action and/or appeal it to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB).

 

 

/Luke Cash Browning/

Luke Cash Browning

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 127

(571) 270-5767

Luke.Browning@uspto.gov

 

 

RESPONSE GUIDANCE

  • Missing the response deadline to this letter will cause the application to abandon.  A response or notice of appeal must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  TEAS and ESTTA maintenance or unforeseen circumstances could affect an applicant’s ability to timely respond.  

 

 

 

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88152848 - HELIO - X919

To: 9299-5000 Québec Inc. (trademark@collenip.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88152848 - HELIO - X919
Sent: August 13, 2019 02:40:37 PM
Sent As: ecom127@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

 

USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE

 

Office Action (Official Letter) has issued

on August 13, 2019 for

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88152848

 

Your trademark application has been reviewed by a trademark examining attorney.  As part of that review, the assigned attorney has issued an official letter that you must respond to by the specified deadline or your application will be abandoned.  Please follow the steps below.

 

(1)  Read the official letter.

 

(2)  Direct questions about the contents of the Office action to the assigned attorney below. 

 

 

/Luke Cash Browning/

Luke Cash Browning

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 127

(571) 270-5767

Luke.Browning@uspto.gov

 

Direct questions about navigating USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website, the application process, the status of your application, and/or whether there are outstanding deadlines or documents related to your file to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).

 

(3)  Respond within 6 months (or earlier, if required in the Office action) from August 13, 2019, using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  The response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  See the Office action for more information about how to respond.

 

 

 

GENERAL GUIDANCE

·       Check the status of your application periodically in the Trademark Status & Document Retrieval (TSDR) database to avoid missing critical deadlines.

 

·       Update your correspondence email address, if needed, to ensure you receive important USPTO notices about your application.

 

·       Beware of misleading notices sent by private companies about your application.  Private companies not associated with the USPTO use public information available in trademark registrations to mail and email trademark-related offers and notices – most of which require fees.  All official USPTO correspondence will only be emailed from the domain “@uspto.gov.”

 

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed