Suspension Letter

MUSE

Artpool LLC

U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 88147549 - MUSE - 4130-103

To: Artpool LLC (maryfran@aspireip.com)
Subject: U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 88147549 - MUSE - 4130-103
Sent: 4/23/2019 8:00:58 PM
Sent As: ECOM120@USPTO.GOV
Attachments:

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO.  88147549

 

MARK: MUSE

 

 

        

*88147549*

CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

      Mary Frances Love

      Aspire IP, LLC

      Suite 105

      444 E. Pikes Peak Ave.

      Colorado Springs CO 80903

 

GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION:

http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/index.jsp

 

VIEW YOUR APPLICATION FILE

 

APPLICANT: Artpool LLC

 

 

 

CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:  

      4130-103

CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: 

      maryfran@aspireip.com

 

 

 

SUSPENSION NOTICE: NO RESPONSE NEEDED

 

ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 4/23/2019

 

 

REFUSALS CONTINUED AND MAINTAINED: In a previous Office action dated January 25, 2019 the trademark examining attorney refused registration of the applied-for mark based on the following:

  • Section 2(d) Refusal – Likelihood of Confusion

 

In addition, applicant was required to satisfy the following requirement:

  • Requirement: Identification Of Services

 

Applicant filed a response on April 8, 2019, and the trademark examining attorney notes that, based on the response, the Identification Requirement has been satisfied.  See TMEP §§713.02.

 

In regards to the remaining Section 2(d) refusals, applicant provided arguments that revolve around the dilution of the term MUSE.  However, applicant did not provide any third party registrations for reference, and was not able to specifically demonstrate dilution of MUSE for fashion shows, the primary service of applicant, specifically for marks that begin and contain only MUSE as the dominant element.  Therefore, the 2(d) citation for Registration No. 5462419 must be maintained.  In addition, applicant was not able to specifically demonstrate dilution of identical or nearly identical MUSE marks for art showcases, and therefore the remaining citations must also be maintained.  The trademark examining attorney will note that a general weakness or dilution of a term in a class (such as here in Class 41) does not eliminate protection for that wording, it often merely narrows the scope of specific services, and the scope of similarity in marks that may be protected.  Here the various registrants have slightly different services, and each must be protected against applicant’s performing highly similar or identical services with highly similar or identical marks.

 

It should however be noted that Registration No. 4174021 has canceled and no longer presents a bar to registration.

 

The trademark examining attorney is suspending action on the application for the reason(s) stated below.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.67; TMEP §§716 et seq. 

 

The effective filing date of the pending application(s) identified below precedes the filing date of applicant’s application.  If the mark in the referenced application(s) registers, applicant’s mark may be refused registration under Section 2(d) because of a likelihood of confusion with that registered mark(s).  See 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); 37 C.F.R. §2.83; TMEP §§1208 et seq.  Therefore, action on this application is suspended until the earlier-filed referenced application(s) is either registered or abandoned.  37 C.F.R. §2.83(c).  A copy of information relevant to this referenced application(s) was sent previously.

 

            - Application Serial No(s). 79247595 and 87830187

 

The USPTO will periodically conduct a status check of the application to determine whether suspension remains appropriate, and the trademark examining attorney will issue as needed an inquiry letter to applicant regarding the status of the matter on which suspension is based.  TMEP §§716.04, 716.05.  Applicant will be notified when suspension is no longer appropriate.  See TMEP §716.04.

 

No response to this notice is necessary; however, if applicant wants to respond, applicant should use the “Response to Suspension Inquiry or Letter of Suspension” form online at http://teasroa.gov.uspto.report/rsi/rsi.

 

 

 

/benjaminrosen/

Benjamin Rosen

Examining Attorney

Law Office 120

(571) 272-8425

benjamin.rosen@uspto.gov

 

PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION:  To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/.  Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen.  If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199.  For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.

 

TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS:  Use the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.

 

 

U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 88147549 - MUSE - 4130-103

To: Artpool LLC (maryfran@aspireip.com)
Subject: U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 88147549 - MUSE - 4130-103
Sent: 4/23/2019 8:00:59 PM
Sent As: ECOM120@USPTO.GOV
Attachments:

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

 

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING YOUR

U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

USPTO OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) HAS ISSUED

ON 4/23/2019 FOR U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO.88147549

 

Please follow the instructions below:

 

(1)  TO READ THE LETTER:  Click on this link or go to http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/, enter the U.S. application serial number, and click on “Documents.”

 

The Office action may not be immediately viewable, to allow for necessary system updates of the application, but will be available within 24 hours of this e-mail notification.

 

(2)  QUESTIONS:  For questions about the contents of the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney.  For technical assistance in accessing or viewing the Office action in the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system, please e-mail TSDR@uspto.gov.

 

WARNING

 

PRIVATE COMPANY SOLICITATIONS REGARDING YOUR APPLICATION:  Private companies not associated with the USPTO are using information provided in trademark applications to mail or e-mail trademark-related solicitations.  These companies often use names that closely resemble the USPTO and their solicitations may look like an official government document.  Many solicitations require that you pay “fees.” 

 

Please carefully review all correspondence you receive regarding this application to make sure that you are responding to an official document from the USPTO rather than a private company solicitation.  All official USPTO correspondence will be mailed only from the “United States Patent and Trademark Office” in Alexandria, VA; or sent by e-mail from the domain “@uspto.gov.”  For more information on how to handle private company solicitations, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/solicitation_warnings.jsp.

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed