Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
PTO Form 1960 (Rev 10/2011) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020) |
Request for Reconsideration after Final Action
The table below presents the data as entered.
Input Field
|
Entered
|
SERIAL NUMBER |
88134288 |
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED |
LAW OFFICE 100 |
MARK SECTION |
MARK |
mark |
LITERAL ELEMENT |
KANE |
STANDARD CHARACTERS |
YES |
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE |
YES |
MARK STATEMENT |
The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font style, size or color. |
OWNER SECTION (current) |
NAME |
The Kane Company, Inc. |
MAILING ADDRESS |
210 Commerce Way, Suite 300 |
CITY |
Portsmouth |
STATE |
New Hampshire |
ZIP/POSTAL CODE |
03801 |
COUNTRY/REGION/JURISDICTION/U.S. TERRITORY |
United States |
OWNER SECTION (proposed) |
NAME |
The Kane Company, Inc. |
MAILING ADDRESS |
210 Commerce Way, Suite 300 |
CITY |
Portsmouth |
STATE |
New Hampshire |
ZIP/POSTAL CODE |
03801 |
COUNTRY/REGION/JURISDICTION/U.S. TERRITORY |
United States |
EMAIL |
XXXX |
ARGUMENT(S) |
The Examining Attorney has maintained the refusal of this application under Section 2(d), citing a likelihood of confusion with Reg. No. 5259738
for the mark CAIN BROTHERS. Applicant disagrees with the Examining Attorney's position, and reiterates the arguments set forth in its prior response as to why there is no likelihood of confusion in
this case. Among other things, confusion is unlikely due to the dissimilarities between the marks as a whole, the high degree of care and analysis that consumers will apply to their decisions to
purchase the parties' services, and the more than 35 years of the marks' coexistence in the marketplace without any actual confusion. Applicant now submits a Consent Agreement that it has entered
into with KeyCorp, owner of Reg. No. 5259738. As indicated in the Consent Agreement, the parties believe that confusion between their marks is unlikely for the aforementioned reasons. Moreover, the
Consent Agreement reflects the parties' commitment to cooperate with each other as necessary to minimize the likelihood of confusion and, in the unlikely event that either party becomes aware of any
actual confusion, to take steps to promptly address such confusion and prevent its future occurrence. The Federal Circuit has made it clear that the PTO should give "substantial weight" to the
parties' assessment of likelihood of confusion in a consent agreement. See In re Four Seasons Hotels Ltd., 987 F.2d 1565, 1569 (1993) ("The parties themselves have determined that confusion of the
public by concurrent use of their marks is unlikely and intend to abide by their contractual agreement. . . . There is no reason to ignore their assessment of likelihood of confusion and not give
substantial weight to their agreement as evidence that likelihood of confusion does not exist."); In re. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357 (C.C.P.A. 1973); TMEP Sec. 1207.01(d)(viii).
For the reasons set forth above, Applicant respectfully requests that the Section 2(d) refusal be withdrawn and the application be approved for publication. |
EVIDENCE SECTION |
EVIDENCE FILE NAME(S) |
ORIGINAL PDF FILE |
evi_6949136242-2020031211 4944658821_._Executed_Con
sent_Agreement.pdf |
CONVERTED PDF FILE(S)
(2 pages) |
\\TICRS\EXPORT18\IMAGEOUT 18\881\342\88134288\xml1\ RFR0002.JPG |
|
\\TICRS\EXPORT18\IMAGEOUT 18\881\342\88134288\xml1\ RFR0003.JPG |
DESCRIPTION OF EVIDENCE FILE |
Executed Consent Agreement |
ATTORNEY INFORMATION (current) |
NAME |
Jonathan M. Gelchinsky |
ATTORNEY BAR MEMBERSHIP NUMBER |
NOT SPECIFIED |
YEAR OF ADMISSION |
NOT SPECIFIED |
U.S. STATE/ COMMONWEALTH/ TERRITORY |
NOT SPECIFIED |
FIRM NAME |
PIERCE ATWOOD LLP |
STREET |
254 COMMERCIAL STREET |
CITY |
PORTLAND |
STATE |
Maine |
POSTAL CODE |
04101 |
COUNTRY/REGION/JURISDICTION/U.S. TERRITORY |
United States |
PHONE |
207-791-1100 |
FAX |
207-791-1350 |
EMAIL |
trademark@pierceatwood.com |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER |
35123/2528 |
ATTORNEY INFORMATION (proposed) |
NAME |
Jonathan M. Gelchinsky |
ATTORNEY BAR MEMBERSHIP NUMBER |
XXX |
YEAR OF ADMISSION |
XXXX |
U.S. STATE/ COMMONWEALTH/ TERRITORY |
XX |
FIRM NAME |
Pierce Atwood LLP |
STREET |
254 Commercial Street |
CITY |
Portland |
STATE |
Maine |
POSTAL CODE |
04101 |
COUNTRY/REGION/JURISDICTION/U.S. TERRITORY |
United States |
PHONE |
207-791-1100 |
FAX |
207-791-1350 |
EMAIL |
trademark@pierceatwood.com |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER |
35123/2528K |
OTHER APPOINTED ATTORNEY |
each of the attorneys of Pierce Atwood LLP |
CORRESPONDENCE INFORMATION (current) |
NAME |
JONATHAN M. GELCHINSKY |
PRIMARY EMAIL ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE |
trademark@pierceatwood.com |
SECONDARY EMAIL ADDRESS(ES) (COURTESY COPIES) |
NOT PROVIDED |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER |
35123/2528 |
CORRESPONDENCE INFORMATION (proposed) |
NAME |
Jonathan M. Gelchinsky |
PRIMARY EMAIL ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE |
trademark@pierceatwood.com |
SECONDARY EMAIL ADDRESS(ES) (COURTESY COPIES) |
NOT PROVIDED |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER |
35123/2528K |
SIGNATURE SECTION |
RESPONSE SIGNATURE |
/JMG/ |
SIGNATORY'S NAME |
Jonathan M. Gelchinsky |
SIGNATORY'S POSITION |
Attorney of record, Maine bar member |
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER |
207-791-1100 |
DATE SIGNED |
03/12/2020 |
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY |
YES |
CONCURRENT APPEAL NOTICE FILED |
NO |
FILING INFORMATION SECTION |
SUBMIT DATE |
Thu Mar 12 15:38:46 ET 2020 |
TEAS STAMP |
USPTO/RFR-XX.XX.XXX.XXX-2
0200312153846236487-88134
288-7103f2cb4cb3852541948
8b9b7da92b3195513835bb4b9
deea1d07396c332ffd6d6-N/A
-N/A-20200312121838044369 |
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
PTO Form 1960 (Rev 10/2011) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020) |
Request for Reconsideration after Final Action
To the Commissioner for Trademarks:
Application serial no.
88134288 KANE(Standard Characters, see http://uspto.report/TM/88134288/mark.png) has been amended as follows:
ARGUMENT(S)
In response to the substantive refusal(s), please note the following:
The Examining Attorney has maintained the refusal of this application under Section 2(d), citing a likelihood of confusion with Reg. No. 5259738 for the mark CAIN BROTHERS. Applicant disagrees with
the Examining Attorney's position, and reiterates the arguments set forth in its prior response as to why there is no likelihood of confusion in this case. Among other things, confusion is unlikely
due to the dissimilarities between the marks as a whole, the high degree of care and analysis that consumers will apply to their decisions to purchase the parties' services, and the more than 35
years of the marks' coexistence in the marketplace without any actual confusion. Applicant now submits a Consent Agreement that it has entered into with KeyCorp, owner of Reg. No. 5259738. As
indicated in the Consent Agreement, the parties believe that confusion between their marks is unlikely for the aforementioned reasons. Moreover, the Consent Agreement reflects the parties' commitment
to cooperate with each other as necessary to minimize the likelihood of confusion and, in the unlikely event that either party becomes aware of any actual confusion, to take steps to promptly address
such confusion and prevent its future occurrence. The Federal Circuit has made it clear that the PTO should give "substantial weight" to the parties' assessment of likelihood of confusion in a
consent agreement. See In re Four Seasons Hotels Ltd., 987 F.2d 1565, 1569 (1993) ("The parties themselves have determined that confusion of the public by concurrent use of their marks is unlikely
and intend to abide by their contractual agreement. . . . There is no reason to ignore their assessment of likelihood of confusion and not give substantial weight to their agreement as evidence that
likelihood of confusion does not exist."); In re. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357 (C.C.P.A. 1973); TMEP Sec. 1207.01(d)(viii). For the reasons set forth above, Applicant
respectfully requests that the Section 2(d) refusal be withdrawn and the application be approved for publication.
EVIDENCE
Evidence has been attached: Executed Consent Agreement
Original PDF file:
evi_6949136242-2020031211 4944658821_._Executed_Con
sent_Agreement.pdf
Converted PDF file(s) ( 2 pages)
Evidence-1Evidence-2
OWNER AND/OR ENTITY INFORMATION
Applicant proposes to amend the following:
Current: The Kane Company, Inc., a corporation of New Hampshire, having an address of
210 Commerce Way, Suite 300
Portsmouth, New Hampshire 03801
United States
Proposed: The Kane Company, Inc., a corporation of New Hampshire, having an address of
210 Commerce Way, Suite 300
Portsmouth, New Hampshire 03801
United States
Email Address: XXXX
The owner's/holder's current attorney information: Jonathan M. Gelchinsky. Jonathan M. Gelchinsky of PIERCE ATWOOD LLP, is located at
254 COMMERCIAL STREET
PORTLAND, Maine 04101
United States
The docket/reference number is 35123/2528.
The phone number is 207-791-1100.
The fax number is 207-791-1350.
The email address is trademark@pierceatwood.com
The owner's/holder's proposed attorney information: Jonathan M. Gelchinsky. Other appointed attorneys are each of the attorneys of Pierce Atwood LLP. Jonathan M. Gelchinsky of Pierce Atwood LLP,
is a member of the XX bar, admitted to the bar in XXXX, bar membership no. XXX, and the attorney(s) is located at
254 Commercial Street
Portland, Maine 04101
United States
The docket/reference number is 35123/2528K.
The phone number is 207-791-1100.
The fax number is 207-791-1350.
The email address is trademark@pierceatwood.com
Jonathan M. Gelchinsky submitted the following statement: The attorney of record is an active member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state, the District of Columbia, or any
U.S. Commonwealth or territory.
Correspondence Information (current):
JONATHAN M. GELCHINSKY
PRIMARY EMAIL FOR CORRESPONDENCE: trademark@pierceatwood.com
SECONDARY EMAIL ADDRESS(ES) (COURTESY COPIES): NOT PROVIDED
The docket/reference number is 35123/2528.
Correspondence Information (proposed):
Jonathan M. Gelchinsky
PRIMARY EMAIL FOR CORRESPONDENCE: trademark@pierceatwood.com
SECONDARY EMAIL ADDRESS(ES) (COURTESY COPIES): NOT PROVIDED
The docket/reference number is 35123/2528K.
Requirement for Email and Electronic Filing: I understand that a valid email address must be maintained by the owner/holder and the owner's/holder's attorney, if appointed, and that all
official trademark correspondence must be submitted via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).
SIGNATURE(S)
Request for Reconsideration Signature
Signature: /JMG/ Date: 03/12/2020
Signatory's Name: Jonathan M. Gelchinsky
Signatory's Position: Attorney of record, Maine bar member
Signatory's Phone Number: 207-791-1100
The signatory has confirmed that he/she is a U.S.-licensed attorney who is an active member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state (including the District of Columbia and
any U.S. Commonwealth or territory); and he/she is currently the owner's/holder's attorney or an associate thereof; and to the best of his/her knowledge, if prior to his/her appointment another
U.S.-licensed attorney not currently associated with his/her company/firm previously represented the owner/holder in this matter: the owner/holder has revoked their power of attorney by a signed
revocation or substitute power of attorney with the USPTO; the USPTO has granted that attorney's withdrawal request; the owner/holder has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her in this matter;
or the owner's/holder's appointed U.S.-licensed attorney has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her as an associate attorney in this matter.
The applicant is not filing a Notice of Appeal in conjunction with this Request for Reconsideration.
Mailing Address: JONATHAN M. GELCHINSKY
PIERCE ATWOOD LLP
254 COMMERCIAL STREET
PORTLAND, Maine 04101
Mailing Address: Jonathan M. Gelchinsky
Pierce Atwood LLP
254 Commercial Street
Portland, Maine 04101
Serial Number: 88134288
Internet Transmission Date: Thu Mar 12 15:38:46 ET 2020
TEAS Stamp: USPTO/RFR-XX.XX.XXX.XXX-2020031215384623
6487-88134288-7103f2cb4cb38525419488b9b7
da92b3195513835bb4b9deea1d07396c332ffd6d
6-N/A-N/A-20200312121838044369