To: | CABOT CORPORATION (mary.porter@cabotcorp.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88127660 - ENDURE - ENDURE |
Sent: | November 09, 2019 08:28:17 AM |
Sent As: | ecom100@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88127660
Mark: ENDURE
|
|
Correspondence Address:
|
|
Applicant: CABOT CORPORATION
|
|
Reference/Docket No. ENDURE
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
Issue date: November 09, 2019
Notice of Incomplete Response – Response Not Signed by a Proper Party
Deadline for responding to this notice. To avoid abandonment of the application, the USPTO must receive a properly signed response within either (1) thirty days from the issue date above, or (2) the time remaining in the six-month period for responding to the previous Office action, whichever is longer. TMEP §712.03; see 37 C.F.R. §2.65(a)(2).
Response is not signed by a proper party and cannot be accepted. Applicant filed a response on July 31, 2019 that was signed by Mary E. Porter, who does not appear to be an authorized attorney and thus does not have authority to sign on behalf of applicant. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.17(a), 2.62(b). The USPTO cannot accept a response signed by an improper party; therefore, the contents will not be reviewed. See 37 C.F.R. §2.62(b); TMEP §718.03.
In this case, the signer identifies herself as “attorney-in-fact,” which is a title that identifies an individual that is presumed to be unauthorized to represent an applicant. TMEP §611.04.
Response options for this notice. Applicant must submit one of the following:
(1) The entire response form, signed by a proper party;
(2) A written statement that (a) the signer is a U.S.-licensed attorney authorized to practice under 37 C.F.R. §11.14(a), and (b) is in good standing with a bar of the highest court of a U.S. state or territory; (c) specifies the jurisdiction in which the attorney is admitted, the date of admission, and the bar license number, if one is issued; and (d) provides the attorney’s postal and email addresses; or
(3) A written statement that the signer is a Canadian trademark attorney or agent reciprocally recognized by the USPTO’s Office of Enrollment and Discipline (OED) under 37 C.F.R. §11.14(c)(1).
See 37 C.F.R. §§2.17(a), (b)(3), (e), 2.62(b).
Click to respond to a previous nonfinal Office action. See below for information about who can sign a response.
Who can sign the response.
Applicant does not have an attorney. The response must be signed by (1) the individual applicant, (2) someone with legal authority to bind a juristic applicant (e.g., a corporate officer of a corporation, or a general partner of a partnership), or (3) all joint applicants. See 37 C.F.R. §2.193(e)(2)(ii); TMEP §§611.06(a)-(h), 712.01.
Applicant has an attorney. The attorney must sign the response. 37 C.F.R. §2.193(e)(2)(i); TMEP §712.01. The only attorneys who may sign responses are (1) attorneys in good standing with a bar of the highest court of any U.S. state or territory, and (2) Canadian trademark attorneys or agents reciprocally recognized by the USPTO’s Office of Enrollment and Discipline (OED). See 37 C.F.R. §§2.17(a), 11.14(a), (c), (e); TMEP §602.
The USPTO must receive a properly signed response before the deadline or the USPTO will consider the application abandoned. 37 C.F.R. §2.65(a); TMEP §718.03. In such case, applicant may file a new application with a new fee. A petition to the Director to reverse the holding of abandonment may be granted in very limited circumstances as outlined in TMEP §1713.01.
/Sara Benjamin/
Staff Attorney
Law Office 100
sara.benjamin@uspto.gov
571.272.8847