Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. PTO Form 1960 (Rev 10/2011) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020) |
Input Field |
Entered |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SERIAL NUMBER | 88123618 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED | LAW OFFICE 104 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
MARK SECTION | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
MARK FILE NAME | http://uspto.report/TM/88123618/mark.png | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
LITERAL ELEMENT | TASTY | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
STANDARD CHARACTERS | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ARGUMENT(S) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE
In re Application of : : BuzzFeed, Inc. : Examining Attorney: : Jenny Park Serial No.: 88123618 : : Law Office 104 Filed: September 19, 2018 : : Mark: TASTY Stylized : : Class: 30 : RESPONSE AND REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
This is in response to the Office Action dated July 31, 2019, in which the Examining Attorney made FINAL the refusal to register Applicant’s TASTY Stylized mark (“Applicant’s Mark”) on the ground that the mark merely describes a characteristic of the goods, under Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1). Applicant respectfully submits that the subject mark is suggestive and not merely descriptive of the goods provided. In the FINAL Office Action the Examining Attorney has cited additional instances of third-party registrations in Class 30 where the term “TASTY” is disclaimed, or the marks are registered on the Supplemental Register, or under Section 2(f). The Examining Attorney goes on to argue these third-party registrations are probative evidence on the issue of descriptiveness. E.g., In re Morinaga Nyugyo Kabushiki Kaisha, 120 USPQ2d 1738, 1745 (TTAB 2016) (quoting Inst. Nat’l des Appellations D’Origine v. Vintners Int’l Co., 958 F.2d 1574, 1581-82, 22 USPQ2d 1190, 1196 (Fed. Cir. 1992)); In re Box Solutions Corp., 79 USPQ2d 1953, 1955 (TTAB 2006). Under the same legal standard, Applicant will present very recently allowed applications and registrations for TASTY-formative marks for food, and food-related goods that have achieved registration on the Principal Register—without a disclaimer, 2(f) claims, or placement on the Supplemental Register—as probative evidence of the inherent distinctiveness of Applicant’s mark. While the question to be answered is whether the subject mark functions as a trademark on its own merits, it is nonetheless instructive to note that the Office has accepted dozens of “TASTY” marks in Class 30 on the Principal Register, without a disclaimer, 2(f) claims, or placement on the Supplemental Register. Although Applicant acknowledges those third-party registrations presented by the Examining Attorney, here we present seven (7) additional recently allowed or registered marks in Class 30, all of which were examined and approved by the Office in the past year (third-party registrations attached).
With regard to the Examining Attorney’s evidence, Applicant cannot account for why those third-parties elected not to challenge the disclaimer requirement put to them by the Office, or their placement on the Supplemental Register. However, it must be acknowledged that many third-parties do not have the resources or capacity to challenge these refusals, and instead take the path of least resistance. The third-party registrations presented by Applicant and the Examining Attorney—viewed in their totality—indicates Applicant’s TASTY Stylized mark is at worst suggestive of the subject goods, and that consumers are capable of recognizing it as more than merely descriptive of its Class 30 goods. Conclusion For the reasons presented here, Applicant respectfully requests that the Examining Attorney withdraw the refusal to register the subject application, and move it on for publication in the Official Gazette. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
EVIDENCE SECTION | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
EVIDENCE FILE NAME(S) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
ORIGINAL PDF FILE | evi_20447535-20200131112544950580_._OAR_2e_-_RFR_-_TASTY_Stylized_in_Class_30.pdf | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CONVERTED PDF FILE(S) (4 pages) |
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\881\236\88123618\xml8\RFR0002.JPG | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\881\236\88123618\xml8\RFR0003.JPG | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\881\236\88123618\xml8\RFR0004.JPG | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\881\236\88123618\xml8\RFR0005.JPG | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
ORIGINAL PDF FILE | evi_20447535-20200131112544950580_._Exhibit_A__88123606_.pdf | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CONVERTED PDF FILE(S) (8 pages) |
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\881\236\88123618\xml8\RFR0006.JPG | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\881\236\88123618\xml8\RFR0007.JPG | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\881\236\88123618\xml8\RFR0008.JPG | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\881\236\88123618\xml8\RFR0009.JPG | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\881\236\88123618\xml8\RFR0010.JPG | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\881\236\88123618\xml8\RFR0011.JPG | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\881\236\88123618\xml8\RFR0012.JPG | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\881\236\88123618\xml8\RFR0013.JPG | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
DESCRIPTION OF EVIDENCE FILE | Argument and Exhibit A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ATTORNEY SECTION (current) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
NAME | Michelle Mancino Marsh | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ATTORNEY BAR MEMBERSHIP NUMBER | NOT SPECIFIED | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
YEAR OF ADMISSION | NOT SPECIFIED | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. STATE/ COMMONWEALTH/ TERRITORY | NOT SPECIFIED | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
FIRM NAME | Arent Fox LLP | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
STREET | 1301 Avenue of the Americas, Floor 42 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CITY | New York | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
STATE | New York | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
POSTAL CODE | 10019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
COUNTRY | US | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
PHONE | 212-484-3900 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
FAX | 212-484-3990 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
tmdocket@arentfox.com | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 039779 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ATTORNEY SECTION (proposed) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
NAME | Michelle Mancino Marsh | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ATTORNEY BAR MEMBERSHIP NUMBER | XXX | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
YEAR OF ADMISSION | XXXX | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. STATE/ COMMONWEALTH/ TERRITORY | XX | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
FIRM NAME | Arent Fox LLP | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
STREET | 1301 Avenue of the Americas, Floor 42 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CITY | New York | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
STATE | New York | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
POSTAL CODE | 10019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
COUNTRY | United States | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
PHONE | 212-484-3900 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
FAX | 212-484-3990 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
tmdocket@arentfox.com | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 039779.00152 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CORRESPONDENCE SECTION (current) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
NAME | Michelle Mancino Marsh | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
FIRM NAME | Arent Fox LLP | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
STREET | 1301 Avenue of the Americas, Floor 42 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CITY | New York | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
STATE | New York | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
POSTAL CODE | 10019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
COUNTRY | US | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
PHONE | 212-484-3900 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
FAX | 212-484-3990 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
tmdocket@arentfox.com | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 039779 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CORRESPONDENCE SECTION (proposed) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
NAME | Michelle Mancino Marsh | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
FIRM NAME | Arent Fox LLP | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
STREET | 1301 Avenue of the Americas, Floor 42 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CITY | New York | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
STATE | New York | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
POSTAL CODE | 10019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
COUNTRY | United States | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
PHONE | 212-484-3900 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
FAX | 212-484-3990 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
tmdocket@arentfox.com; michelle.marsh@arentfox.com; peter.menchini@arentfox.com; portia.gordon@arentfox.com | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 039779.00152 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
SIGNATURE SECTION | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
RESPONSE SIGNATURE | /Peter Menchini/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
SIGNATORY'S NAME | Peter Menchini | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
SIGNATORY'S POSITION | Attorney of Record, Associate, Arent Fox LLP, New York Bar member | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER | 212.457.5472 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
DATE SIGNED | 01/31/2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY | YES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CONCURRENT APPEAL NOTICE FILED | NO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
FILING INFORMATION SECTION | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
SUBMIT DATE | Fri Jan 31 14:47:48 EST 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TEAS STAMP | USPTO/RFR-XXX.X.XX.XX-202 00131144748109304-8812361 8-70046418c90ce44b7729f54 982b3edfb3fe6e8d6e732db5d 4b4eace6513fcd36d-N/A-N/A -20200131142853532579 |
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. PTO Form 1960 (Rev 10/2011) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020) |
IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE
In re Application of :
:
BuzzFeed, Inc. : Examining Attorney:
: Jenny Park
Serial No.: 88123618 :
: Law Office 104
Filed: September 19, 2018 :
:
Mark: TASTY Stylized :
:
Class: 30 :
RESPONSE AND REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
This is in response to the Office Action dated July 31, 2019, in which the Examining Attorney made FINAL the refusal to register Applicant’s TASTY Stylized mark (“Applicant’s Mark”) on the ground that the mark merely describes a characteristic of the goods, under Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1). Applicant respectfully submits that the subject mark is suggestive and not merely descriptive of the goods provided.
In the FINAL Office Action the Examining Attorney has cited additional instances of third-party registrations in Class 30 where the term “TASTY” is disclaimed, or the marks are registered on the Supplemental Register, or under Section 2(f). The Examining Attorney goes on to argue these third-party registrations are probative evidence on the issue of descriptiveness. E.g., In re Morinaga Nyugyo Kabushiki Kaisha, 120 USPQ2d 1738, 1745 (TTAB 2016) (quoting Inst. Nat’l des Appellations D’Origine v. Vintners Int’l Co., 958 F.2d 1574, 1581-82, 22 USPQ2d 1190, 1196 (Fed. Cir. 1992)); In re Box Solutions Corp., 79 USPQ2d 1953, 1955 (TTAB 2006). Under the same legal standard, Applicant will present very recently allowed applications and registrations for TASTY-formative marks for food, and food-related goods that have achieved registration on the Principal Register—without a disclaimer, 2(f) claims, or placement on the Supplemental Register—as probative evidence of the inherent distinctiveness of Applicant’s mark.
While the question to be answered is whether the subject mark functions as a trademark on its own merits, it is nonetheless instructive to note that the Office has accepted dozens of “TASTY” marks in Class 30 on the Principal Register, without a disclaimer, 2(f) claims, or placement on the Supplemental Register. Although Applicant acknowledges those third-party registrations presented by the Examining Attorney, here we present seven (7) additional recently allowed or registered marks in Class 30, all of which were examined and approved by the Office in the past year (third-party registrations attached).
Ref. / Mark / Owner |
Filing Details |
Classes: Goods |
US-1
HELLA TASTY
OUTSTANDING FOODS, INC. |
App 88500404 App 03-JUL-2019 |
Class 30: RICE-BASED SNACK FOODS |
US-2
TASTY AS HELL
OUTSTANDING FOODS, INC. |
App 88494268 App 28-JUN-2019 |
Class 30: RICE-BASED SNACK FOODS |
US-3
TASTY TYKES
LAKES VENTURE, LLC |
App 88341597 App 15-MAR-2019 Reg 5862798 Reg 17-SEP-2019 |
Class 30: CHEESE FLAVORED PUFFED CORN SNACKS; CORN-BASED SNACK FOODS; MULTIGRAIN-BASED SNACK FOODS; RICE-BASED SNACK FOOD
|
US-4
RICE & TASTY
VEETEE RICE LIMITED |
App 88282101 App 30-JAN-2019 Reg 5834105 Reg 13-AUG-2019 |
Class 30: RICE |
US-5
THAT'S TASTY & Design
SHENANDOAH GROWERS, INC. |
App 88224251 App 11-DEC-2018 |
Class 30: ORGANIC HERB PUREES; DRIED ORGANIC HERBS |
US-6
THAT'S TASTY
SHENANDOAH GROWERS, INC. |
App 88224260 App 11-DEC-2018 |
Class 30: HERB PUREES; DRIED HERBS |
US-7
TASTY CHEFS
CORFU - TASTY GYROS, INC. |
App 88166313 App 23-OCT-2018 |
INT. CL. 30 COOKIES; CRACKERS; BISCOTTIS; GYROS IN THE NATURE OF SANDWICHES CONTAINING THINLY-SLICED LAMB; |
With regard to the Examining Attorney’s evidence, Applicant cannot account for why those third-parties elected not to challenge the disclaimer requirement put to them by the Office, or their placement on the Supplemental Register. However, it must be acknowledged that many third-parties do not have the resources or capacity to challenge these refusals, and instead take the path of least resistance. The third-party registrations presented by Applicant and the Examining Attorney—viewed in their totality—indicates Applicant’s TASTY Stylized mark is at worst suggestive of the subject goods, and that consumers are capable of recognizing it as more than merely descriptive of its Class 30 goods.
Conclusion
For the reasons presented here, Applicant respectfully requests that the Examining Attorney withdraw the refusal to register the subject application, and move it on for publication in the Official Gazette.