TEAS Request Reconsideration after FOA

TASTY

BuzzFeed, Inc.

TEAS Request Reconsideration after FOA

Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
PTO Form 1960 (Rev 10/2011)
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020)

Request for Reconsideration after Final Action


The table below presents the data as entered.

Input Field
Entered
SERIAL NUMBER 88123618
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED LAW OFFICE 104
MARK SECTION
MARK FILE NAME http://uspto.report/TM/88123618/mark.png
LITERAL ELEMENT TASTY
STANDARD CHARACTERS NO
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE NO
ARGUMENT(S)

IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

 

In re Application of                                                    :

            :

BuzzFeed, Inc.                                                            :           Examining Attorney: 

:           Jenny Park

Serial No.:  88123618                                                 :

            :           Law Office 104

Filed:  September 19, 2018                                         :

            :

Mark: TASTY Stylized                                             :

                                                                                    :

Class: 30                                                                     :    


RESPONSE AND REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

 

This is in response to the Office Action dated July 31, 2019, in which the Examining Attorney made FINAL the refusal to register Applicant’s TASTY Stylized mark (“Applicant’s Mark”) on the ground that the mark merely describes a characteristic of the goods, under Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1).  Applicant respectfully submits that the subject mark is suggestive and not merely descriptive of the goods provided.

In the FINAL Office Action the Examining Attorney has cited additional instances of third-party registrations in Class 30 where the term “TASTY” is disclaimed, or the marks are registered on the Supplemental Register, or under Section 2(f).  The Examining Attorney goes on to argue these third-party registrations are probative evidence on the issue of descriptiveness.  E.g., In re Morinaga Nyugyo Kabushiki Kaisha, 120 USPQ2d 1738, 1745 (TTAB 2016) (quoting Inst. Nat’l des Appellations D’Origine v. Vintners Int’l Co., 958 F.2d 1574, 1581-82, 22 USPQ2d 1190, 1196 (Fed. Cir. 1992)); In re Box Solutions Corp., 79 USPQ2d 1953, 1955 (TTAB 2006).  Under the same legal standard, Applicant will present very recently allowed applications and registrations for TASTY-formative marks for food, and food-related goods that have achieved registration on the Principal Register—without a disclaimer, 2(f) claims, or placement on the Supplemental Register—as probative evidence of the inherent distinctiveness of Applicant’s mark.

             While the question to be answered is whether the subject mark functions as a trademark on its own merits, it is nonetheless instructive to note that the Office has accepted dozens of “TASTY” marks in Class 30 on the Principal Register, without a disclaimer, 2(f) claims, or placement on the Supplemental Register.  Although Applicant acknowledges those third-party registrations presented by the Examining Attorney, here we present seven (7) additional recently allowed or registered marks in Class 30, all of which were examined and approved by the Office in the past year (third-party registrations attached). 

Ref. / Mark / Owner

Filing Details

Classes: Goods

US-1

 

HELLA TASTY

 

OUTSTANDING FOODS, INC.

App 88500404

App 03-JUL-2019

Class 30: RICE-BASED SNACK FOODS

US-2

 

TASTY AS HELL

 

OUTSTANDING FOODS, INC.

App 88494268

App 28-JUN-2019

Class 30: RICE-BASED SNACK FOODS

US-3

 

TASTY TYKES

 

LAKES VENTURE, LLC

App 88341597

App 15-MAR-2019

Reg 5862798

Reg 17-SEP-2019

Class 30: CHEESE FLAVORED PUFFED CORN SNACKS; CORN-BASED SNACK FOODS; MULTIGRAIN-BASED SNACK FOODS; RICE-BASED SNACK FOOD

 

US-4

 

RICE & TASTY

 

VEETEE RICE LIMITED

App 88282101

App 30-JAN-2019

Reg 5834105

Reg 13-AUG-2019

Class 30: RICE

US-5

 

THAT'S TASTY & Design

 

SHENANDOAH GROWERS, INC.

App 88224251

App 11-DEC-2018

Class 30: ORGANIC HERB PUREES; DRIED ORGANIC HERBS

US-6

 

THAT'S TASTY

 

SHENANDOAH GROWERS, INC.

App 88224260

App 11-DEC-2018

Class 30: HERB PUREES; DRIED HERBS

US-7

 

TASTY CHEFS

 

CORFU - TASTY GYROS, INC.

App 88166313

App 23-OCT-2018

INT. CL. 30 COOKIES; CRACKERS; BISCOTTIS; GYROS IN THE NATURE OF SANDWICHES CONTAINING THINLY-SLICED LAMB;

 

With regard to the Examining Attorney’s evidence, Applicant cannot account for why those third-parties elected not to challenge the disclaimer requirement put to them by the Office, or their placement on the Supplemental Register.  However, it must be acknowledged that many third-parties do not have the resources or capacity to challenge these refusals, and instead take the path of least resistance.  The third-party registrations presented by Applicant and the Examining Attorney—viewed in their totality—indicates Applicant’s TASTY Stylized mark is at worst suggestive of the subject goods, and that consumers are capable of recognizing it as more than merely descriptive of its Class 30 goods. 

Conclusion

            For the reasons presented here, Applicant respectfully requests that the Examining Attorney withdraw the refusal to register the subject application, and move it on for publication in the Official Gazette.

EVIDENCE SECTION
        EVIDENCE FILE NAME(S)
       ORIGINAL PDF FILE evi_20447535-20200131112544950580_._OAR_2e_-_RFR_-_TASTY_Stylized_in_Class_30.pdf
       CONVERTED PDF FILE(S)
       (4 pages)
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\881\236\88123618\xml8\RFR0002.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\881\236\88123618\xml8\RFR0003.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\881\236\88123618\xml8\RFR0004.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\881\236\88123618\xml8\RFR0005.JPG
       ORIGINAL PDF FILE evi_20447535-20200131112544950580_._Exhibit_A__88123606_.pdf
       CONVERTED PDF FILE(S)
       (8 pages)
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\881\236\88123618\xml8\RFR0006.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\881\236\88123618\xml8\RFR0007.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\881\236\88123618\xml8\RFR0008.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\881\236\88123618\xml8\RFR0009.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\881\236\88123618\xml8\RFR0010.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\881\236\88123618\xml8\RFR0011.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\881\236\88123618\xml8\RFR0012.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\881\236\88123618\xml8\RFR0013.JPG
DESCRIPTION OF EVIDENCE FILE Argument and Exhibit A
ATTORNEY SECTION (current)
NAME Michelle Mancino Marsh
ATTORNEY BAR MEMBERSHIP NUMBER NOT SPECIFIED
YEAR OF ADMISSION NOT SPECIFIED
U.S. STATE/ COMMONWEALTH/ TERRITORY NOT SPECIFIED
FIRM NAME Arent Fox LLP
STREET 1301 Avenue of the Americas, Floor 42
CITY New York
STATE New York
POSTAL CODE 10019
COUNTRY US
PHONE 212-484-3900
FAX 212-484-3990
EMAIL tmdocket@arentfox.com
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL Yes
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER 039779
ATTORNEY SECTION (proposed)
NAME Michelle Mancino Marsh
ATTORNEY BAR MEMBERSHIP NUMBER XXX
YEAR OF ADMISSION XXXX
U.S. STATE/ COMMONWEALTH/ TERRITORY XX
FIRM NAME Arent Fox LLP
STREET 1301 Avenue of the Americas, Floor 42
CITY New York
STATE New York
POSTAL CODE 10019
COUNTRY United States
PHONE 212-484-3900
FAX 212-484-3990
EMAIL tmdocket@arentfox.com
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL Yes
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER 039779.00152
CORRESPONDENCE SECTION (current)
NAME Michelle Mancino Marsh
FIRM NAME Arent Fox LLP
STREET 1301 Avenue of the Americas, Floor 42
CITY New York
STATE New York
POSTAL CODE 10019
COUNTRY US
PHONE 212-484-3900
FAX 212-484-3990
EMAIL tmdocket@arentfox.com
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL Yes
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER 039779
CORRESPONDENCE SECTION (proposed)
NAME Michelle Mancino Marsh
FIRM NAME Arent Fox LLP
STREET 1301 Avenue of the Americas, Floor 42
CITY New York
STATE New York
POSTAL CODE 10019
COUNTRY United States
PHONE 212-484-3900
FAX 212-484-3990
EMAIL tmdocket@arentfox.com; michelle.marsh@arentfox.com; peter.menchini@arentfox.com; portia.gordon@arentfox.com
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL Yes
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER 039779.00152
SIGNATURE SECTION
RESPONSE SIGNATURE /Peter Menchini/
SIGNATORY'S NAME Peter Menchini
SIGNATORY'S POSITION Attorney of Record, Associate, Arent Fox LLP, New York Bar member
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER 212.457.5472
DATE SIGNED 01/31/2020
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY YES
CONCURRENT APPEAL NOTICE FILED NO
FILING INFORMATION SECTION
SUBMIT DATE Fri Jan 31 14:47:48 EST 2020
TEAS STAMP USPTO/RFR-XXX.X.XX.XX-202
00131144748109304-8812361
8-70046418c90ce44b7729f54
982b3edfb3fe6e8d6e732db5d
4b4eace6513fcd36d-N/A-N/A
-20200131142853532579



Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
PTO Form 1960 (Rev 10/2011)
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020)

Request for Reconsideration after Final Action


To the Commissioner for Trademarks:

Application serial no. 88123618 TASTY (Stylized and/or with Design, see http://uspto.report/TM/88123618/mark.png) has been amended as follows:

ARGUMENT(S)
In response to the substantive refusal(s), please note the following:

IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

 

In re Application of                                                    :

            :

BuzzFeed, Inc.                                                            :           Examining Attorney: 

:           Jenny Park

Serial No.:  88123618                                                 :

            :           Law Office 104

Filed:  September 19, 2018                                         :

            :

Mark: TASTY Stylized                                             :

                                                                                    :

Class: 30                                                                     :    


RESPONSE AND REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

 

This is in response to the Office Action dated July 31, 2019, in which the Examining Attorney made FINAL the refusal to register Applicant’s TASTY Stylized mark (“Applicant’s Mark”) on the ground that the mark merely describes a characteristic of the goods, under Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1).  Applicant respectfully submits that the subject mark is suggestive and not merely descriptive of the goods provided.

In the FINAL Office Action the Examining Attorney has cited additional instances of third-party registrations in Class 30 where the term “TASTY” is disclaimed, or the marks are registered on the Supplemental Register, or under Section 2(f).  The Examining Attorney goes on to argue these third-party registrations are probative evidence on the issue of descriptiveness.  E.g., In re Morinaga Nyugyo Kabushiki Kaisha, 120 USPQ2d 1738, 1745 (TTAB 2016) (quoting Inst. Nat’l des Appellations D’Origine v. Vintners Int’l Co., 958 F.2d 1574, 1581-82, 22 USPQ2d 1190, 1196 (Fed. Cir. 1992)); In re Box Solutions Corp., 79 USPQ2d 1953, 1955 (TTAB 2006).  Under the same legal standard, Applicant will present very recently allowed applications and registrations for TASTY-formative marks for food, and food-related goods that have achieved registration on the Principal Register—without a disclaimer, 2(f) claims, or placement on the Supplemental Register—as probative evidence of the inherent distinctiveness of Applicant’s mark.

             While the question to be answered is whether the subject mark functions as a trademark on its own merits, it is nonetheless instructive to note that the Office has accepted dozens of “TASTY” marks in Class 30 on the Principal Register, without a disclaimer, 2(f) claims, or placement on the Supplemental Register.  Although Applicant acknowledges those third-party registrations presented by the Examining Attorney, here we present seven (7) additional recently allowed or registered marks in Class 30, all of which were examined and approved by the Office in the past year (third-party registrations attached). 

Ref. / Mark / Owner

Filing Details

Classes: Goods

US-1

 

HELLA TASTY

 

OUTSTANDING FOODS, INC.

App 88500404

App 03-JUL-2019

Class 30: RICE-BASED SNACK FOODS

US-2

 

TASTY AS HELL

 

OUTSTANDING FOODS, INC.

App 88494268

App 28-JUN-2019

Class 30: RICE-BASED SNACK FOODS

US-3

 

TASTY TYKES

 

LAKES VENTURE, LLC

App 88341597

App 15-MAR-2019

Reg 5862798

Reg 17-SEP-2019

Class 30: CHEESE FLAVORED PUFFED CORN SNACKS; CORN-BASED SNACK FOODS; MULTIGRAIN-BASED SNACK FOODS; RICE-BASED SNACK FOOD

 

US-4

 

RICE & TASTY

 

VEETEE RICE LIMITED

App 88282101

App 30-JAN-2019

Reg 5834105

Reg 13-AUG-2019

Class 30: RICE

US-5

 

THAT'S TASTY & Design

 

SHENANDOAH GROWERS, INC.

App 88224251

App 11-DEC-2018

Class 30: ORGANIC HERB PUREES; DRIED ORGANIC HERBS

US-6

 

THAT'S TASTY

 

SHENANDOAH GROWERS, INC.

App 88224260

App 11-DEC-2018

Class 30: HERB PUREES; DRIED HERBS

US-7

 

TASTY CHEFS

 

CORFU - TASTY GYROS, INC.

App 88166313

App 23-OCT-2018

INT. CL. 30 COOKIES; CRACKERS; BISCOTTIS; GYROS IN THE NATURE OF SANDWICHES CONTAINING THINLY-SLICED LAMB;

 

With regard to the Examining Attorney’s evidence, Applicant cannot account for why those third-parties elected not to challenge the disclaimer requirement put to them by the Office, or their placement on the Supplemental Register.  However, it must be acknowledged that many third-parties do not have the resources or capacity to challenge these refusals, and instead take the path of least resistance.  The third-party registrations presented by Applicant and the Examining Attorney—viewed in their totality—indicates Applicant’s TASTY Stylized mark is at worst suggestive of the subject goods, and that consumers are capable of recognizing it as more than merely descriptive of its Class 30 goods. 

Conclusion

            For the reasons presented here, Applicant respectfully requests that the Examining Attorney withdraw the refusal to register the subject application, and move it on for publication in the Official Gazette.



EVIDENCE
Evidence in the nature of Argument and Exhibit A has been attached.
Original PDF file:
evi_20447535-20200131112544950580_._OAR_2e_-_RFR_-_TASTY_Stylized_in_Class_30.pdf
Converted PDF file(s) ( 4 pages)
Evidence-1
Evidence-2
Evidence-3
Evidence-4
Original PDF file:
evi_20447535-20200131112544950580_._Exhibit_A__88123606_.pdf
Converted PDF file(s) ( 8 pages)
Evidence-1
Evidence-2
Evidence-3
Evidence-4
Evidence-5
Evidence-6
Evidence-7
Evidence-8

The applicant's current attorney information: Michelle Mancino Marsh. Michelle Mancino Marsh of Arent Fox LLP, is located at

      1301 Avenue of the Americas, Floor 42
      New York, New York 10019
      US
The docket/reference number is 039779.

The phone number is 212-484-3900.

The fax number is 212-484-3990.

The email address is tmdocket@arentfox.com

The applicants proposed attorney information: Michelle Mancino Marsh. Michelle Mancino Marsh of Arent Fox LLP, is a member of the XX bar, admitted to the bar in XXXX, bar membership no. XXX, is located at

      1301 Avenue of the Americas, Floor 42
      New York, New York 10019
      United States
The docket/reference number is 039779.00152.

The phone number is 212-484-3900.

The fax number is 212-484-3990.

The email address is tmdocket@arentfox.com

Michelle Mancino Marsh submitted the following statement: The attorney of record is an active member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state, the District of Columbia, or any U.S. Commonwealth or territory.
The applicant's current correspondence information: Michelle Mancino Marsh. Michelle Mancino Marsh of Arent Fox LLP, is located at

      1301 Avenue of the Americas, Floor 42
      New York, New York 10019
      US
The docket/reference number is 039779.

The phone number is 212-484-3900.

The fax number is 212-484-3990.

The email address is tmdocket@arentfox.com

The applicants proposed correspondence information: Michelle Mancino Marsh. Michelle Mancino Marsh of Arent Fox LLP, is located at

      1301 Avenue of the Americas, Floor 42
      New York, New York 10019
      United States
The docket/reference number is 039779.00152.

The phone number is 212-484-3900.

The fax number is 212-484-3990.

The email address is tmdocket@arentfox.com; michelle.marsh@arentfox.com; peter.menchini@arentfox.com; portia.gordon@arentfox.com

SIGNATURE(S)
Request for Reconsideration Signature
Signature: /Peter Menchini/     Date: 01/31/2020
Signatory's Name: Peter Menchini
Signatory's Position: Attorney of Record, Associate, Arent Fox LLP, New York Bar member

Signatory's Phone Number: 212.457.5472

The signatory has confirmed that he/she is a U.S.-licensed attorney who is an active member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state (including the District of Columbia and any U.S. Commonwealth or territory); and he/she is currently the owner's/holder's attorney or an associate thereof; and to the best of his/her knowledge, if prior to his/her appointment another U.S.-licensed attorney not currently associated with his/her company/firm previously represented the owner/holder in this matter: the owner/holder has revoked their power of attorney by a signed revocation or substitute power of attorney with the USPTO; the USPTO has granted that attorney's withdrawal request; the owner/holder has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her in this matter; or the owner's/holder's appointed U.S.-licensed attorney has filed a power of attorney appointing him/her as an associate attorney in this matter.

The applicant is not filing a Notice of Appeal in conjunction with this Request for Reconsideration.

Mailing Address:    Michelle Mancino Marsh
   Arent Fox LLP
   
   1301 Avenue of the Americas, Floor 42
   New York, New York 10019
Mailing Address:    Michelle Mancino Marsh
   Arent Fox LLP
   1301 Avenue of the Americas, Floor 42
   New York, New York 10019
        
Serial Number: 88123618
Internet Transmission Date: Fri Jan 31 14:47:48 EST 2020
TEAS Stamp: USPTO/RFR-XXX.X.XX.XX-202001311447481093
04-88123618-70046418c90ce44b7729f54982b3
edfb3fe6e8d6e732db5d4b4eace6513fcd36d-N/
A-N/A-20200131142853532579


TEAS Request Reconsideration after FOA [image/jpeg]

TEAS Request Reconsideration after FOA [image/jpeg]

TEAS Request Reconsideration after FOA [image/jpeg]

TEAS Request Reconsideration after FOA [image/jpeg]

TEAS Request Reconsideration after FOA [image/jpeg]

TEAS Request Reconsideration after FOA [image/jpeg]

TEAS Request Reconsideration after FOA [image/jpeg]

TEAS Request Reconsideration after FOA [image/jpeg]

TEAS Request Reconsideration after FOA [image/jpeg]

TEAS Request Reconsideration after FOA [image/jpeg]

TEAS Request Reconsideration after FOA [image/jpeg]

TEAS Request Reconsideration after FOA [image/jpeg]


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed