To: | Supersonic, Inc. (paul@hdmnlaw.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88101597 - SUPERSONIC - SUPR20879TM |
Sent: | July 16, 2019 06:00:29 PM |
Sent As: | ecom108@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88101597
Mark: SUPERSONIC
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: Supersonic, Inc.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. SUPR20879TM
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
SUSPENSION NOTICE
No Response Required
Issue date: July 16, 2019
The application is suspended for the reason(s) specified below. See 37 C.F.R. §2.67; TMEP §§716 et seq.
Application suspended until disposition of cited registration. Registration maintenance documents are or were due to be filed for registration no. 4300409 (ÜBERSCHALL) cited against applicant in a refusal based on Trademark Act Section 2(d). 15 U.S.C. §1052(d). If the maintenance documents are not timely filed and accepted by the USPTO, the cited registration will cancel and/or expire and will no longer bar registration of applicant’s mark under Section 2(d). See 15 U.S.C. §§1058, 1059, 1141k. Action on this application is suspended for six months to await disposition of the cited registration; after which, the trademark examining attorney will determine whether to maintain or withdraw the Section 2(d) refusal. See 37 C.F.R. §2.67; TMEP §716.02(e).
Refusal and/or requirements resolved and maintained and continued:
The following requirements are satisfied:
• Requirement for an amended identification of goods as to “adapters”,“Qi wireless charging pad”, “Wi-Fi speakers” and “augmented reality game controller.”
See TMEP §713.02.
The following refusal and requirement is maintained and continued:
• Section 2(d) Refusal based on the Likelihood of Confusion with Registration No. 3558539 (SUPERSONIX)
• Amended identification of “cables” requires further clarification because it could include goods in more than one class
See id. This refusal and requirement will be made final once this application is removed from suspension, unless a new issue arises. See TMEP §716.01.
Suspension process. The USPTO will periodically check this application to determine if it should remain suspended. See TMEP §716.04. As needed, the trademark examining attorney will issue a letter to applicant to inquire about the status of the reason for the suspension. TMEP §716.05.
No response required. Applicant may file a response, but is not required to do so.
Ashley D. Hayes
/Ashley D. Hayes/
Examining Attorney
Law Office 108
(571) 272-2826
ashley.hayes@uspto.gov