Offc Action Outgoing

SONY

SONY GROUP CORPORATION

U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 88053809 - SONY - 41279.3159

To: Sony Corporation (bhipdocket@bakerlaw.com)
Subject: U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 88053809 - SONY - 41279.3159
Sent: 9/11/2018 5:47:29 PM
Sent As: ECOM123@USPTO.GOV
Attachments:

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO.  88053809

 

MARK: SONY

 

 

        

*88053809*

CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

       ROBERT B.G. HOROWITZ, ESQ.

       BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP

       45 ROCKEFELLER PLAZA, 14TH FLOOR

       NEW YORK, NY 10111

       

 

CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:

http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp

 

VIEW YOUR APPLICATION FILE

 

APPLICANT: Sony Corporation

 

 

 

CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:  

       41279.3159

CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: 

       bhipdocket@bakerlaw.com

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.  A RESPONSE TRANSMITTED THROUGH THE TRADEMARK ELECTRONIC APPLICATION SYSTEM (TEAS) MUST BE RECEIVED BEFORE MIDNIGHT EASTERN TIME OF THE LAST DAY OF THE RESPONSE PERIOD.

 

 

ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 9/11/2018

 

The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned Trademark Examining Attorney.  Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issues below.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.

 

SEARCH OF OFFICE’S DATABASE OF MARKS

 

The Trademark Examining Attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d).  TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).

 

SUMMARY OF ISSUES TO WHICH APPLICANT MUST RESPOND:

 

  • Amended Identification of Services Required
  • Clarification of Number of Classes Required – Multiple Class Application Requirements

 

AMENDED IDENTIFICATION OF SERVICES REQUIRED

 

Applicant has classified "providing downloadable streaming" in International Class 41; however, the proper classification is International Class 38.  Therefore, Applicant may respond by (1) adding International Class 38 to the application and reclassifying these services in the proper international class, (2) deleting "providing downloadable streaming" from the application, or (3) deleting the remainder of the items in the identification and reclassifying the specified services in the proper international class.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.86(a), 6.1; TMEP §§1403.02 et seq.  If Applicant adds one or more international classes to the application, Applicant must comply with the multiple-class requirements specified in this Office action.

 

Further, the identification for “providing electronic publications” in International Class 41 is indefinite and too broad and must be clarified because the wording does not make clear the nature of the publications and could identify publications in International Classes 9 and 41.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03, 1402.11(a)(x).  Applicant must amend this identification to clarify whether the electronic publications are downloadable or recorded on computer media, such as CDs or DVDs, in International Class 9; or are online non-downloadable publications in International Class 41.  In addition, Applicant must specify (1) the common name of the type of publications, such as brochures, newsletters, or magazines; and (2) the subject matter of the publications.  See TMEP §1402.03(e).  If the subject matter is not a significant aspect of the publications, the identification may specify the general character or type of the publications (e.g., downloadable electronic publications in the nature of general feature magazines are acceptable in International Class 9).  Id.  

 

The following are examples of acceptable formats for identifications for electronic publications (additional information must be added in each identification below, as indicated in the curly brackets): 

 

Downloadable electronic publications in the nature of {indicate specific nature of publication, e.g., newsletters, journals, books} in the field of {indicate subject matter} in International Class 9;

 

Electronic publications, namely, {indicate specific type of publication} featuring {indicate subject matter} recorded on computer media in International Class 9; or

 

Non-downloadable electronic publications in the nature of {indicate specific nature of publication} in the field of {indicate subject matter} in International Class 41. 

 

Moreover, Applicant must correct the punctuation in the identification to clarify the individual items in the list of services.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01(a).  Proper punctuation in identifications is necessary to delineate explicitly each service within a list and to avoid ambiguity.  Commas, semicolons, and apostrophes are the only punctuation that should be used in an identification of services.  TMEP §1402.01(a).  Applicant should not use colons, periods, exclamation points, and question marks in an identification.  Id.  In addition, Applicant should not use symbols in the identification such as asterisks (*), at symbols (@), or carets.  Id.

 

In general, commas should be used in an identification (1) to separate a series of related items identified within a particular category of services, (2) before and after “namely,” and (3) between each item in a list of services following “namely” (e.g., personal care products, namely, body lotion, bar soap, shampoo).  Id.  Semicolons generally should be used to separate a series of distinct categories of services within an international class (e.g., personal care products, namely, body lotion; deodorizers for pets; glass cleaners).  Id. 

 

Additional portions of the wording in the identification of goods services are unacceptable because they contain indefinite language and, thus, the nature of these services is unclear.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01. The USPTO requires applicants to identify services with specificity in order to provide public notice, to enable the USPTO to classify the services properly, and to reach informed judgments concerning likelihood of confusion under 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).  The USPTO has discretion to require the degree of particularity deemed necessary to clearly identify the services covered by the mark.   In re Omega SA, 494 F.3d 1362, 83 USPQ2d 1541 (Fed. Cir. 2007). Applicant may refer to the suggested amended identification of services below.

 

The Trademark Act requires that a trademark or service mark application must include a “specification of … the goods or services” in connection with which the mark is being used or will be used.  15 U.S.C. §1051(a)(2) (emphasis added), (b)(2) (emphasis added); see 15 U.S.C. §1053.  Specifically, a complete application must include a “list of the particular goods or services on or in connection with which the applicant uses or intends to use the mark.”  37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6) (emphasis added).  This requirement for a specification of the particular goods or services applies to applications filed under all statutory bases.  See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(a)(2), 1051(b)(2), 1053, 1126(d)-(e), 1141f; 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.01(b)-(c).

 

“The purpose of the identification of services is to provide the general population, including consumers and members of the relevant industry, with an understandable description of the goods and services, which is done by using the common commercial name for the services.”  In re Gulf Coast Nutritionals, Inc., 106 USPQ2d 1243, 1247 (TTAB 2013) (citing In re Sones, 590 F.3d 1282, 1289, 93 USPQ2d 1118, 1124 (Fed. Cir. 2009)).  If there is no common, ordinary name for the services, Applicant should describe the services using wording that would be generally understood by the average person.  See Schenley Indus., Inc. v. Battistoni, 112 USPQ 485, 486 (Comm’r Pats. 1957); Cal. Spray-Chem. Corp. v. Osmose Wood Pres. Co. of Am., 102 USPQ 321, 322 (Comm’r Pats. 1954); TMEP §1402.01.

 

An in depth knowledge of the relevant field should not be necessary for understanding a description of the services.  TMEP §1402.01.  “[T]echnical, high-sounding verbiage” should be avoided.  Cal. Spray-Chem. Corp. v. Osmose Wood Pres. Co. of Am., 102 USPQ at 322.

 

Overall Identification

 

Applicant may adopt the following form of identification, if accurate:

 

Class 9 – Downloadable electronic publications in the nature of {indicate specific nature of publication} in the field of {indicate subject matter of publication}

 

Class 35 – Distribution for others in the field of blank optical discs and pre-recorded optical discs featuring sound, video and data, namely, fulfilling and managing processing orders received from customers, order fulfillment services, including and receiving and putaway processing, and order picking as related to order fulfillment services, warehousing  inventory management in the nature of operating a distribution center or warehousing facility containing distribution inventory and inventory management,; shipping and transportation management, namely, shipment processing, preparing shipping documents and invoices, arranging the transportation of goods for others, providing transportation documents for others, transportation logistics management in the field of blank optical discs, and pre-recorded optical discs featuring sound, video and data,; providing customer service management for others, invoicing, and return management in the nature of management and processing of returned blank optical discs and pre-recorded optical discs featuring sound, video and data; business consultancy services for and by use of via the Internet; retail services or and wholesale store services for featuring electrical machinery and apparatuses; retail services or and wholesale store services for featuring optical discs

 

Class 38 – Streaming of audio and video material, namely, audiovisual works, motion pictures, trailers, television programming, music, and games via the internet

 

Class 39 – Transport, delivery, packaging, and storage of optical discs; packaging services, namely, packaging of optical discs and repackaging of optical discs to the order and specification of others

 

Class 41 – Audio mastering; film mastering services; record mastering; video mastering services; optical disc {indicate type of mastering, e.g., audio} mastering of optical discs services; production of master optical discs recorded with music and video; providing downloadable streaming, {wording misclassified and belongs in Class 38} and wireless non-downloadable entertainment content in the nature of audiovisual works, namely, motion pictures, movie trailers, television programming programs, music, and games by means of an interactive global computer and communications networks; entertainment services, namely, providing non-downloadable prerecorded music, information in the field of music, and commentary and articles about music, all on-line via a global computer network; providing on-line videos featuring {indicate subject matter e.g., music}, not downloadable; providing films, not downloadable, via video-on-demand transmission services; providing on-line music, not downloadable; entertainment services, namely, an ongoing multimedia program featuring {indicate subject matter, e.g., comedy, action, adventure, etc.} distributed via various platforms across multiple forms of transmission media; entertainment services, namely, a multimedia program series featuring comedy, action and adventure distributed via various platforms across multiple forms of transmission media; digital video, audio, and multimedia publishing services; multimedia publishing of books, magazines, journals, software, games, music, and electronic publications; providing non-downloadable electronic publications in the nature of {indicate specific nature of publication} in the field of {indicate subject matter of publication}; providing on-line computer games

 

Scope Advisory

 

Applicant may amend the identification to clarify or limit the services, but not to broaden or expand the services beyond those in the original application or as acceptably amended.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Generally, any deleted services may not later be reinserted.  See TMEP §1402.07(e).

 

ID Manual Online

 

For assistance with identifying and classifying services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual.  See TMEP §1402.04. Applicant is strongly encouraged to consult the ID Manual.

 

CLARIFICATION OF NUMBER OF CLASSES REQUIRED –

MULTIPLE CLASS APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS

 

The application identifies goods and services in more than one international class; therefore, Applicant must satisfy all the requirements below for each international class based on Trademark Act Section 1(b):

 

(1)       List the goods and/or services by their international class number in consecutive numerical order, starting with the lowest numbered class.

 

(2)       Submit a filing fee for each international class not covered by the fees already paid (view the USPTO’s current fee schedule).  The application identifies goods and services that are classified in at least five classes; however, Applicant submitted fees sufficient for only three classes.  Applicant must either submit the filing fees for the classes not covered by the submitted fees or restrict the application to the number of classes covered by the fees already paid.

 

See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(b), 1112, 1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(6)-(7), 2.34(a)(2)-(3), 2.86(a); TMEP §§1403.01, 1403.02(c).

 

See an overview of the requirements for a Section 1(b) multiple-class application and how to satisfy the requirements online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form.

 

RESPONSE GUIDELINES

 

For this application to proceed further, Applicant must explicitly address each requirement raised in this Office action.  To respond to requirements, Applicant should set forth in writing the required changes or statements.  For more information and general tips on responding to USPTO Office actions, response options, and how to file a response online, see “Responding to Office Actions” on the USPTO’s website.

 

If Applicant does not respond to this Office action within six months of the issue/mailing date, or responds by expressly abandoning the application, the application process will end and the trademark will fail to register.  See 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.65(a), 2.68(a); TMEP §§718.01, 718.02.  Additionally, the USPTO will not refund the application filing fee, which is a required processing fee.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(i)-(iv), 2.209(a); TMEP §405.04.

 

When an application has abandoned for failure to respond to an Office action, an applicant may timely file a petition to revive the application, which, if granted, would allow the application to return to active status.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.66; TMEP §1714.  The petition must be filed within two months of the date of issuance of the notice of abandonment and may be filed online via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) with a $100 fee.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(15)(ii), 2.66(a)(1), (b)(1).

 

ASSISTANCE

 

If Applicant has questions regarding this Office action, please telephone or e-mail the assigned Trademark Examining Attorney.  All relevant e-mail communications will be placed in the official application record; however, an e-mail communication will not be accepted as a response to this Office action and will not extend the deadline for filing a proper response.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05. 

 

TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE:  Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820.  TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services.  37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04.  However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an Examiner’s Amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.  

 

/Samantha Sherman/

Examining Attorney

Law Office 123

(571) 270-0903

Samantha.Sherman@uspto.gov

 

TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:  Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.  Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application.  For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov.  For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned Trademark Examining Attorney.  E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.

 

All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.

 

WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE:  It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants).  If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response. 

 

PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION:  To ensure that Applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/.  Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen.  If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199.  For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.

 

TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS:  Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.

 

 

U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 88053809 - SONY - 41279.3159

To: Sony Corporation (bhipdocket@bakerlaw.com)
Subject: U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 88053809 - SONY - 41279.3159
Sent: 9/11/2018 5:47:30 PM
Sent As: ECOM123@USPTO.GOV
Attachments:

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

 

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING YOUR

U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

USPTO OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) HAS ISSUED

ON 9/11/2018 FOR U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 88053809

 

Please follow the instructions below:

 

(1)  TO READ THE LETTER:  Click on this link or go to http://tsdr.uspto.gov,enter the U.S. application serial number, and click on “Documents.”

 

The Office action may not be immediately viewable, to allow for necessary system updates of the application, but will be available within 24 hours of this e-mail notification.

 

(2)  TIMELY RESPONSE IS REQUIRED:  Please carefully review the Office action to determine (1) how to respond, and (2) the applicable response time period.  Your response deadline will be calculated from 9/11/2018 (or sooner if specified in the Office action).  A response transmitted through the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) must be received before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  For information regarding response time periods, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/responsetime.jsp.

 

Do NOT hit “Reply” to this e-mail notification, or otherwise e-mail your response because the USPTO does NOT accept e-mails as responses to Office actions.  Instead, the USPTO recommends that you respond online using the TEAS response form located at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.

 

(3)  QUESTIONS:  For questions about the contents of the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney.  For technical assistance in accessing or viewing the Office action in the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system, please e-mail TSDR@uspto.gov.

 

WARNING

 

Failure to file the required response by the applicable response deadline will result in the ABANDONMENT of your application.  For more information regarding abandonment, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/basics/abandon.jsp.

 

PRIVATE COMPANY SOLICITATIONS REGARDING YOUR APPLICATION:  Private companies not associated with the USPTO are using information provided in trademark applications to mail or e-mail trademark-related solicitations.  These companies often use names that closely resemble the USPTO and their solicitations may look like an official government document.  Many solicitations require that you pay “fees.” 

 

Please carefully review all correspondence you receive regarding this application to make sure that you are responding to an official document from the USPTO rather than a private company solicitation.  All official USPTO correspondence will be mailed only from the “United States Patent and Trademark Office” in Alexandria, VA; or sent by e-mail from the domain “@uspto.gov.”  For more information on how to handle private company solicitations, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/solicitation_warnings.jsp.

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed