Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020) |
Input Field |
Entered |
---|---|
SERIAL NUMBER | 88043533 |
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED | LAW OFFICE 105 |
MARK SECTION | |
MARK | http://uspto.report/TM/88043533/mark.png |
LITERAL ELEMENT | CLEAN SWEEP |
STANDARD CHARACTERS | YES |
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE | YES |
MARK STATEMENT | The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font style, size or color. |
ARGUMENT(S) | |
RESPONSE
The Examining Attorney has refused registration of the applied for mark under USC Section 1052(d) based on the contention that the Applicant’s mark when used with the identified goods is likely to be confused with the registered mark in U.S. Registration No. 3,395,749. Applicant respectfully disagrees but reserves its right to submit substantive arguments if and when the cited registration is renewed.
At this juncture, Applicant requests the Examining Attorney suspend the examination of the subject application pending the cancellation of the cited registration for failure to file a renewal application prior to the late filing grace period deadline of September 11, 2018. In investigating the cited Registrant, the Applicant has found no use of the mark or any information about the mark as used by the Registrant.
If the Examining Attorney has any questions or requires additional information, please contact the undersigned. Applicant’s counsel thanks the Examining Attorney for his assistance and looks forward to receiving a suspension action in due course. |
|
SIGNATURE SECTION | |
RESPONSE SIGNATURE | /dax alvarez/ |
SIGNATORY'S NAME | Dax Alvarez |
SIGNATORY'S POSITION | Attorney of Record, CA Bar Member |
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER | 213-929-2500 |
DATE SIGNED | 08/15/2018 |
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY | YES |
FILING INFORMATION SECTION | |
SUBMIT DATE | Wed Aug 15 13:40:45 EDT 2018 |
TEAS STAMP | USPTO/ROA-XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX -20180815134045038778-880 43533-6105b9f557757dd19c2 8d88ce43a5863bde1783d5d74 dc895b9961019a2985f539-N/ A-N/A-2018081513372459236 2 |
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020) |
RESPONSE
The Examining Attorney has refused registration of the applied for mark under USC Section 1052(d) based on the contention that the Applicant’s mark when used with the identified goods is likely to be confused with the registered mark in U.S. Registration No. 3,395,749. Applicant respectfully disagrees but reserves its right to submit substantive arguments if and when the cited registration is renewed.
At this juncture, Applicant requests the Examining Attorney suspend the examination of the subject application pending the cancellation of the cited registration for failure to file a renewal application prior to the late filing grace period deadline of September 11, 2018. In investigating the cited Registrant, the Applicant has found no use of the mark or any information about the mark as used by the Registrant.
If the Examining Attorney has any questions or requires additional information, please contact the undersigned. Applicant’s counsel thanks the Examining Attorney for his assistance and looks forward to receiving a suspension action in due course.