Notation to File

VERO

Weatherford Technology Holdings, LLC

RE: [EXTERNAL] RE: SERIAL NUMBER 88001842 Docket Number: VERO and 88022675 Docket Number: xQuartz   Dear Mr. Kurka:   I understand the reasoning, however for purposes of definiteness and classification rules in the Identification manual the wording “engineering” will be necessary.    Thank you for your cooperation and willingness to resolve this matter efficiently through Examiner’s Amendment. I feel proceed as follows:   Class 37 Oil and gas services for well drilling construction; rental of equipment and tools for automated tubular running operations in the oil and gas industry;     Class 42 Engineering evaluation of pipe make up and connections   Thank You, Kamal   From: Kurka, James L [mailto:JAMES.KURKA@Weatherford.com] Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2018 5:33 PM To: Preet, Kamal <Kamal.Preet@USPTO.GOV> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] RE: SERIAL NUMBER 88001842 Docket Number: VERO and 88022675 Docket Number: xQuartz   Dear Examiner Preet,   “Engineering” would be better, if we needed that. The service at issue is one that connects two sections of pipe using threaded connections that each pipe has on its ends. Once the pipes have been “made up,” the service evaluates the make up and the pipe, and that is why we believe “Engineering” is unnecessary to make it definite.   If you disagree, please use “Engineering” rather than “Materials.”   Best regards, James KurkaSenior Counsel, Intellectual Property Law Department Weatherford │ 2000 St. James Place │ Houston │ Texas │ 77056 Direct: +1.713.836.6874 │ Mobile: +1.713.254.9714 james.kurka@weatherford.com │ www.weatherford.com

NOTE TO THE FILE


SERIAL NUMBER:            88001842

DATE:                                10/05/2018

NAME:                               kpreet

NOTE:         

Searched:                                                             
 X   Google                            
     Lexis/Nexis                       
 X   OneLook
 X   Wikipedia
     Acronym Finder                         Protest evidence reviewed
     Other:

Checked:                                                             
     Geographic significance          
     Surname                          
     Translation
     ID with ID/CLASS mailbox

     Checked list of approved Canadian attorneys and agents

Discussed file with
Attorney/Applicant via:
        phone                               Left message with
    X   email                               Attorney/Applicant

     Requested Law Library search           Issued Examiner’s Amendment
     for:                                   and entered changes in TRADEUPS

        PRINT        DO NOT PRINT           Added design code in TRADEUPS
     Description of the mark
     Translation statement                  Re-imaged standard character
                                            drawing
     Negative translation statement             
     Consent of living individual           Contacted TM MADRID ID/CLASS
                                            about misclassified definite ID
     Changed TRADEUPS to:

     OTHER:

From: Preet, Kamal
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2018 12:11 PM
To: 'Kurka, James L' <JAMES.KURKA@Weatherford.com>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] RE: SERIAL NUMBER 88001842 Docket Number: VERO and 88022675 Docket Number: xQuartz

 

Dear Mr. Kurka:

 

I understand the reasoning, however for purposes of definiteness and classification rules in the Identification manual the wording “engineering” will be necessary. 

 

Thank you for your cooperation and willingness to resolve this matter efficiently through Examiner’s Amendment. I feel proceed as follows:

 

Class 37

Oil and gas services for well drilling construction; rental of equipment and tools for automated tubular running operations in the oil and gas industry;  

 

Class 42

Engineering evaluation of pipe make up and connections

 

Thank You,

Kamal

 

From: Kurka, James L [mailto:JAMES.KURKA@Weatherford.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2018 5:33 PM
To: Preet, Kamal <
Kamal.Preet@USPTO.GOV>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] RE: SERIAL NUMBER 88001842 Docket Number: VERO and 88022675 Docket Number: xQuartz

 

Dear Examiner Preet,

 

“Engineering” would be better, if we needed that. The service at issue is one that connects two sections of pipe using threaded connections that each pipe has on its ends. Once the pipes have been “made up,” the service evaluates the make up and the pipe, and that is why we believe “Engineering” is unnecessary to make it definite.

 

If you disagree, please use “Engineering” rather than “Materials.”

 

Best regards,

James Kurka
Senior Counsel, Intellectual Property
Law Department
Weatherford │ 2000 St. James Place │ Houston │ Texas │ 77056
Direct: +1.713.836.6874Mobile: +1.713.254.9714
james.kurka@weatherford.com www.weatherford.com

 

 

From: Preet, Kamal [mailto:Kamal.Preet@USPTO.GOV]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2018 3:34 PM
To: Kurka, James L
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] RE: SERIAL NUMBER 88001842 Docket Number: VERO and 88022675 Docket Number: xQuartz

 

Thank you.

 

If “engineering” is deleted then it is too broad and the wording is indefinite and unacceptable. The wording “Materials” will need to be added to modify and also qualify the “evaluation of pipe make up and connections” services in Class 42.

 

I will update the application as follows, if acceptable to you:

 

Class 37

Oil and gas services for well drilling construction; rental of equipment and tools for automated tubular running operations in the oil and gas industry;  

 

Class 42

Materials evaluation of pipe make up and connections.

 

Thank You,

Kamal

 

From: Kurka, James L [mailto:JAMES.KURKA@Weatherford.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2018 3:51 PM
To: Preet, Kamal <
Kamal.Preet@USPTO.GOV>
Cc: Weatherford Trademarks <
WFT.Trademarks@weatherford.com>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] RE: SERIAL NUMBER 88001842 Docket Number: VERO and 88022675 Docket Number: xQuartz

 

I understand. Your proposal is fine, but we would still like to omit the word “engineering.”

 

Best regards,

James Kurka
Senior Counsel, Intellectual Property
Law Department
Weatherford │ 2000 St. James Place │ Houston │ Texas │ 77056
Direct: +1.713.836.6874Mobile: +1.713.254.9714
james.kurka@weatherford.com www.weatherford.com

 

 

From: Preet, Kamal [mailto:Kamal.Preet@USPTO.GOV]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2018 2:38 PM
To: Kurka, James L
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: SERIAL NUMBER 88001842 Docket Number: VERO and 88022675 Docket Number: xQuartz

 

Dear Mr. Kurka:

 

Thank you for your email back so quickly. 

 

These services will still remain as a part of the applicant’s services even if they are moved to Class 42. Specifically, the wording “including pipe makeup and connection evaluation” in Class 37 is not a type of service that can be classified in Class 37 because it is an engineering evaluation service and these type of services are classified in Class 42. This is why it must be moved to a different class.  Please let me know if this is confusing or if you need further explanation. 

 

If this explanation makes the amendments acceptable, please let me know and I will make the appropriate changes in VERO application as well. 

 

Thank you for your approval to the amendments in xQuatz.

 

Thank You,

Kamal

 

From: Kurka, James L [mailto:JAMES.KURKA@Weatherford.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2018 3:23 PM
To: Preet, Kamal <
Kamal.Preet@USPTO.GOV>
Cc: Weatherford Trademarks <
WFT.Trademarks@weatherford.com>
Subject: FW: SERIAL NUMBER 88001842 Docket Number: VERO and 88022675 Docket Number: xQuartz

 

Dear Examiner Preet,

 

As to VERO, the amendments are acceptable, except that we want to keep “including pipe makeup and connection evaluation” in Class 37 because that is an important feature of the service. Also, can we remove the proposed word “Engineering” from the Class 42 description?

 

Our client selected that name at the trade name, and I am not aware of any particular significance.

 

As to xQuartz, all of your proposed amendments are acceptable.

 

Please let me know if you have any other questions, and if our exceptions for VERO are ok.

 

Best regards,

James Kurka
Senior Counsel, Intellectual Property
Law Department
Weatherford │ 2000 St. James Place │ Houston │ Texas │ 77056
Direct: +1.713.836.6874Mobile: +1.713.254.9714
james.kurka@weatherford.com www.weatherford.com

 

 

From: Preet, Kamal <Kamal.Preet@USPTO.GOV>
Sent: Thursday, October 4, 2018 1:58 PM
To: Weatherford Trademarks <
WFT.Trademarks@weatherford.com>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] SERIAL NUMBER 88001842 Docket Number: VERO and 88022675 Docket Number: xQuartz

 

Dear Mr. Kurka:

 

I am writing with respect to the above referenced applications because there are a few procedural issues that can be resolved through an Examiner’s Amendment.  I have outlined them below for you to review.

 

SERIAL NUMBER 88001842 Docket Number:  VERO

 

The identification of services is indefinite and must be clarified as follows:

 

Class 37

Oil and gas services for well drilling construction; including rental of equipment and tools for automated tubular running operations in the oil and gas industry;  including pipe make up and connection evaluation

 

Class 42

Engineering evaluation of pipe make up and connections. Oil and gas services for well construction including equipment and tools for automated tubular running operations in the oil and gas industry, including pipe make up and connection evaluation

 

Additionally, what is the significance of “VERO”?

 

SERIAL NUMBER 88022675  Docket Number:  xQuartz

 

The identification of services is indefinite and must be clarified as follows:

 

Class 9

Pressure and temperature measuring gauge that provides featuring a comprehensive multiparameter downhole sensing for well production, injection, and monitoring in real time; pressure gauge featuring Incorporates hybrid electronic technology into the gauge design to provide a rigorous operating envelope that covers extreme environmental, handling, and wellbore conditions

 

If you accept these changes please reply back as soon as possible and I will enter an examiner’s amendment accordingly.  Thank you!

 

Ms. Kamal Preet

Trademark Attorney Advisor
United States Patent and Trademark Office
(571) 272-5645 |
kamal.preet@uspto.gov

 

This message may contain confidential and privileged information. If it has been sent to you in error, please reply to advise the sender of the error and then immediately delete it. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy, disclose or otherwise use this message. The sender disclaims any liability for such unauthorized use. PLEASE NOTE that all incoming e-mails sent to Weatherford e-mail accounts will be archived and may be scanned by us and/or by external service providers to detect and prevent threats to our systems, investigate illegal or inappropriate behavior, and/or eliminate unsolicited promotional e-mails (spam). This process could result in deletion of a legitimate e-mail before it is read by its intended recipient at our organization. Moreover, based on the scanning results, the full text of e-mails and attachments may be made available to Weatherford security and other personnel for review and appropriate action. If you have any concerns about this process, please contact us at dataprivacy@weatherford.com.

         Sent to TICRS as Serial Number: 88022675

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed