Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020) |
Input Field |
Entered |
---|---|
SERIAL NUMBER | 87943274 |
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED | LAW OFFICE 104 |
MARK SECTION | |
MARK | http://tmng-al.gov.uspto.report/resting2/api/img/87943274/large |
LITERAL ELEMENT | MUSE |
STANDARD CHARACTERS | YES |
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE | YES |
MARK STATEMENT | The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font style, size or color. |
ARGUMENT(S) | |
THE APPLICATION SHOULD BE SUSPENDED
The Examining Attorney has potentially refused registration on the grounds that Applicant’s mark is likely to be confused with the pending application for the mark MUSE, Serial No. 79/149,123 in Classes 9 and 11, filed by Muse Concept (“Prior Pending Mark”). The Examining Attorney contends that if the Prior Pending Mark registers, Applicant’s mark may be refused registration under Section 2(d) because of a likelihood of confusion with the registered mark. The Examining Attorney has also refused registration under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. §1052(d) on the grounds that Applicant’s mark is likely to be confused with the mark MUSE, Reg. No. 4,678,804 registered by Amused Inc. for “downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for accessing, aggregating and interacting with content, images and works of art on the lock screen and idle screen of mobile phones, handheld computers and other mobile computing devices, namely, for uploading and downloading electronic files on the lock screen and idle screen of mobile phones, handheld computers and other mobile computing devices” in Class 9 (“Cited Registration”). Applicant elects to not address any specific arguments relating to a likelihood of confusion between its mark and Application Serial No. 79/149,123 or Reg. No. 4,678,804, at this time. The Prior Pending Mark was published for opposition on March 5, 2019. The 30-day opposition deadline does not close until after March 27, 2019. Applicant requests that its application be suspended until there is a final disposition of Application Serial No. 79/149,123 pursuant to TMEP § 716.02(c). B. Amendment to Identification of Goods Applicant has amended its identification of goods as requested by the Examining Attorney. C. Conclusion Applicant requests that the Examining Attorney suspend its application pending the disposition of the Prior Pending Mark, and accept Applicant’s amended identification of goods. |
|
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (current) | |
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 009 |
DESCRIPTION | |
Eyewear; eyewear cases; eyewear cords; audio-visual recordings; cases for holding compact discs, DVDs, and other electronic media; downloadable computer wallpaper and screen saver software; downloadable images in the fields of entertainment and music; electronic game programs; headphones and earphones | |
FILING BASIS | Section 1(b) |
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (proposed) | |
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 009 |
TRACKED TEXT DESCRIPTION | |
Eyewear; eyewear cases; eyewear cords; |
|
FINAL DESCRIPTION | |
Eyewear; eyewear cases; eyewear cords; audio-visual recordings featuring music; cases for holding compact discs, DVDs, and other electronic media; downloadable computer screen saver software; downloadable images in the fields of entertainment and music; electronic game programs; headphones and earphones | |
FILING BASIS | Section 1(b) |
SIGNATURE SECTION | |
RESPONSE SIGNATURE | /Jill M. Pietrini/ |
SIGNATORY'S NAME | Jill M. Pietrini |
SIGNATORY'S POSITION | Attorney of Record, CA Bar Member |
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER | 310-228-3700 |
DATE SIGNED | 03/25/2019 |
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY | YES |
FILING INFORMATION SECTION | |
SUBMIT DATE | Mon Mar 25 14:41:32 EDT 2019 |
TEAS STAMP | USPTO/ROA-XX.XXX.XXX.XXX- 20190325144132253662-8794 3274-62041141e392d7e6ffb7 ddb29ba8642dea255f637dad6 377b7d34990693e3cdee2-N/A -N/A-20190325142524683374 |
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020) |
THE APPLICATION SHOULD BE SUSPENDED
A. Request For Suspension Based On Cited Application
The Examining Attorney has potentially refused registration on the grounds that Applicant’s mark is likely to be confused with the pending application for the mark MUSE, Serial No. 79/149,123 in Classes 9 and 11, filed by Muse Concept (“Prior Pending Mark”). The Examining Attorney contends that if the Prior Pending Mark registers, Applicant’s mark may be refused registration under Section 2(d) because of a likelihood of confusion with the registered mark.
The Examining Attorney has also refused registration under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. §1052(d) on the grounds that Applicant’s mark is likely to be confused with the mark MUSE, Reg. No. 4,678,804 registered by Amused Inc. for “downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for accessing, aggregating and interacting with content, images and works of art on the lock screen and idle screen of mobile phones, handheld computers and other mobile computing devices, namely, for uploading and downloading electronic files on the lock screen and idle screen of mobile phones, handheld computers and other mobile computing devices” in Class 9 (“Cited Registration”).
Applicant elects to not address any specific arguments relating to a likelihood of confusion between its mark and Application Serial No. 79/149,123 or Reg. No. 4,678,804, at this time. The Prior Pending Mark was published for opposition on March 5, 2019. The 30-day opposition deadline does not close until after March 27, 2019.
Applicant requests that its application be suspended until there is a final disposition of Application Serial No. 79/149,123 pursuant to TMEP § 716.02(c).
B. Amendment to Identification of Goods
Applicant has amended its identification of goods as requested by the Examining Attorney.
C. Conclusion
Applicant requests that the Examining Attorney suspend its application pending the disposition of the Prior Pending Mark, and accept Applicant’s amended identification of goods.