NEWTV
Future TV Co., Ltd.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 87975137 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 5000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Stylized form |
| Attorney Name | Yue (Robert) Xu |
| Attorney Docket Number | 160267NEWT-U |
| Law Office Assigned | M60 |
| Employee Name | SMITH, BRIDGETT G |
Timeline
| 2016-09-02 | Application Filed |
| 2017-04-18 | Published for Opposition |
| 2018-01-23 | Abandon |
| 2018-01-23 | Location: TTAB |
| 2018-01-23 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Future TV Co., Ltd. |
| Entity Statement | limited company (ltd.) |
| Address | 2-501,5-1,East Area of KongGang BIZ Park No. 80, Huanhebei Road Tianjin FTA CN |
| Legal Entity Type | |
| Legal Entity State | CN |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 9 |
| U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
| International Codes: | 35 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101,102 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| CC0000 | Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark. |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2016-09-06 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2016-09-08 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | 2016-09-09 | 3 MPMK E:E-Mail |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2016-12-12 | 4 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2016-12-20 | 5 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2016-12-20 | 6 GNRT F:First Action |
| NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2016-12-20 | 7 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | 2017-02-17 | 8 ERTD I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | 2017-02-27 | 9 AITU A:Allowance for Publication |
| DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | 2017-02-17 | 10 DRRR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2017-02-28 | 11 DPCC D:Assigned to Examiner |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2017-02-28 | 12 CNSA P: |
| NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | 2017-03-01 | 13 MPMK E:E-Mail |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2017-03-08 | 14 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2017-03-10 | 15 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | 2017-03-29 | 16 NONP E:E-Mail |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2017-04-18 | 17 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | 2017-04-18 | 18 NPUB E:E-Mail |
| EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | 2017-05-16 | 19 ETOF T:TTAB Proceeding |
| OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | 2017-10-16 | 20 OP.I T:TTAB Proceeding |
| OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | 2018-01-23 | 21 OP.S T:TTAB Proceeding |
| OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | 2018-01-23 | 22 OP.T T:TTAB Proceeding |
| ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | 2018-01-23 | 23 ABN4 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | 2018-01-23 | 24 MAB4 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 