Notation to File

NOTE TO THE FILE

SERIAL NUMBER:            87554652

DATE:                                10/23/2017

NAME:                               mtierney

NOTE:         

Searched:                                                             
     Google                            
     Lexis/Nexis                       
     OneLook
     Wikipedia
     Acronym Finder                         Protest evidence reviewed
     Other:

Checked:                                                             
     Geographic significance          
     Surname                          
     Translation
     ID with ID/CLASS mailbox

     Checked list of approved Canadian attorneys and agents

Discussed file with
Attorney/Applicant via:
        phone                               Left message with
    X   email                               Attorney/Applicant

     Requested Law Library search           Issued Examiner’s Amendment
     for:                                   and entered changes in TRADEUPS

        PRINT        DO NOT PRINT           Added design code in TRADEUPS
     Description of the mark
     Translation statement                  Re-imaged standard character
                                            drawing
     Negative translation statement             
     Consent of living individual           Contacted TM MADRID ID/CLASS
                                            about misclassified definite ID
     Changed TRADEUPS to:

     OTHER:

Yes, thank you.

Karen Hammond | Director, Intellectual Property
The Scotts Company LLC
14111 Scottslawn Road | Marysville, OH 43041
P  937-578-1347 | C 937-305-9585 | F 937-644-7568
karen.hammond@scotts.com
www.scotts.com

 

 

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Tierney, Margery <Margery.Tierney@uspto.gov> wrote:

Completed.  I corrected “machines in the nature or” to “machines in the nature of.”

 

 

 

Margery A. Tierney

Trademark Attorney

Law Office 111

U. S. Patent & Trademark Office

571-272-9234

margery.tierney@uspto.gov

 

 

DISCLAIMER: Although a trademark examining attorney may provide explanations pertaining to refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) issued in a particular case, the trademark examining attorney may not provide legal advice or statements about an applicant’s rights. See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.

 

 

 

From: Hammond, Karen [mailto:karen.hammond@scotts.com]
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2017 1:46 PM
To: Tierney, Margery <Margery.Tierney@uspto.gov>
Subject: ORTHO--Serial No 87-554652

 

Dear Ms. Tierney,

You have issued an Office Action in the above-identified application, requesting clarification of the products in both Classes 7 and 21.  I have revised the recitations of goods pursuant to your recommendations.  

 

Class 7:          Machines in the nature or power-operated insect repellent foggers and sprayers; machines in the nature of insecticide foggers and sprayers.

 

Class 21:        Electric devices for attracting and killing insects; electric devices for repelling insects, namely ultrasonic devices for repelling insects; electric devices for repelling insects, namely lamps for repelling insects; insect traps.

 

 

If the foregoing is acceptable, please enter an examiner's amendment accordingly.  

 

If you have any further questions, please contact me.

 

Regards, Karen

Karen Hammond | Director, Intellectual Property
The Scotts Company LLC
14111 Scottslawn Road | Marysville, OH 43041
P  937-578-1347 | C 937-305-9585 | F 937-644-7568
karen.hammond@scotts.com
www.scotts.com