Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 87474609 |
Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
Law Office Assigned | M50 |
Employee Name | MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D |
2017-05-10 | Date of First Use |
2017-06-05 | Application Filed |
2018-04-16 | Abandon |
2018-04-16 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2018-09-14 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
2018-09-14 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | Matthew R. Walsh |
Address | 19197 Golden Valley Rd #333 Santa Clarita CA US 91350 |
Legal Entity Type | Individual |
Legal Entity State | US |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 9 |
U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0091 | Augmented reality software for use in mobile devices for integrating electronic data with real world environments for the purpose of experiencing an augmented level or world; Computer game software; Video game cartridges; Video game cartridges and cassettes; Video game cartridges and discs; Video game discs; Video game software; Video and computer game programs; Virtual reality game software; Virtual reality headsets; Computer software featuring musical sound recordings and musical video recordings; Computer software, namely, game engine software for video game development and operation; Downloadable computer game programs; Headsets for virtual reality games; Memory cards for video game machines; Series of musical sound recordings |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2017-06-08 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2017-06-09 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2017-09-05 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2017-09-07 | 4 CNRT R:Renewal |
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2017-09-07 | 5 GNRT F:First Action |
NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2017-09-07 | 6 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2017-09-13 | 7 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2017-09-13 | 8 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2017-09-15 | 9 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2017-10-13 | 10 CNFR R:Renewal |
FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2017-10-13 | 11 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | 2017-10-13 | 12 GNFN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | 2018-04-08 | 13 ERFR I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2018-04-08 | 14 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2018-04-09 | 15 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | 2018-04-16 | 16 ABN0 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | 2018-04-16 | 17 TPDR I:Incoming Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | 2018-04-17 | 18 MAB0 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | 2018-07-09 | 19 APET A:Allowance for Publication |
PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | 2018-09-14 | 20 PCDE O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.