Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 87348391 |
Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
Attorney Name | Domenica N.S. Hartman |
Attorney Docket Number | B6-4718 |
Law Office Assigned | N50 |
Employee Name | RADCLIFF, BRENT MARCUS |
2016-09-01 | Date of First Use |
2017-02-24 | Application Filed |
2017-08-29 | Published for Opposition |
2018-07-12 | Abandon |
2018-07-12 | Location: TTAB |
2018-07-12 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2018-12-14 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | Perma-Green Supreme, Inc. |
Address | 5609 Murvihill Road Valparaiso IN 46383 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | IN |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 7 |
U.S. Codes: | 013,019,021,023,031,034,035 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0071 | Mechanical spreader, in the nature of, agitator for spreading lawn-care products, namely, fertilizer, seed and salt; agitators for circulating liquid media |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2017-02-28 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2017-03-03 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | 2017-03-04 | 3 MPMK E:E-Mail |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2017-05-20 | 4 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | 2017-05-22 | 5 CPEA R:Renewal |
COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY | 2017-05-22 | 6 EPEN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | 2017-05-22 | 7 GEAP F:First Action |
NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | 2017-05-22 | 8 GEAN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2017-06-15 | 9 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2017-07-20 | 10 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2017-07-21 | 11 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2017-07-21 | 12 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2017-07-27 | 13 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | 2017-08-09 | 14 NONP E:E-Mail |
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2017-08-29 | 15 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | 2017-08-29 | 16 NPUB E:E-Mail |
TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2017-08-31 | 17 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2017-08-31 | 18 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | 2017-09-27 | 19 ETOF T:TTAB Proceeding |
OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | 2017-10-05 | 20 OP.I T:TTAB Proceeding |
OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | 2018-07-12 | 21 OP.S T:TTAB Proceeding |
OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | 2018-07-12 | 22 OP.T T:TTAB Proceeding |
ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | 2018-07-12 | 23 ABN4 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | 2018-07-12 | 24 MAB4 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | 2018-12-14 | 25 OP.S T:TTAB Proceeding |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.