To: | Akbarov, Akhror (akhrorakbarov@yahoo.com) |
Subject: | U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 87222248 - RP - N/A |
Sent: | 6/21/2017 8:21:55 AM |
Sent As: | ECOM106@USPTO.GOV |
Attachments: |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 87222248
MARK: RP
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp
|
APPLICANT: Akbarov, Akhror
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
|
OFFICE ACTION
TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW. A RESPONSE TRANSMITTED THROUGH THE TRADEMARK ELECTRONIC APPLICATION SYSTEM (TEAS) MUST BE RECEIVED BEFORE MIDNIGHT EASTERN TIME OF THE LAST DAY OF THE RESPONSE PERIOD.
ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 6/21/2017
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
This Office action is in response to applicant’s communication filed on May 7, 2017. Applicant submitted a proposed amendment to the drawing and amended identification of services but did not respond to the color claim and description of the mark requirements. Please note that the amended identification has been accepted. The Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion refusal has been withdrawn. However, the proposed amendment to the drawing has been rejected.
Drawing Amendment Not Acceptable – Material Alteration – Original Drawing Remains Operative
Applicant has requested that the drawing of the mark be amended. The original drawing shows the mark as RP in stylized form; the proposed amended drawing shows the mark as ReorderPad.
An amendment to a mark will not be accepted if the change would materially alter the mark in the initial application. 37 C.F.R. §2.72; TMEP §807.14. Determining whether a proposed amendment materially alters a mark involves comparing the proposed amended mark with the mark in the drawing filed with the original application. 37 C.F.R. §2.72; TMEP §807.14(d).
The test for material alteration is whether the modified mark retains what is the essence of the original mark; that is, whether the new and old forms create the impression of being essentially the same mark. In re Hacot-Columbier, 105 F.3d 616, 620, 41 USPQ2d 1523, 1526 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (quoting Visa Int’l Serv. Ass’n v. Life Code Sys., Inc., 220 USPQ 740, 743 (TTAB 1983)); see In re Nationwide Indus. Inc., 6 USPQ2d 1882, 1885 (TTAB 1988); TMEP §807.14. For example, if republication of the amended mark would be necessary to provide proper notice of the mark to third parties for opposition purposes, then the mark has been materially altered and the amendment is not permitted. In re Hacot-Columbier, 105 F.3d at 620, 41 USPQ2d at 1526 (quoting Visa Int’l Serv. Ass’n v. Life Code Sys., Inc., 220 USPQ at 743-44). Also, the addition of an element that would require a further search may be a factor in determining material alteration. In re Guitar Straps Online, LLC, 103 USPQ2d 1745, 1747 (TTAB 2012); In re Who? Vision Sys. Inc., 57 USPQ2d 1211, 1218 (TTAB 2000).
In the present case, the proposed amendment to the mark is refused because it would result in a material alteration of the mark depicted in the original application. TMEP §807.17; see 37 C.F.R. §2.72; In re Who? Vision Sys., Inc., 57 USPQ2d 1211 (holding proposed amendment from “TACILESENSE” to “TACTILESENSE” to be material alteration due to the difference in meaning or connotation between the marks); In re CTB Inc., 52 USPQ2d 1471 (TTAB 1999) (holding proposed amendment of TURBO and design to the typed word TURBO to be a material alteration due to the design being distinctive matter).
Specifically, the proposed amendment would materially alter the mark in the initial application because the sound, appearance, meaning and commercial impression of the original mark of two letters RP are significantly and completely different from the proposed amendment of the wording ReorderPad.
Accordingly, the proposed amendment will not be entered; the previous drawing of the mark will remain operative. TMEP §807.17.
The following requirements are maintained and continued.
Color Claim Amendment Required
Applicant has submitted a color drawing and provided the required color claim. Applications for marks depicted in color must include a complete list of all the colors claimed as a feature of the mark. 37 C.F.R. §2.52(b)(1); see TMEP §§807.07(a) et seq.
However, the color claim contains wording such as “ReorderPad” that does not describe a color. Said wording must be deleted from the color claim.
If black, white and/or gray are not being claimed as a color feature of the mark, applicant must state that the colors black, white and/or gray represent background, outlining, shading and/or transparent areas and are not part of the mark. TMEP §807.07(d). Generic color names must be used to identify the colors in the mark, e.g., magenta, yellow, turquoise. TMEP §807.07(a)(i)-(a)(ii).
Therefore, applicant must provide the required color claim. The following is suggested, if accurate: “The colors DARK GRAY and BLUE are claimed as a feature of the mark.” TMEP §807.07(a)(i).
Description Amendment Required – Description Inaccurate
The description of the mark is inaccurate because it contains wording that does not appear anywhere on the mark. Specifically, the wording “ReorderPad” does not appear anywhere on the mark. Applications for marks not in standard characters must include an accurate and concise description of the entire mark that identifies literal elements as well as any design elements. See 37 C.F.R. §2.37; TMEP §§808.02, 808.03(d).
Therefore, applicant must provide a more accurate description of the applied-for mark. The following is suggested:
The mark consists of the stylized letter R in dark gray overlapped the stylized letter P in blue. The color white represents the background and is not claimed as a feature of the mark.
Response Guidelines
For this application to proceed further, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement raised in this Office action. If the action includes a refusal, applicant may provide arguments and/or evidence as to why the refusal should be withdrawn and the mark should register. Applicant may also have other options specified in this Office action for responding to a refusal and should consider those options carefully. To respond to requirements and certain refusal response options, applicant should set forth in writing the required changes or statements. For more information and general tips on responding to USPTO Office actions, response options, and how to file a response online, see “Responding to Office Actions” on the USPTO’s website.
If applicant does not respond to this Office action within six months of the issue/mailing date, or responds by expressly abandoning the application, the application process will end and the trademark will fail to register. See 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.65(a), 2.68(a); TMEP §§718.01, 718.02. Additionally, the USPTO will not refund the application filing fee, which is a required processing fee. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(i)-(iv), 2.209(a); TMEP §405.04.
When an application has abandoned for failure to respond to an Office action, an applicant may timely file a petition to revive the application, which, if granted, would allow the application to return to active status. See 37 C.F.R. §2.66; TMEP §1714. The petition must be filed within two months of the date of issuance of the notice of abandonment and may be filed online via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) with a $100 fee. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(15)(ii), 2.66(b)(1).
TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp. Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application. For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov. For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney. E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.
All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.
WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE: It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants). If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response.
/Sally Shih/
Sally Shih
Trademark Examining Attorney
United States Patent & Trademark Offce
571-272-9712
sally.shih@uspto.gov
PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION: To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/. Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen. If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199. For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.
TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS: Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.