POP-I
Playform, Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 87207208 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Attorney Name | Bradley J. Walz |
| Attorney Docket Number | 77421-288897 |
| Law Office Assigned | M70 |
| Employee Name | LE, KHANH M |
Timeline
| 2016-10-18 | Application Filed |
| 2019-02-06 | Location: PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION |
| 2019-02-06 | Status: Live/Pending |
| 2019-02-06 | Transaction Date |
| 2019-03-12 | Published for Opposition |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Playform, Inc. |
| Address | 23644 Maple Springs Drive Diamond Bar DE 91765 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | DE |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 9 |
| U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0091 | Computer hardware; electronic displays, namely, digital signage; digital electronic devices for receiving, playing, and reviewing text, data, image, and video files; computer hardware and software for viewing or playing video, photographs and other digital images, and other multimedia content |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2016-10-21 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2016-10-21 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2017-01-26 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | 2017-01-31 | 4 CNSL R:Renewal |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | 2017-01-31 | 5 GNSL F:First Action |
| NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | 2017-01-31 | 6 GNS3 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2017-08-11 | 7 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2017-08-11 | 8 RCSC S: |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2018-02-05 | 9 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2018-02-20 | 10 RCSC S: |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2018-08-30 | 11 RCSC S: |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2018-12-28 | 12 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | 2019-01-11 | 13 ERSI I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2019-01-16 | 14 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2019-01-16 | 15 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2019-02-04 | 16 CNSA P: |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2019-02-06 | 17 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | 2019-02-20 | 18 NONP E:E-Mail |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2019-03-12 | 19 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | 2019-03-12 | 20 NPUB E:E-Mail |
| NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2019-05-07 | 21 NOAM E:E-Mail |
| ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2019-12-09 | 22 ABN6 S: |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2019-12-09 | 23 MAB6 E:E-Mail |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 