Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 87171549 |
Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
Attorney Name | Kathryn Grant Belleau |
Attorney Docket Number | TS1009 |
Law Office Assigned | M30 |
Employee Name | PARKS, KIMBERLY L |
2016-09-14 | Application Filed |
2019-06-04 | Abandon |
2019-07-10 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
2019-07-10 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2019-07-10 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | Pitney Bowes Inc. |
Address | 3001 Summer Street Stamford DE 06926 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | DE |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 9 |
U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0091 | Electronic connectivity device for use in the fields of communications, and mail and parcel processes, processing and solutions; computer hardware in the fields of communications, and mail and parcel processes, processing and solutions; computer software for enabling the electronic device to communicate with postage meters for use in the fields of communications, and mail and parcel processes, processing and solutions; Ethernet cables; wireless communication apparatus and devices, namely, communication hubs; electronic devices enabling the interface between a mailing machine and the cloud through an internet connection to update solutions, data and postage on the mailing machine |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2016-09-17 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2016-09-19 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | 2016-09-20 | 3 MPMK E:E-Mail |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2016-11-27 | 4 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2016-11-28 | 5 CNRT R:Renewal |
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2016-11-28 | 6 GNRT F:First Action |
NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2016-11-28 | 7 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2017-05-22 | 8 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2017-05-22 | 9 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2017-05-23 | 10 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | 2017-05-30 | 11 CNSL R:Renewal |
LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | 2017-05-30 | 12 GNSL S: |
NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | 2017-05-30 | 13 GNS3 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2017-11-30 | 14 RCSC S: |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2018-05-30 | 15 RCSC S: |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2018-12-03 | 16 CNRT R:Renewal |
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2018-12-03 | 17 GNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2018-12-03 | 18 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2019-07-09 | 19 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2019-07-10 | 20 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2019-07-10 | 21 MAB2 E:E-Mail |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.