To: | Hua Zhang (memorytechcenter@hotmail.com) |
Subject: | U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 87162638 - NP NOVOPAL - N/A - Request for Reconsideration Denied - No Appeal Filed |
Sent: | 9/12/2017 2:02:24 PM |
Sent As: | ECOM122@USPTO.GOV |
Attachments: |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 87162638
MARK: NP NOVOPAL
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/index.jsp
|
APPLICANT: Hua Zhang
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
|
REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION DENIED
ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 9/12/2017
The trademark examining attorney has carefully reviewed applicant’s request for reconsideration and is denying the request for the reasons stated below. See 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(3); TMEP §§715.03(a)(ii)(B), 715.04(a). The following refusal made final in the Office action dated April 13, 2017 is maintained and continues to be final: specimen does not show use of the mark with the goods. See TMEP §§715.03(a)(ii)(B), 715.04(a).
In the present case, applicant’s request has not resolved the outstanding issue, nor does it raise a new issue or provide any new or compelling evidence with regard to the outstanding issue in the final Office action. Specifically, the substitute specimen does not show the applied-for mark in the drawing in use in commerce because the mark on the substitute specimen does not match the mark in the drawing. Specifically, the specimen displays the mark as NOVOPAL, without stylization or color, and with the letters NP missing; however, the drawing displays the mark as NP NOVOPAL, with stylization and color. The drawing shows the mark sought to be registered, and must be a substantially exact representation of the mark as used on or in connection with the goods. 37 C.F.R. §2.51(a); TMEP §807.12(a). Because the mark on the specimen is not a substantially exact representation of the mark in the drawing, applicant has failed to provide the required evidence of use of the applied-for mark in commerce on or in connection with applicant’s goods. See TMEP §807.12(a).
Accordingly, the request is denied.
If applicant has already filed a timely notice of appeal with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, the Board will be notified to resume the appeal. See TMEP §715.04(a).
If no appeal has been filed and time remains in the six-month response period to the final Office action, applicant has the remainder of the response period to (1) comply with and/or overcome any outstanding final requirement(s) and/or refusal(s), and/or (2) file a notice of appeal to the Board. TMEP §715.03(a)(ii)(B); see 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(1)-(3). The filing of a request for reconsideration does not stay or extend the time for filing an appeal. 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(3); see TMEP §§715.03, 715.03(a)(ii)(B), (c).
/Xheneta Ademi/
Examining Attorney
Law Office 122
(571) 272-7151
xheneta.ademi@uspto.gov