GREEN GORILLA
Green Gorilla, Inc.
Application Filed: 2015-09-04
Trademark Application Details
ABANDONED-FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 86980801 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 3000: Illustration: Drawing or design which also includes word(s)/ letter(s)/number(s) |
| Attorney Name | Daniel M. Cislo |
| Attorney Docket Number | 15-30441 |
| Law Office Assigned | L80 |
| Employee Name | LOOK, JEFFREY J |
Timeline
| 2015-05-20 | Date of First Use |
| 2015-09-04 | Application Filed |
| 2018-02-01 | Abandon |
| 2018-02-16 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2018-02-16 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Green Gorilla, Inc. |
| Address | 7080 Hollywood Blvd., Suite 1100 Los Angeles NV 90028 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | NV |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Design Search Codes
| 031101 | Primates other than humans; Apes; Baboons; Chimpanzees; Gorillas; Lemurs; Monkeys; Orangutans |
| 031124 | Stylized primates |
| 050325 | Leaf, single; Other leaves |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 5 |
| U.S. Codes: | 006,018,044,046,051,052 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| CC0000 | The color(s) green is/are claimed as a feature of the mark. |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2015-09-08 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2015-09-09 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | 2015-09-10 | 3 MDSC E:E-Mail |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2015-10-20 | 4 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2015-10-21 | 5 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2015-10-22 | 6 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2015-10-29 | 7 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2015-10-29 | 8 GNRT F:First Action |
| NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2015-10-29 | 9 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2016-03-30 | 10 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2016-04-15 | 11 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2016-04-22 | 12 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2016-04-22 | 13 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2016-06-09 | 14 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2016-06-09 | 15 GNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2016-06-09 | 16 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | 2016-10-20 | 17 ERTD I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2016-10-20 | 18 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2016-10-24 | 19 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2016-10-24 | 20 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | 2016-11-01 | 21 AITU A:Allowance for Publication |
| DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | 2016-10-20 | 22 DRRR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2016-11-01 | 23 DPCC D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | 2016-11-02 | 24 MDSC E:E-Mail |
| FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2016-11-14 | 25 CNFR R:Renewal |
| FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2016-11-14 | 26 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | 2016-11-14 | 27 GNFN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | 2017-05-11 | 28 ERTD I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | 2017-05-11 | 29 EXAF T:TTAB Proceeding |
| JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2017-05-11 | 30 JURT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | 2017-05-11 | 31 EXPI T:TTAB Proceeding |
| TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | 2017-05-11 | 32 ERFR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | 2017-05-25 | 33 AITU A:Allowance for Publication |
| ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | 2017-05-25 | 34 INCD O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| FAX RECEIVED | 2017-05-31 | 35 FAXX I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2017-06-08 | 36 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2017-06-08 | 37 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2017-06-08 | 38 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2017-07-31 | 39 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2017-07-31 | 40 GNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2017-07-31 | 41 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | 2017-05-11 | 42 DRRR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2018-01-25 | 43 DPCC D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2018-02-16 | 44 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2018-02-16 | 45 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | 2018-02-16 | 46 EXPT T:TTAB Proceeding |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 