Reconsideration Letter

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application

 

 

 

REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

AFTER FINAL ACTION

DENIED

 

 

Issue date:  April 06, 2020

 

 

Applicant’s request for reconsideration is denied.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(3).  The trademark examining attorney has carefully reviewed applicant’s request and determined the request did not:  (1) raise a new issue, (2) resolve all the outstanding issue(s), (3) provide any new or compelling evidence with regard to the outstanding issue(s), or (4) present analysis and arguments that were persuasive or shed new light on the outstanding issue(s).  TMEP §§715.03(a)(ii)(B), 715.04(a). 

 

SECTION 2(F) CLAIM – DATES DO NOT SUPPORT 5 YEARS’ USE

 

Applicant’s Trademark Act Section 2(f) claim based on five years’ use is insufficient to show acquired distinctiveness because applicant’s dates of use of the mark indicate that applicant has not actually used the mark in commerce for the requisite time period.  See 15 U.S.C. §1052(f).  For this claim to be accepted, applicant’s substantially exclusive and continuous use of the mark in commerce that the U.S. Congress may lawfully regulate must have been for at least five years before the date on which the claim is made.  15 U.S.C. §1052(f); 37 C.F.R. §2.41(a)(2); TMEP §1212.05.  And such use must have been in a type of commerce that may be regulated by the U.S. Congress.  See 15 U.S.C. §§1052(f), 1127.

 

In the present case, applicant asserted a claim of acquired distinctiveness on March 25, 2020.  Five years prior to this date would be approximately February 16, 2021.  However, the date of first use in commerce specified in the March 30, 2018 Statement of Use is February 16, 2016, which is less than five years prior to the date the distinctiveness claim was made.

 

As an alternative to claiming acquired distinctiveness under Section 2(f), applicant may request to amend the application to seek registration on the Supplemental Register.  See 15 U.S.C. §1091(a); 37 C.F.R. §§2.47, 2.75(a); TMEP §§801.02(b), 816.  To amend to the Supplemental Register, the mark must be in lawful use in commerce; however, no specific length of use is required.  See 15 U.S.C. §1091(a); 37 C.F.R. §2.47(a); TMEP §815.02.

 

Additionally, applicant provided affidavits and declarations from applicant’s employees, officers, and/or attorney to support applicant’s claim that the applied-for mark acquired distinctiveness under Trademark Act Section 2(f).  See 15 U.S.C. §1052(f).  Although consumer affidavits and declarations that assert recognition of a mark as an indicator of source are relevant in establishing acquired distinctiveness, affidavits and declarations of an applicant’s employees, officers, and attorneys are usually self-serving and entitled to little weight.  See In re David Crystal, Inc., 296 F.2d 771, 773, 132 USPQ 1, 2 (C.C.P.A. 1961); In re Gray Inc., 3 USPQ2d 1558, 1560 (TTAB 1987); In re Cent. Counties Bank, 209 USPQ 884, 888 (TTAB 1981); TMEP §1212.06(c).

 

Accordingly, the following requirement(s) and/or refusal(s) made final in the Office action dated October 16, 2019 are maintained and continued: 

 

            •  Disclaimer requirement

 

See TMEP §§715.03(a)(ii)(B), 715.04(a). 

 

If applicant has already filed an appeal with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, the Board will be notified to resume the appeal.  See TMEP §715.04(a).

 

If applicant has not filed an appeal and time remains in the six-month response period, applicant has the remainder of that time to (1) file another request for reconsideration that complies with and/or overcomes any outstanding final requirement(s) and/or refusal(s), and/or (2) file a notice of appeal to the Board.  TMEP §715.03(a)(ii)(B).  Filing a request for reconsideration does not stay or extend the time for filing an appeal.  37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(3); see TMEP §715.03(c). 

 

 

Andrea D. Saunders

/Andrea D. Saunders/

Trademark Attorney

Law Office 117

571-270-3856

Andrea.Saunders@uspto.gov

 

 

 

 

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

 

USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE

 

Office Action (Official Letter) has issued

on April 06, 2020 for

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 86882884

 

Your trademark application has been reviewed by a trademark examining attorney.  As part of that review, the assigned attorney has issued an official letter that you must respond to by the specified deadline or your application will be abandoned.  Please follow the steps below.

 

(1)  Read the official letter.

 

(2)  Direct questions about the contents of the Office action to the assigned attorney below. 

 

 

Andrea D. Saunders

/Andrea D. Saunders/

Trademark Attorney

Law Office 117

571-270-3856

Andrea.Saunders@uspto.gov

 

 

Direct questions about navigating USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website, the application process, the status of your application, and/or whether there are outstanding deadlines or documents related to your file to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).

 

(3)  Respond within 6 months (or earlier, if required in the Office action) from April 06, 2020, using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  The response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  See the Office action for more information about how to respond

 

 

 

GENERAL GUIDANCE

·       Check the status of your application periodically in the Trademark Status & Document Retrieval (TSDR) database to avoid missing critical deadlines.

 

·       Update your correspondence email address, if needed, to ensure you receive important USPTO notices about your application.

 

·       Beware of misleading notices sent by private companies about your application.  Private companies not associated with the USPTO use public information available in trademark registrations to mail and email trademark-related offers and notices – most of which require fees.  All official USPTO correspondence will only be emailed from the domain “@uspto.gov.”