TIGO
Shenzhen Taobang Network Technology Co., Ltd
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 86848997 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 5000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Stylized form |
| Law Office Assigned | L70 |
| Employee Name | DINALLO, KEVIN M |
Timeline
| 2015-08-11 | Date of First Use |
| 2015-12-15 | Application Filed |
| 2016-09-13 | Published for Opposition |
| 2017-04-04 | Abandon |
| 2017-04-04 | Location: TTAB |
| 2017-04-04 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Shenzhen Taobang Network Technology Co., Ltd |
| Address | Shajing St. Baoan Dist. Shenzhen, Guangdon CN |
| Legal Entity Type | Limited Liability Company |
| Legal Entity State | CN |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 11 |
| U.S. Codes: | 013,021,023,031,034 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| CC0000 | Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark. |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2015-12-18 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2015-12-19 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2016-03-31 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2016-03-31 | 4 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2016-03-31 | 5 GNRT F:First Action |
| NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2016-03-31 | 6 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2016-07-25 | 7 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2016-07-25 | 8 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2016-07-25 | 9 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2016-07-29 | 10 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2016-08-05 | 11 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2016-08-05 | 12 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2016-08-09 | 13 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2016-08-09 | 14 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | 2016-08-24 | 15 NONP E:E-Mail |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2016-09-07 | 16 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2016-09-13 | 17 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | 2016-09-13 | 18 NPUB E:E-Mail |
| EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | 2016-10-07 | 19 ETOF T:TTAB Proceeding |
| OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | 2016-12-01 | 20 OP.I T:TTAB Proceeding |
| OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | 2017-04-04 | 21 OP.S T:TTAB Proceeding |
| OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | 2017-04-04 | 22 OP.T T:TTAB Proceeding |
| ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | 2017-04-04 | 23 ABN4 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | 2017-04-04 | 24 MAB4 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 