LIFESUPPLYUSA
Dust-Trap Distributions LLC
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 86827398 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Attorney Name | Gerard F. Dunne |
| Attorney Docket Number | 7466-008 |
| Law Office Assigned | N20 |
| Employee Name | BODRI, JOHN PETER |
Timeline
| 2015-11-20 | Application Filed |
| 2016-06-07 | Published for Opposition |
| 2016-08-02 | Location: INTENT TO USE SECTION |
| 2017-03-06 | Abandon |
| 2017-03-06 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Dust-Trap Distributions LLC |
| Address | 200 West 67th St, 19d New York NY 10023 |
| Legal Entity Type | Limited Liability Company |
| Legal Entity State | NY |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 10 |
| U.S. Codes: | 026,039,044 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0101 | adult sexual stimulation aids, namely, benwa balls and sex toys, namely, harnesses |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2015-11-25 | 1 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | 2015-11-26 | 2 MPMK E:E-Mail |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2016-03-14 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | 2016-03-21 | 4 CPEA R:Renewal |
| COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY | 2016-03-21 | 5 EPEN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | 2016-03-21 | 6 GEAP F:First Action |
| NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | 2016-03-21 | 7 GEAN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2016-03-28 | 8 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2016-03-28 | 9 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2016-03-29 | 10 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | 2016-04-06 | 11 ERTD I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2016-04-22 | 12 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | 2016-04-26 | 13 AITU A:Allowance for Publication |
| DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | 2016-04-06 | 14 DRRR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2016-04-26 | 15 DPCC D:Assigned to Examiner |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2016-04-27 | 16 CNSA P: |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2016-05-04 | 17 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | 2016-05-18 | 18 NONP E:E-Mail |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2016-06-07 | 19 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | 2016-06-07 | 20 NPUB E:E-Mail |
| NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2016-08-02 | 21 NOAM E:E-Mail |
| ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2017-03-06 | 22 ABN6 S: |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2017-03-06 | 23 MAB6 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 