Research |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Serial Number | 86788243 |
Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
Attorney Name | David J. Davis |
Attorney Docket Number | 151069 |
Law Office Assigned | M10 |
Employee Name | NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNE |
1999-01-31 | Date of First Use |
2015-10-14 | Application Filed |
2017-03-01 | Abandon |
2017-04-03 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
2017-04-03 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | ![]() |
Address | 35 W. Wacker Drive Chicago DE 60601 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | DE |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 35 |
U.S. Codes: | 100,101,102 |
International Codes: | 41 |
U.S. Codes: | 100,101,107 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0351 | Advertising agency services; planning and purchasing media time for advertisements of others and promoting events of others; providing advertising consulting services in the field of facilitating the planning, buying and selling of media and the development of advertising content; marketing research and analysis services; preparing and placing advertisements for others; marketing, advertising, content development and brand consulting in the field of brand communication strategy services; marketing and advertising consulting services for others, namely, media planning services and media buying services and the development of marketing and advertising content; Branding services, namely, analysis and consulting on brands for businesses; advertising consultation, namely, providing analysis, attribution information, reporting and optimization recommendations for online advertising content; content marketing services; creation of advertising content; curation of advertising content |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2015-10-17 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2015-10-19 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | 2015-10-20 | 3 MPMK E:E-Mail |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2016-02-04 | 4 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2016-02-09 | 5 CNRT R:Renewal |
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2016-02-09 | 6 GNRT F:First Action |
NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2016-02-09 | 7 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2016-08-09 | 8 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2016-08-09 | 9 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2016-08-10 | 10 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2016-08-31 | 11 CNFR R:Renewal |
FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2016-08-31 | 12 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | 2016-08-31 | 13 GNFN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2017-04-03 | 14 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2017-04-03 | 15 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2017-04-03 | 16 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.