NANOVISION

nanoView Diagnostics, Inc.

Application Filed: 2015-06-12

Trademark Application Details

Status

604

Dead/Abandoned

ABANDONED - AFTER INTER-PARTES DECISION

Research	OneLook Acronym Finder
Serial Number	86660825
Mark Drawing Code	4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form
Attorney Name	Matthew H. Swyers,
Attorney Docket Number	24020
Law Office Assigned	L60
Employee Name	SALEMI, DOMINICK J

Timeline

2015-06-12	Application Filed
2015-10-27	Published for Opposition
2016-06-04	Abandon
2016-06-04	Status: Dead/Abandoned
2016-06-16	Location: TTAB
2018-07-08	Transaction Date

Trademark Applicants & Owners

Owner:	nanoView Diagnostics, Inc.
Address	8 Saint Mary's St. Boston DE 02215
Legal Entity Type	Corporation
Legal Entity State	DE

Documents

Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.

Attorney of Record

MATTHEW H SWYERS
THE TRADEMARK COMPANY
344 MAPLE AVE W PMB 151
VIENNA, VA 22180-5612

Good, Services, and Codes

International Codes:	9
U.S. Codes:	021,023,026,036,038

Type Code	Type
GS0091	Scientific instrumentation for measuring nanoparticles

Trademark Filing History

Description	Date	Event Coding
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM	2015-06-16	1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence
NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM	2015-06-16	2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	2015-09-22	3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	2015-09-22	4 CNSA P:
NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED	2015-10-07	5 NONP E:E-Mail
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	2015-10-27	6 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication
OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED	2015-10-27	7 NPUB E:E-Mail
EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED	2015-11-20	8 ETOF T:TTAB Proceeding
OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999	2016-02-24	9 OP.I T:TTAB Proceeding
OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999	2016-02-24	10 OP.I T:TTAB Proceeding
OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999	2016-06-04	11 OP.S T:TTAB Proceeding
OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999	2016-06-04	12 OP.T T:TTAB Proceeding
ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION	2016-06-04	13 ABN4 O:Outgoing Correspondence
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION	2016-06-06	14 MAB4 O:Outgoing Correspondence
OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999	2016-06-16	15 OP.S T:TTAB Proceeding
OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999	2016-06-16	16 OP.T T:TTAB Proceeding

Similar Marks

Mark Image Registration \| Serial	Company Trademark Application Date
NANOVISION 97359463 not registered Live/Pending	Auritec Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2022-04-12
NANOVISION 86660825 not registered Dead/Abandoned	nanoView Diagnostics, Inc. 2015-06-12
NANOVISION 85667992 not registered Dead/Abandoned	NanoLumens, Inc. 2012-07-03
NANOVISION 85193913 not registered Dead/Abandoned	BioPharma Scientific, LLC 2010-12-09
NANOVISION 78639338 not registered Dead/Abandoned	Nanobac Life Sciences, Inc 2005-05-27
NANOVISION 77126148 3737361 Dead/Cancelled	Rothman, M.D., Richard 2007-03-08
NANOVISION 77067724 not registered Dead/Abandoned	Martin, Dale E 2006-12-19
NANOVISION 76248672 not registered Dead/Abandoned	Nanovision, Inc. 2001-04-30
NANOVISION 74386319 1933575 Dead/Cancelled	TOPOMETRIX CORP. 1993-04-30

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.