P2
Eco Balanced Technologies, Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 86659836 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 3000: Illustration: Drawing or design which also includes word(s)/ letter(s)/number(s) |
| Law Office Assigned | L20 |
| Employee Name | KUYKENDALL, LYNDSEY |
Timeline
| 2014-12-16 | Date of First Use |
| 2015-06-11 | Application Filed |
| 2016-09-16 | Abandon |
| 2017-02-08 | Location: PETITIONS OFFICE |
| 2017-02-08 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Eco Balanced Technologies, Inc. |
| Address | 225 Lincoln Highway Suite 213 Fairless Hills NV 19030 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | NV |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Design Search Codes
| 260117 | Circles, two concentric; Concentric circles, two; Two concentric circles |
| 260121 | Circles that are totally or partially shaded. |
| 260921 | Squares that are completely or partially shaded |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 3 |
| U.S. Codes: | 001,004,006,050,051,052 |
| International Codes: | 5 |
| U.S. Codes: | 006,018,044,046,051,052 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| CC0000 | The color(s) green (92C039), aqua (00A4B0), orange (F48221), royal blue (017DC7) is/are claimed as a feature of the mark. |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2015-06-20 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2015-06-23 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | 2015-06-24 | 3 MDSM E:E-Mail |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2015-09-21 | 4 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2015-09-22 | 5 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2015-09-22 | 6 GNRT F:First Action |
| NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2015-09-22 | 7 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2016-02-15 | 8 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2016-02-19 | 9 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2016-02-26 | 10 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2016-02-26 | 11 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2016-03-15 | 12 CNFR R:Renewal |
| FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2016-03-15 | 13 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | 2016-03-15 | 14 GNFN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2016-10-11 | 15 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2016-10-11 | 16 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | 2016-12-08 | 17 PROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2016-12-08 | 18 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | 2016-12-22 | 19 APET A:Allowance for Publication |
| INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | 2016-12-23 | 20 PINM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | 2017-02-08 | 21 PETD O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 