The mark consists of the stylized wording "COMPACT INTUITIV" and a design of the letters "C" and "I" in a circle.
Mark For: COMPACT INTUITIV™ trademark registration is intended to cover the category of
>Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark. The mark consists of the stylized wording "COMPACT INTUITIV" and a design of the letters "C" and "I" in a circle.
Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 86620519 |
Mark Literal Elements | COMPACT INTUITIV |
Mark Drawing Type | 3 - AN ILLUSTRATION DRAWING WHICH INCLUDES WORD(S)/ LETTER(S)/NUMBER(S) |
Mark Type | TRADEMARK |
Standard Character Claim | No |
Register | PRINCIPAL |
Current Location | TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED 2023-02-23 |
Basis | 1(b) |
Class Status | ACTIVE |
Primary US Classes |
|
Primary International Class |
|
Filed Use | No |
Current Use | No |
Intent To Use | Yes |
Filed ITU | Yes |
44D Filed | No |
44E Current | No |
66A Current | No |
Current Basis | No |
No Basis | No |
Attorney Name | Marci A. Blazer |
Attorney Docket Number | T42801US1 |
Law Office Assigned | L10 |
Employee Name | MICHELI, ANGELA M |
2015-05-06 | Application Filed |
2019-09-30 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 |
2019-09-30 | Status: Live/Pending |
2019-09-30 | Transaction Date |
2023-02-23 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
2023-02-23 | Status: Abandoned because the applicant failed to respond or filed a late response to an Office action. To view all documents in this fi |
Party: | JOHNSON & JOHNSON SURGICAL VISION, INC. |
Address | 1700 E. ST. ANDREW PLACE SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES 92705 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | DELAWARE |
Party: | JOHNSON & JOHNSON SURGICAL VISION, INC. |
Address | 1700 E. ST. ANDREW PLACE SANTA ANA DE 92705 |
Legal Entity Type | |
Legal Entity State | DE |
Application | 2015-05-06 | |
Drawing | 2015-05-06 | |
Design Search Code Corr Project | 2015-05-16 | |
XSearch Search Summary | 2015-08-19 | |
Offc Action Outgoing | 2015-08-25 | |
Response to Office Action | 2016-02-08 | |
Amendment and Mail Process Complete | 2016-02-09 | |
Suspension Letter | 2016-03-10 | |
TEAS Rev, App and/or COA of Atty/Dom.Rep | 2018-06-11 | |
Offc Action Outgoing | 2022-08-10 | |
ABANDONMENT-Notice | 2023-02-23 | |
Notice of Abandonment | 2023-02-23 |
26.01.20 | Circles within a circle |
26.01.21 | Circles that are totally or partially shaded. |
260103 | Circles, incomplete (more than semi |
260120 | Circles within a circle |
260121 | Circles that are totally or partially shaded. |
(ABANDONED)
IC 010. US 026 039 044. G & S: System comprising an ultrasound generator used in the phacoemulsification of ophthalmic lenses
International Codes: | 10 |
U.S. Codes: | 026,039,044 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
CC0000 | Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark. |
Description | Date |
---|---|
Trademark Assignment 6378-0957 [7 Pages] | 2018-05-01 |
Description | Date | Proceeding Number |
---|---|---|
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2023-02-23 | |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2023-02-23 | |
ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2023-02-23 | |
NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | 2022-08-10 | |
FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2022-08-10 | 67971 |
FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2022-08-10 | |
SUSPENSION CHECKED TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | 2022-06-22 | 88889 |
SUSPENSION CHECKED TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | 2022-06-03 | 88889 |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2021-11-02 | 88889 |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2021-04-28 | 70468 |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2020-10-15 | 70468 |
ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2020-10-12 | 70468 |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2020-03-30 | 68171 |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2019-09-30 | 68171 |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2019-03-27 | 68171 |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2018-09-26 | 68171 |
AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | 2018-07-18 | |
TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2018-06-11 | |
ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2018-06-11 | |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2018-03-20 | 68171 |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2017-09-20 | 68171 |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2017-03-20 | 68171 |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2016-09-19 | 68171 |
ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2016-09-15 | 68171 |
SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | 2016-03-10 | 67971 |
NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | 2016-03-10 | 6332 |
LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | 2016-03-10 | 6332 |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2016-02-08 | 88889 |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2016-02-08 | |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2016-02-08 | 88889 |
NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2015-08-25 | 6325 |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2015-08-25 | 67971 |
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2015-08-25 | 6325 |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2015-08-18 | 67971 |
NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | 2015-05-16 | |
NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | 2015-05-15 | |
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | 2015-05-09 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.