KORE
Kore Method New York LLC
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 86448349 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Attorney Name | Ruth Khalsa |
| Law Office Assigned | M60 |
| Employee Name | SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE |
Timeline
| 2014-11-07 | Application Filed |
| 2015-10-27 | Abandon |
| 2015-11-03 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2015-11-03 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2019-03-27 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Kore Method New York LLC |
| Address | 420 East 80th St. #6D New York NY 10075 |
| Legal Entity Type | Limited Liability Company |
| Legal Entity State | NY |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 41 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101,107 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0411 | Education and entertainment services,namely Fitness training services, Physical fitness conditioning classes, physical fitness instruction and consultation; Providing classes, workshops and seminars in the fields of fitness and exercise; Providing fitness and exercise facilities; Providing a web site featuring information on exercise and physical fitness accessible through a global computer network and mobile devices; On-line journals, namely, blogs featuring the topics regarding local exercise, fitness, fitness training, fitness classes, fitness instruction, nutrition, health, wellness, and personal development |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2014-11-11 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2014-11-17 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | 2014-11-18 | 3 MPMK E:E-Mail |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2015-02-27 | 4 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2015-03-06 | 5 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2015-03-06 | 6 GNRT F:First Action |
| NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2015-03-06 | 7 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2015-03-24 | 8 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2015-03-30 | 9 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2015-04-01 | 10 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2015-04-01 | 11 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2015-04-24 | 12 CNFR R:Renewal |
| FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2015-04-24 | 13 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | 2015-04-24 | 14 GNFN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2015-11-03 | 15 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2015-11-03 | 16 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2019-03-27 | 17 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2019-03-27 | 18 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 