CIP
Fuld-Gilad-Herring Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 86348329 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Attorney Name | Douglas R. Wolf |
| Attorney Docket Number | F0642.20001U |
| Law Office Assigned | M20 |
| Employee Name | LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN |
Timeline
| 2001-00-00 | Date of First Use |
| 2014-07-25 | Application Filed |
| 2015-10-16 | Abandon |
| 2015-12-04 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2015-12-04 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Fuld-Gilad-Herring Academy of Competitive Intelligence LLC |
| Address | 131 Oliver Street, Third Floor Boston DE 02110 |
| Legal Entity Type | Limited Liability Company |
| Legal Entity State | DE |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 42 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0421 | testing, analysis, and evaluation of the knowledge, skills, and abilities of others for the purpose of certification in the field of competitive intelligence |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2014-08-04 | 1 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2014-08-14 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | 2014-08-21 | 3 CPRA R:Renewal |
| PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | 2014-08-21 | 4 GPRA F:First Action |
| NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | 2014-08-21 | 5 GPRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2014-10-28 | 6 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2014-10-29 | 7 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2014-11-04 | 8 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2014-11-04 | 9 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2014-11-25 | 10 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2014-11-25 | 11 GNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2014-11-25 | 12 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2015-03-25 | 13 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2015-03-26 | 14 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2015-03-26 | 15 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2015-04-15 | 16 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2015-04-15 | 17 GNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2015-04-15 | 18 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2015-12-03 | 19 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2015-12-04 | 20 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2015-12-04 | 21 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | 2015-12-30 | 22 UNDN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 