To: | SHENZHEN ZUN YI PIN TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD (mjwilliams@mjw-law.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Registration No. 4572255 - TESLA - N/A |
Sent: | 08/30/19 09:27:49 AM |
Sent As: | prg@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Owner’s Trademark Registration
U.S. Registration No. 4572255
Mark: TESLA
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Owner: SHENZHEN ZUN YI PIN TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD
|
|
Reference/Docket No. N/A
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
The USPTO must receive the owner’s response to this letter within the time period specified below. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears below.
Issue date: August 30, 2019
The Sections 8 & 15 Combined Affidavit received on August 26, 2019, is otherwise acceptable; however, the owner of the registration must comply with an audit as explained below.
Registration Selected for Audit
The USPTO is performing random audits of US trademark registrations to assess and promote the accuracy and integrity of the trademark register. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.161(h), 7.37(h). This registration has been randomly selected for audit to determine whether the mark is in use with all of the goods identified in the registration.
Detailed information regarding the audit program is provided on the following webpage – http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks-maintaining-trademark-registration/post-registration-audit-program.
To comply with the audit, you must submit proof of use of the registered mark for two additional goods per class. Id. If proof of use for the goods selected is not available, those goods and any other goods for which the mark is not currently in use should be deleted from the registration.
Therefore, the owner must submit the following:
(1) Proof of current use of the registered mark in commerce for the following goods:
· Tobacco pouches;
· Cigarette paper; and
(2) The following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20: “The owner was using the mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods identified in the registration for which use of the mark in commerce is claimed, as evidenced by the submitted proof of use, during the relevant period for filing the affidavit of use.” 37 C.F.R. §§2.161(h), 7.37(h).
Additionally, you must identify the corresponding goods that each individual piece of evidence of current proof of use supports. See id.
Acceptable proof of use for goods includes photographs that show the mark on the actual goods or packaging, or photographs of displays associated with the actual goods at their point of sale. A tag or label that is not shown affixed to the goods is not acceptable proof of use. Similarly, a package that does not show or identify the goods therein is not acceptable proof of use.
Form Declaration
Please note that the below statement verifying proof of use is slightly different than the standard substitute specimen statement.
The following statement and declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20 can be used to verify the use of the mark as evidenced by the item(s) submitted as proof of use, if properly signed and dated:
The owner was using the mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods identified in the registration for which use of the mark in commerce is claimed, as evidenced by the submitted proof of use, during the relevant period for filing the affidavit of use.
The signatory being warned that willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. §1001, and that such willful false statements and the like may jeopardize the validity of this submission, declares that the facts set forth above are true; all statements made of his/her own knowledge are true; and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true.
__________________________
Signature of Authorized Person
__________________________
Type or Print Name
__________________________
Date
WARNING: If your response to this Office action does not meet the requirements of the audit, or includes a request to delete goods selected for the audit, and goods remain in the registration without acceptable proof of use, a second Office action will issue requiring proof of use for all remaining goods for which proof of use is not of record. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.161(h), 7.37(h). Therefore, the owner r should delete all goods for which proof of use cannot be provided.
ADVISORY: If a response to this Office action is not filed within the response deadline above, and time remains in the grace period, the owner may avoid cancellation of its registration by filing a new affidavit of use within the grace period. 37 C.F.R. §2.163(c). Additional fees are required to file a new affidavit during the grace period. 37 C.F.R. §2.161(d)(1)-(2). For more information about this, please contact the undersigned.
The USPTO proposes to change federal trademark rules to require applicants and registrants to (1) file submissions concerning applications and registrations online using the USPTO’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) and (2) provide and maintain an accurate email address for receiving correspondence from the USPTO. See the Mandatory Electronic Filing Rules webpage for more information.
How to respond. Click to file a Response to Post-Registration Office action.
Direct questions about this Office action to the Post Registration staff member below.
/Betty Chang/
Examining Attorney
Law Office 115
571-272-6517
bettychang@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE