UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.

 

ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 9/17/2014

 

 

This Office action is in response to applicant’s communication filed on August 15, 2014.

 

In that response, applicant satisfied the requirement to claim ownership of its prior registration. 

 

In addition, applicant submitted a proposed amendment to its identification of goods.  For the reasons set forth below, the proposed amendment cannot be accepted. 

 

Please note that a new requirement to provide additional information relating to the goods is set forth below.

 

Please also note that the Section 2(d) refusals are moot/withdrawn in light of the cancellation of the two cited registrations.

 

Identification of Goods Must Be Clarified

 

The identification of goods, as amended is indefinite and must be clarified.  See TMEP §1402.01.  Please see suggested identification below for specific wording that requires clarification.

 

Please note that an application must specify, in an explicit manner, the particular goods or services on or in connection with which the applicant uses, or has a bona fide intention to use, the mark in commerce.  See 15 U.S.C. §1051(a)(2), (b)(2); 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01.  Therefore, proper punctuation in identifications of goods and services is necessary to delineate explicitly each product or service within a list and to avoid ambiguity.  Generally, commas should be used (1) to separate a series of related items identified within a particular category of goods or services, (2) before and after “namely,” and (3) between each item in a list of goods or services following “namely.”  TMEP §1402.01(a).  Semicolons generally should be used to separate a series of distinct categories of goods or services within an international class.  Id.

 

For example, the identification of goods “cleaners, namely, glass cleaners, deodorizers for pets, cosmetics” is ambiguous because “cosmetics” and “deodorizers for pets” are not “cleaners,” and thus are not within this category of goods even though they are all in the same international class.  Id.  However, by replacing the commas with semicolons after “glass cleaners” and “deodorizers for pets,” this identification would become acceptable:  “cleaners, namely, glass cleaners; deodorizers for pets; cosmetics.”  Id.

 

In addition to wording in the proposed amendment being indefinite, wording in the proposed amendment to the identification is not acceptable because it exceeds the scope of the identification in the U.S. application.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §§1402.06 et seq., 1402.07.  The original identification in the U.S. application, and any previously accepted amendments, remain operative for purposes of future amendment.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.07(d).

 

An acceptable identification of goods and/or services is required in a U.S. application.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(6), 2.71(a); TMEP §§805, 1402.01.  An applicant may only amend an identification to clarify or limit the goods and/or services, but not to add to or broaden the scope of the goods and/or services.  37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); see TMEP §§1402.06 et seq., 1402.07.  Scope is generally determined by the ordinary meaning of the wording in the identification.  TMEP §1402.07(a). 

 

The U.S. application originally identified the goods and/or services as follows:  “hand tools, namely, wire-wrap products, bench tools and related products, impact or punch down tools.”

 

However, the proposed amendment identifies the following goods that are beyond the scope of the original identification:  “integrated circuit (IC) insertion and extraction tools, burnishers, alignment tools, and push-pull force gauges, electrical tools, in the nature of hollow shaft nut drivers, panel knockout kit, and extra long screwdrivers to reach the back of rectifiers”.  Thus, the identification, incorporating this amendment, is not acceptable.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(6), 2.71(a); TMEP §§805, 1402.01.  If these goods are in fact a type of wire-wrap hand tool, a bench tool or and impact/punch down tool, then applicant must specifically amend its identification of goods to include this clarification. 

 

 

Applicant may adopt the following identification, if accurate.  Please note that bolded wording/punctuation indicates a suggested addition(s)/amendment(s) to applicant’s current identification and wording/punctuation with a line through it indicates language of which the examining attorney is suggesting deletion. 

 

Class 8:

 

“Hand tools, namely, wire-wrap products in the nature of hand tools for making coiled wire terminal connections, connections;  bench tools and related products in the nature of pliers, wrenches, hand tools for connecting fiber-optic fiber-optics and cable cables connector  tools, wire fishing hand tools, sewing and pulling hand tools, and wire cutting and stripping hand tools, tools; integrated circuit (IC) insertion and extraction tools, burnishers, alignment tools, and push-pull force gauges, electrical tools, in the nature of hollow shaft nut drivers, panel knockout kit, and extra long screwdrivers to reach the back of rectifiers, impact or punch down tools in the nature of hand tools to properly seat and trim wires used with insulation displacement connectors.”

 

 

For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual at http://tess2.gov.uspto.report/netahtml/tidm.html.  See TMEP §1402.04. 

 

 

Additional Information Required

 

 

To permit proper examination of the application, applicant must submit additional product information about the goods.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.61(b); In re AOP LLC, 107 USPQ2d 1644, 1650-51 (TTAB 2013); In re Cheezwhse.com, Inc., 85 USPQ2d 1917, 1919 (TTAB 2008); In re DTI P’ship LLP, 67 USPQ2d 1699, 1701-02 (TTAB 2003); TMEP §814.  The requested product information should include fact sheets, instruction manuals, and/or advertisements.  If these materials are unavailable, applicant should submit similar documentation for goods of the same type, explaining how its own product will differ.  If the goods feature new technology and no competing goods are available, applicant must provide a detailed description of the goods.

 

The submitted factual information must make clear how the goods operate, their salient features, and their prospective customers and channels of trade.  Conclusory statements regarding the goods will not satisfy this requirement.

 

Failure to comply with a request for information can be grounds for refusing registration.  In re AOP LLC, 107 USPQ2d at 1651; In re DTI P’ship LLP, 67 USPQ2d at 1701-02; TMEP §814.  Merely stating that information about the goods is available on applicant’s website is an inappropriate response to a request for additional information and is insufficient to make the relevant information of record.  See In re Planalytics, Inc., 70 USPQ2d 1453, 1457-58 (TTAB 2004).

 

 

Responding to this Office Action

 

 

For this application to proceed toward registration, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement raised in this Office action.  If the action includes a refusal, applicant may provide arguments and/or evidence as to why the refusal should be withdrawn and the mark should register.  Applicant may also have other options for responding to a refusal and should consider such options carefully.  To respond to requirements and certain refusal response options, applicant should set forth in writing the required changes or statements.

 

If applicant does not respond to this Office action within six months of the issue/mailing date, or responds by expressly abandoning the application, the application process will end, the trademark will fail to register, and the application fee will not be refunded.  See 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.65(a), 2.68(a), 2.209(a); TMEP §§405.04, 718.01, 718.02.  Where the application has been abandoned for failure to respond to an Office action, applicant’s only option would be to file a timely petition to revive the application, which, if granted, would allow the application to return to active status.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.66; TMEP §1714.  There is a $100 fee for such petitions.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.6, 2.66(b)(1).

 

 

If applicant has an amendment that does not require the payment of a fee, submission of a specimen, response to a statutory refusal or declaration signature, applicant is encouraged to telephone the examining attorney to expedite the processing of the application.  

 

 

Telephone/Email Suggested for Questions

 

 

If applicant has questions regarding this Office action, please telephone or e-mail the assigned trademark examining attorney.  All relevant e-mail communications will be placed in the official application record; however, an e-mail communication will not be accepted as a response to this Office action and will not extend the deadline for filing a proper response.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05.  Further, although the trademark examining attorney may provide additional explanation pertaining to the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action, the trademark examining attorney may not provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights.  See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.

 

 

 

 

 

 

/Meghan Reinhart/

Examining Attorney

Law Office 108

(571) 272-2943

meghan.reinhart@uspto.gov

 

 

TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:  Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.  Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application.  For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov.  For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney.  E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.

 

All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.

 

WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE:  It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants).  If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response. 

 

PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION:  To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/.  Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen.  If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199.  For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.

 

TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS:  Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.

 

 

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

 

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING YOUR

U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

USPTO OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) HAS ISSUED

ON 9/17/2014 FOR U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 86148571

 

Please follow the instructions below:

 

(1)  TO READ THE LETTER:  Click on this link or go to http://tsdr.uspto.gov,enter the U.S. application serial number, and click on “Documents.”

 

The Office action may not be immediately viewable, to allow for necessary system updates of the application, but will be available within 24 hours of this e-mail notification.

 

(2)  TIMELY RESPONSE IS REQUIRED:  Please carefully review the Office action to determine (1) how to respond, and (2) the applicable response time period.  Your response deadline will be calculated from 9/17/2014 (or sooner if specified in the Office action).  For information regarding response time periods, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/responsetime.jsp.

 

Do NOT hit “Reply” to this e-mail notification, or otherwise e-mail your response because the USPTO does NOT accept e-mails as responses to Office actions.  Instead, the USPTO recommends that you respond online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) response form located at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.

 

(3)  QUESTIONS:  For questions about the contents of the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney.  For technical assistance in accessing or viewing the Office action in the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system, please e-mail TSDR@uspto.gov.

 

WARNING

 

Failure to file the required response by the applicable response deadline will result in the ABANDONMENT of your application.  For more information regarding abandonment, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/basics/abandon.jsp.

 

PRIVATE COMPANY SOLICITATIONS REGARDING YOUR APPLICATION:  Private companies not associated with the USPTO are using information provided in trademark applications to mail or e-mail trademark-related solicitations.  These companies often use names that closely resemble the USPTO and their solicitations may look like an official government document.  Many solicitations require that you pay “fees.” 

 

Please carefully review all correspondence you receive regarding this application to make sure that you are responding to an official document from the USPTO rather than a private company solicitation.  All official USPTO correspondence will be mailed only from the “United States Patent and Trademark Office” in Alexandria, VA; or sent by e-mail from the domain “@uspto.gov.”  For more information on how to handle private company solicitations, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/solicitation_warnings.jsp.