AGILITY
Nucraft Furniture Company
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 86101286 |
| Registration Number | 4631122 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Attorney Name | Brittany R. Harden |
| Attorney Docket Number | 15773-4 |
| Law Office Assigned | L80 |
| Employee Name | DAWE III, WILLIAM H |
Timeline
| 2012-12-01 | Date of First Use |
| 2013-10-25 | Application Filed |
| 2014-08-19 | Published for Opposition |
| 2014-11-04 | Location: PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION |
| 2014-11-04 | Status: Live/Registered |
| 2014-11-04 | Trademark Registered |
| 2019-11-04 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Nucraft Furniture Company |
| Address | 5151 West River Drive Comstock Park MI 49321 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | MI |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 20 |
| U.S. Codes: | 002,013,022,025,032,050 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0201 | Office furniture, namely, conference tables |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2013-10-29 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2013-10-31 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2013-12-27 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2013-12-27 | 4 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2013-12-27 | 5 GNRT F:First Action |
| NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2013-12-27 | 6 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2014-06-27 | 7 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2014-07-15 | 8 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2014-07-16 | 9 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | 2014-07-30 | 10 NONP E:E-Mail |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2014-08-19 | 11 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | 2014-08-19 | 12 NPUB E:E-Mail |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2014-11-04 | 13 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2019-02-27 | 14 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2019-02-27 | 15 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | 2019-11-04 | 16 REM1 E:E-Mail |
| TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | 2020-10-12 | 17 E815 I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | 2021-01-14 | 18 APRE A:Allowance for Publication |
| POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | 2021-01-14 | 19 PR23 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | 2021-02-17 | 20 EROP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | 2021-03-06 | 21 C15A O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | 2021-03-06 | 22 NA85 E:E-Mail |
| COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | 2023-11-04 | 23 REM2 E:E-Mail |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 