Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 85978584 |
Registration Number | 5748040 |
Mark Drawing Code | 5000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Stylized form |
Attorney Name | Sujata Chaudhri |
Attorney Docket Number | 28639.027;sz |
Law Office Assigned | M50 |
Employee Name | LEWIS, SHAILA E |
2011-04-27 | Application Filed |
2013-08-13 | Published for Opposition |
2019-04-09 | Location: PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION |
2019-04-09 | Status: Live/Pending |
2019-04-09 | Transaction Date |
2019-05-14 | Trademark Registered |
Owner: | TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED |
Address | Nirmal Building, 9th Fl. Nariman Point, Mumbai Maharashtra IN 400021 |
Legal Entity Type | Company |
Legal Entity State | IN |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 9 |
U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
International Codes: | 37 |
U.S. Codes: | 100,103,106 |
International Codes: | 38 |
U.S. Codes: | 100,101,104 |
International Codes: | 42 |
U.S. Codes: | 100,101 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0421 | Drafting, designing and creation of computer hardware and software and consultancy thereof; creation, hosting and maintenance of websites; Scientific and technological services, namely, providing virtual computer systems and virtual computer environments through cloud computing; Scientific and technological services, namely, research, development, design and upgrading of computer networking hardware and software, and computer database management; Scientific and technological services, namely, providing integrated information and communication technology solution software for small and medium businesses in manufacturing, wellness, education, retail, restaurant, textile and professional services industries; Research and development of new products; Technical support services, namely, remote and on-site infrastructure management services for monitoring, administration and management of public and private cloud computing IT and application systems; Quality control for others |
CC0000 | The color(s) blue and yellow is/are claimed as a feature of the mark. |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2011-04-30 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2011-05-02 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2011-06-26 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2011-06-27 | 4 CNRT R:Renewal |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2011-06-28 | 5 CNRT F:First Action |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2011-12-27 | 6 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2011-12-27 | 7 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2011-12-27 | 8 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | 2012-01-17 | 9 CNSL R:Renewal |
LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 2012-01-18 | 10 CNSL S: |
ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2012-07-18 | 11 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
LIE CHECKED SUSP - TO ATTY FOR ACTION | 2012-07-18 | 12 RCCK S: |
SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | 2012-08-14 | 13 CNSI R:Renewal |
INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | 2012-08-14 | 14 CNSI S: |
TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | 2013-02-13 | 15 ERSI I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2013-02-15 | 16 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2013-02-15 | 17 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | 2013-02-21 | 18 ERTD I:Incoming Correspondence |
CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | 2013-03-05 | 19 AITU A:Allowance for Publication |
DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | 2013-02-21 | 20 DRRR I:Incoming Correspondence |
DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2013-03-08 | 21 DPCC D:Assigned to Examiner |
SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | 2013-03-28 | 22 CNSL R:Renewal |
LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 2013-03-28 | 23 CNSL S: |
TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | 2013-04-19 | 24 ERSI I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2013-06-19 | 25 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2013-06-19 | 26 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2013-06-25 | 27 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | 2013-06-25 | 28 ZZZX Z:Deletion |
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2013-06-26 | 29 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2013-07-09 | 30 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2013-07-24 | 31 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2013-08-13 | 32 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | 2013-08-22 | 33 EWAF I:Incoming Correspondence |
EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | 2013-09-11 | 34 ETOF T:TTAB Proceeding |
OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | 2014-02-07 | 35 OP.I T:TTAB Proceeding |
OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | 2019-04-08 | 36 OP.D T:TTAB Proceeding |
OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | 2019-04-08 | 37 OP.T T:TTAB Proceeding |
TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | 2019-04-08 | 38 TMBN T:TTAB Proceeding |
REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2019-05-14 | 39 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.