Notation to File

NOTE TO THE FILE

SERIAL NUMBER:            85966693

DATE:                                03/18/2016

NAME:                               gulrich

NOTE:         

Searched:                                                             Discussed ID with:
     Google                                 Senior Atty
     Lexis/Nexis                            Managing Atty
     OneLook
     Wikipedia
     Acronym Finder                         Protest evidence reviewed
     Other:

Checked:                                                              Discussed Geo. Sig. with:
     Geographic significance                Senior Atty
     Surname                                Managing Atty 
     Translation
     ID with ID/CLASS mailbox

     Checked list of approved Canadian attorneys and agents

Discussed file with
Attorney/Applicant via:
        phone                               Left message with
    X   email                               Attorney/Applicant

     Requested Law Library search           Issued Examiner’s Amendment
     for:                                   and entered changes in TRADEUPS

        PRINT        DO NOT PRINT         Added design code in TRADEUPS
     Description of the mark
     Translation statement                  Re-imaged standard character
                                            drawing
     Negative translation statement             
     Consent of living individual           Contacted TM MADRID ID/CLASS
                                            about misclassified definite ID
     Changed TRADEUPS to:

     OTHER:

Dear Mr. Fredbeck:

Thank you  for your voicemail. Please provide me with the specific questions or concerns that you have regarding this application and I will be happy to address them.

Please note that “[i]nformal communications may not be used to request advisory opinions as to the likelihood of overcoming a substantive refusal.” TMEP §709.05. Additionally, arguments against substantive refusals will not be considered in informal communications.  If the applicant or applicant’s attorney wishes for arguments against a refusal to be considered, they must be filed via a formal response. See  TMEP §709.05. 

 

Kind Regards,

 

N. Gretchen Ulrich
Trademark Examining Attorney
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
Phone: (571) 272-1951
gretchen.ulrich@uspto.gov

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain information that is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, purge it and do not disseminate or copy it.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.