RESTAURANT IN A BOX
Mitesh Gala
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 85925384 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Attorney Name | Ravi Mahalingam |
| Law Office Assigned | L60 |
| Employee Name | ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN |
Timeline
| 2013-04-15 | Date of First Use |
| 2013-05-07 | Application Filed |
| 2014-09-08 | Abandon |
| 2014-10-01 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2015-03-11 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Mitesh Gala |
| Address | 3191 Red Hill Ave #100 Costa Mesa CA US 92626 |
| Legal Entity Type | Individual |
| Legal Entity State | US |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 35 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101,102 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0351 | Offering business management assistance in the establishment and/or operation of restaurants; On-line ordering services in the field of restaurant take-out and delivery |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2013-05-10 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2013-05-14 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2013-08-25 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2013-09-04 | 4 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2013-09-04 | 5 GNRT F:First Action |
| NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2013-09-04 | 6 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2014-02-04 | 7 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2014-02-04 | 8 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2014-02-05 | 9 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2014-03-06 | 10 CNFR R:Renewal |
| FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2014-03-06 | 11 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | 2014-03-06 | 12 GNFN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | 2014-08-26 | 13 ERFR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2014-08-28 | 14 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2014-09-05 | 15 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2014-09-05 | 16 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | 2014-10-01 | 17 ABN0 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | 2014-10-01 | 18 MAB0 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | 2014-11-13 | 19 TPDR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | 2014-12-01 | 20 APET A:Allowance for Publication |
| PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | 2015-03-11 | 21 PCDE O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Company Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
 RESTAURANT IN A BOX 87846678 not registered Dead/Abandoned |
Dhuvad, Hirenkumar 2018-03-23 |
 RESTAURANT IN A BOX 85925384 not registered Dead/Abandoned |
Mitesh Gala 2013-05-07 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 