Research |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Serial Number | 85830818 |
Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
Attorney Name | Michael J. Bevilacqua |
Attorney Docket Number | 2207.221.127 |
Law Office Assigned | L40 |
Employee Name | LUDEMAN, JESSICA ANN |
2013-01-23 | Application Filed |
2013-12-31 | Published for Opposition |
2014-02-25 | Location: INTENT TO USE SECTION |
2014-09-29 | Abandon |
2014-09-29 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | ![]() |
Address | 530 Lytton Avenue c/o Inventus Law, Inc. Palo Alto DE 94301 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | DE |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 9 |
U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0091 | computer display and input system comprised of a capacitive touch-screen or an in-cell-electronic display screen, camera, video projector, computer software for displaying images and detecting objects, user gestures/inputs and commands and furniture encasing the aforementioned system, all sold as unit; computer software and computer hardware for enabling touch computing and object recognition; computer hardware; NFC readers; printers; server software and server hardware for controlling and managing computer hardware; computer operating system |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2013-01-26 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2013-01-29 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | 2013-01-30 | 3 MPMK O:Outgoing Correspondence |
TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | 2013-02-05 | 4 PARI I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | 2013-02-05 | 5 TAEA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2013-02-02 | 6 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2013-05-06 | 7 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2013-05-07 | 8 CNRT R:Renewal |
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2013-05-07 | 9 GNRT F:First Action |
NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2013-05-07 | 10 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2013-10-31 | 11 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2013-11-04 | 12 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2013-11-12 | 13 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2013-11-12 | 14 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2013-11-19 | 15 CNSA P: |
LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2013-11-22 | 16 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | 2013-12-11 | 17 NONP E:E-Mail |
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2013-12-31 | 18 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | 2013-12-31 | 19 NPUB E:E-Mail |
NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2014-02-25 | 20 NOAM E:E-Mail |
ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2014-09-29 | 21 ABN6 S: |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2014-09-29 | 22 MAB6 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.