BUHAY
Matick, Joseph
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 85640823 |
| Registration Number | 4323293 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 3000: Illustration: Drawing or design which also includes word(s)/ letter(s)/number(s) |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Attorney Name | /Hillel Frankel/ |
| Law Office Assigned | M60 |
| Employee Name | FLETCHER, TRACY L |
Timeline
| 2012-05-01 | Date of First Use |
| 2012-06-01 | Application Filed |
| 2013-02-05 | Published for Opposition |
| 2013-04-23 | Location: PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION |
| 2013-04-23 | Trademark Registered |
| 2019-11-29 | Cancelled |
| 2019-11-29 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2019-12-02 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Matick, Joseph |
| Address | 3179 N. Church Rd Vincinnes IN US 47591 |
| Legal Entity Type | Individual |
| Legal Entity State | US |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Design Search Codes
| 011525 | Coal; Dust; Light rays; Liquids, spilling; Pouring liquids; Sand; Spilling liquids |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 41 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101,107 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| CC0000 | The color(s) Black Blue and Green is/are claimed as a feature of the mark. |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2012-06-05 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2012-06-11 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | 2012-06-12 | 3 MDSC O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2012-09-19 | 4 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2012-09-26 | 5 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2012-09-26 | 6 GNRT F:First Action |
| NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2012-09-26 | 7 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2012-12-07 | 8 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2012-12-07 | 9 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2012-12-08 | 10 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2012-12-09 | 11 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2012-12-27 | 12 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2012-12-29 | 13 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | 2013-01-16 | 14 NONP E:E-Mail |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2013-02-05 | 15 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | 2013-02-05 | 16 NPUB E:E-Mail |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2013-04-23 | 17 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2015-01-23 | 18 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | 2018-04-23 | 19 REM1 E:E-Mail |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2019-01-24 | 20 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2019-01-24 | 21 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | 2019-11-29 | 22 C8.. O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 