Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 85578783 |
Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
Attorney Name | Kelly J. Kubasta |
Attorney Docket Number | 8388-007 |
Law Office Assigned | M60 |
Employee Name | YARD, JOHN S |
2012-03-23 | Application Filed |
2013-07-31 | Abandon |
2013-08-16 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
2013-08-16 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | Motio, Inc. |
Address | Suite 475 18333 Preston Road Dallas TX 75252 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | TX |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 9 |
U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0091 | Computer software to manage, analyze, retrieve, monitor, maintain, report on, structure, model, forecast, present and display data and information from various databases; Computer software that provides real-time, integrated business management intelligence by combining information from various databases and presenting it in an easy-to-understand user interface; Computer software to automate data warehousing; Computer software for computer systems for application development, deployment and management; and Computer application software for personal computers or servers, namely, software for use in business intelligence for testing, benchmarking and optimizing business intelligence content and systems |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2012-03-27 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2012-03-30 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2012-06-16 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2012-06-18 | 4 CNRT R:Renewal |
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2012-06-18 | 5 GNRT F:First Action |
NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2012-06-18 | 6 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
FAX RECEIVED | 2012-11-30 | 7 FAXX I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2012-12-06 | 8 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2012-12-06 | 9 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2012-12-06 | 10 ACEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2013-01-30 | 11 CNFR R:Renewal |
FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2013-01-30 | 12 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | 2013-01-30 | 13 GNFN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | 2013-07-30 | 14 ERFR I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2013-07-30 | 15 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2013-07-31 | 16 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | 2013-08-16 | 17 ABN0 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | 2013-08-16 | 18 MAB0 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2015-03-03 | 19 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2015-03-03 | 20 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.