POWERAMP
Petrov, Maksim
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 85517428 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Attorney Name | Ross A. Dannenberg |
| Attorney Docket Number | 007967.00002 |
| Law Office Assigned | M70 |
| Employee Name | SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN |
Timeline
| 2010-11-08 | Date of First Use |
| 2012-01-16 | Application Filed |
| 2012-06-19 | Published for Opposition |
| 2012-10-04 | Abandon |
| 2012-10-16 | Location: |
| 2012-10-16 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Petrov, Maksim |
| Address | Moscow Region Semahsko st. 17-4 Mytischi RU 141014 |
| Legal Entity Type | Sole Proprietorship |
| Legal Entity State | RU |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 9 |
| U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0091 | computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for playing audio files, software for organizing audio files and runtime software for processing played audio |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2012-01-19 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2012-01-20 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | 2012-01-21 | 3 MPMK O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2012-04-23 | 4 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | 2012-04-30 | 5 CPRA R:Renewal |
| PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | 2012-04-30 | 6 GPRA F:First Action |
| NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | 2012-04-30 | 7 GPRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | 2012-05-01 | 8 CNEA R:Renewal |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | 2012-05-01 | 9 GNEA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | 2012-05-01 | 10 GNEN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | 2012-05-01 | 11 XAEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2012-05-01 | 12 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2012-05-16 | 13 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2012-05-16 | 14 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | 2012-05-30 | 15 NONP E:E-Mail |
| LETTER OF PROTEST ACCEPTED | 2012-06-15 | 16 LOPT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2012-06-19 | 17 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | 2012-06-19 | 18 NPUB E:E-Mail |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2012-07-02 | 19 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | 2012-07-16 | 20 ETOF T:TTAB Proceeding |
| TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | 2012-10-04 | 21 EXAR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | 2012-10-16 | 22 ABN5 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | 2012-10-16 | 23 MAB5 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 