ONCOSPACE
The Johns Hopkins University
Application Filed: 2011-12-14
Trademark Application Details
ABANDONED - DEFECTIVE STATEMENT OF USE
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 85495019 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Attorney Name | Elaine P. Spector |
| Attorney Docket Number | P10271-10 |
| Law Office Assigned | M50 |
| Employee Name | HINES, REGINA C |
Timeline
| 2011-12-14 | Application Filed |
| 2012-09-11 | Published for Opposition |
| 2013-12-09 | Location: INTENT TO USE SECTION |
| 2015-12-02 | Abandon |
| 2015-12-02 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  The Johns Hopkins University |
| Address | 5th Floor 100 N Charles Street Baltimore MD 21201 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | MD |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 42 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0421 | Providing an Internet-based database of radiation therapy patient data designed to facilitate data sharing with medical professionals and others for purposes of comparative effectiveness research and clinical quality control in the field of personalized medicine |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2011-12-17 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2011-12-21 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | 2011-12-22 | 3 MPMK O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2012-03-23 | 4 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2012-03-28 | 5 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2012-03-28 | 6 GNRT F:First Action |
| NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2012-03-28 | 7 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2012-07-11 | 8 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2012-07-11 | 9 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2012-07-11 | 10 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | 2012-08-06 | 11 CPRA R:Renewal |
| PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | 2012-08-06 | 12 GPRA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | 2012-08-06 | 13 GPRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | 2012-08-08 | 14 CNEA R:Renewal |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | 2012-08-08 | 15 GNEA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | 2012-08-08 | 16 GNEN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2012-08-08 | 17 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | 2012-08-08 | 18 XAEC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2012-08-08 | 19 CNSA P: |
| LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | 2012-08-09 | 20 PREV O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | 2012-08-22 | 21 NONP E:E-Mail |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2012-09-11 | 22 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | 2012-09-11 | 23 NPUB E:E-Mail |
| NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2012-11-06 | 24 NOAM E:E-Mail |
| TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2013-05-06 | 25 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 1 FILED | 2013-05-06 | 26 EXT1 S: |
| EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | 2013-05-06 | 27 EX1G S: |
| NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | 2013-05-08 | 28 EXRA E:E-Mail |
| TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2013-11-06 | 29 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | 2013-12-09 | 30 AITU A:Allowance for Publication |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | 2013-12-09 | 31 AITU A:Allowance for Publication |
| EXTENSION 2 FILED | 2013-11-06 | 32 EXT2 S: |
| EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | 2013-12-16 | 33 EX2G S: |
| NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | 2013-12-17 | 34 EXRA E:E-Mail |
| TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2014-05-06 | 35 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 3 FILED | 2014-05-06 | 36 EXT3 S: |
| EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | 2014-05-12 | 37 EX3G S: |
| NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | 2014-05-13 | 38 EXRA E:E-Mail |
| TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2014-11-05 | 39 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 4 FILED | 2014-11-05 | 40 EXT4 S: |
| EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | 2014-11-13 | 41 EX4G S: |
| NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | 2014-11-14 | 42 EXRA E:E-Mail |
| TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | 2015-05-06 | 43 EEXT I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 5 FILED | 2015-05-05 | 44 EXT5 S: |
| EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | 2015-05-27 | 45 EX5G S: |
| NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | 2015-05-28 | 46 EXRA E:E-Mail |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2015-11-04 | 47 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| USE AMENDMENT FILED | 2015-11-04 | 48 IUAF S: |
| USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | 2015-12-02 | 49 IUFF S: |
| ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | 2015-12-02 | 50 ABN7 S: |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | 2015-12-02 | 51 MAB7 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 