To: | Atlas Roofing Corporation (nixonptomail@nixonvan.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Registration No. 4306086 - INTEGRITY - DJB-1288-403 |
Sent: | 09/17/19 02:20:37 PM |
Sent As: | prg@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Owner’s Trademark Registration
U.S. Registration No. 4306086
Mark: INTEGRITY
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Owner: Atlas Roofing Corporation
|
|
Reference/Docket No. DJB-1288-403
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
The USPTO must receive the owner’s response to this letter within the time period specified below. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears below.
Issue date: September 17, 2019
Your response to the outstanding Office action regarding the Sections 8 & 15 Combined Affidavit, was timely received on September 12, 2019.
Requirements for Audit Not Satisfied
As part of the audit to assess and promote the accuracy and integrity of the trademark register as to the actual use of the mark with the goods identified in the registration, the owner of the registration was required to submit proof of use for two additional goods per class. 37 C.F.R. §§2.161(h), 7.37(h). Although the owner submitted a response to the Office action, the owner did not sufficiently respond to the requirements of the audit.
As warned in the prior office action, if your response to the first Office action does not meet the requirements of the audit and goods remain in the registration without acceptable proof of use, a second Office action will issue requiring proof of use for all remaining goods for which proof of use is not of record.
Specifically, you have established acceptable proof of use for:
· rigid insulation or foam insulation for use in production of insulated doors
· insulating building products, namely, expanded polystyrene (eps) insulation for commercial and residential applications in the construction industry, namely, expanded polystyrene (eps) insulation for
o exterior doors
o door panels
· insulating materials, in international class 17
The proof of use provided is unacceptable because it consists of advertising material for goods and does not show use of the registered mark on the goods or on packaging for the goods. See TMEP §904.04(b)-(c).
Material that functions merely to tell prospective purchasers about the goods, or to promote the sale of the goods, is unacceptable to show trademark use. TMEP §904.04(b). Invoices, business cards, announcements, price lists, listings in trade directories, order forms, bills of lading, leaflets, brochures, advertising circulars and other printed advertising material, while normally acceptable for showing use in connection with services, generally are not acceptable specimens for showing trademark use in connection with goods. See In re MediaShare Corp., 43 USPQ2d 1304, 1307 (TTAB 1997); In re Schiapparelli Searle, 26 USPQ2d 1520, 1522 (TTAB 1993); TMEP §904.04(b)-(c).
As the owner has not satisfied the requirements of the audit, the owner must verify the accuracy of the claim of use in the affidavit of use by providing proof of use for all the remaining goods in the registration without acceptable proof of use. Id.
Therefore, the owner must submit the following:
(1) Proof of current use of the registered mark in commerce for the following goods:
· rigid insulation or foam insulation for use in production of
o construction products,
o building products,
o pre-cast concrete,
o spa covers,
o general packaging,
o recreational vehicle,
o automotive accessories,
o lost foam,
o food storage or other related products;
· insulating building products, namely, expanded polystyrene (eps) insulation for commercial and residential applications in the construction industry, namely, expanded polystyrene (eps) insulation for
o roofs,
o walls,
o floors,
o basements,
o foundations,
o garage doors,
o sips,
o sun rooms
o and decks;
· expanded polystyrene (eps) insulation for
o spa covers,
o recreational vehicles;
· polystyrene (eps) packaging foam;
· oem automotive and rv foam cores;
· foam protective packaging materials, namely,
o shape molded foam,
o fabricated foam
o and packing foam;
· molded foam insulated container packing for commercial transportation, in international class 17; and
(2) The following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20: “The owner or holder/owner was using the mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods and/or services identified in the registration for which use of the mark in commerce is claimed, as evidenced by the submitted proof of use, during the relevant period for filing the affidavit of use.” 37 C.F.R. §§2.161(h), 7.37(h).
Additionally, you must identify the corresponding goods that each individual piece of evidence of current proof of use supports. See id.
To demonstrate acceptable proof of use for goods, the owner must submit photographs that show the mark on the actual goods or packaging, or photographs of displays associated with the actual goods at their point of sale. A tag or label that is not shown affixed to the goods is not acceptable proof of use. Similarly, a package that does not show or identify the goods therein is not acceptable proof of use.
Form Declaration
Please note that the below statement verifying proof of use is slightly different than the standard substitute specimen statement.
The following statement and declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20 can be used to verify the use of the mark as evidenced by the submitted item(s) showing proof of use, if properly signed and dated:
The owner or holder/owner was using the mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods and/or services identified in the registration for which use of the mark in commerce is claimed, as evidenced by the submitted proof of use and specimen(s), during the relevant period for filing the affidavit of use.
The signatory being warned that willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. §1001, and that such willful false statements and the like may jeopardize the validity of this submission, declares that the facts set forth above are true; all statements made of his/her own knowledge are true; and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true.
__________________________
Signature of Authorized Person
__________________________
Type or Print Name
__________________________
Date
WARNING:
If the owner responds with unacceptable proof of use for any goods queried, the Office will delete these goods from the registration.
Detailed information regarding the audit program is provided on the following webpage – http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks-maintaining-trademark-registration/post-registration-audit-program.
A complete response must be received within 6 months from the issuance date of this Office action.
The owner must respond to all inquiries set forth in this Office action to avoid cancellation of the registration.
If a response is not received, the registration will be cancelled in its entirety. 37 C.F.R. §2.163(b)-(c); TMEP §1604.16.
How to respond. Click to file a Response to Post-Registration Office action.
Direct questions about this Office action to the Post Registration staff member below.
Phillip White D.
/Phillip D. White/
Program Analyst
OTQRT
571-272-9665
phillip.white@uspto.gov (inquiries only)
RESPONSE GUIDANCE
· Response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period. TEAS maintenance or unforeseen circumstances could affect an owner’s ability to timely respond.
· Responses signed by an unauthorized party are not accepted or processed. If the owner does not have an attorney, the response must be signed by the individual owner, all joint owners, or someone with legal authority to bind a juristic owner. If the owner has an attorney, the response must be signed by the attorney.
· If needed, find contact information for the supervisor of the office or unit listed in the signature block.