WOOFLE
Janene Bray
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 85338381 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Attorney Name | Thomas F. Lebens |
| Attorney Docket Number | 7335-100103- |
| Law Office Assigned | M10 |
| Employee Name | HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KI |
Timeline
| 2011-06-05 | Application Filed |
| 2015-03-31 | Abandon |
| 2015-04-27 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2015-04-27 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Janene Bray |
| Address | 5600 Hole In One Drive Prescott AZ US 86301 |
| Legal Entity Type | Individual |
| Legal Entity State | US |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 21 |
| U.S. Codes: | 002,013,023,029,030,033,040,050 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0211 | NON- ELECTRIC WAFFLE IRON FOR DOG TREATS |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2011-06-08 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2011-06-09 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2011-08-09 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2011-08-15 | 4 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2011-08-16 | 5 CNRT F:First Action |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2012-02-15 | 6 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2012-02-15 | 7 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2012-02-15 | 8 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2012-02-15 | 9 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2012-02-16 | 10 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | 2012-03-12 | 11 CNSL R:Renewal |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 2012-03-12 | 12 CNSL S: |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2012-09-12 | 13 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2012-09-13 | 14 RCSC S: |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2013-03-20 | 15 RCSC S: |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2013-09-25 | 16 RCSC S: |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2014-03-26 | 17 RCSC S: |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2014-06-06 | 18 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2014-09-26 | 19 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2014-09-29 | 20 CNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2015-04-27 | 21 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2015-04-27 | 22 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Company Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
 WOOFLE 85338381 not registered Dead/Abandoned |
Janene Bray 2011-06-05 |
 WOOFLE 75041525 not registered Dead/Abandoned |
Seidel, Nancy B. 1996-01-11 |
 WOOFLE 72274746 0851841 Dead/Cancelled |
ITEMS, INCORPORATED 1967-06-26 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 