ADAMS
W. T. Adams & Co.
Application Filed: 2010-04-15
Trademark Application Details
ABANDONED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 85015200 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Attorney Name | Albert A. Chapar, Jr. |
| Law Office Assigned | L40 |
| Employee Name | PARK, JENNY K |
Timeline
| 1979-08-10 | Date of First Use |
| 2010-04-15 | Application Filed |
| 2013-10-08 | Abandon |
| 2013-10-08 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2013-10-09 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  W. T. Adams & Co. |
| Address | 458 Cherokee Avenue, S.E. Atlanta GA 303123205 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | GA |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 36 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101,102 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0361 | Commercial and residential real estate agency services |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2010-04-19 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2010-04-20 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2010-07-22 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2010-07-28 | 4 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2010-07-28 | 5 GNRT F:First Action |
| NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2010-07-28 | 6 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2011-01-24 | 7 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2011-01-24 | 8 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2011-01-25 | 9 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2011-02-22 | 10 CNFR R:Renewal |
| FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2011-02-22 | 11 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | 2011-02-22 | 12 GNFN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2011-04-12 | 13 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2011-04-12 | 14 GNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2011-04-12 | 15 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2011-06-04 | 16 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2011-06-04 | 17 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2011-06-04 | 18 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2011-06-30 | 19 CFRC R:Renewal |
| SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | 2011-06-30 | 20 GNSF O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | 2011-06-30 | 21 GNS1 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | 2011-12-06 | 22 EXAF T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | 2011-12-06 | 23 EXPI T:TTAB Proceeding |
| JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2012-02-06 | 24 JURT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EXAMINERS REQUEST FOR REMAND TO TTAB | 2012-03-30 | 25 RMDT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2012-04-05 | 26 JURT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2012-04-20 | 27 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2012-04-20 | 28 GNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2012-04-20 | 29 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2012-05-25 | 30 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2012-06-07 | 31 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2012-06-14 | 32 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2012-06-14 | 33 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2012-07-10 | 34 CFRC R:Renewal |
| SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | 2012-07-10 | 35 GNSF O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | 2012-07-10 | 36 GNS1 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | 2012-09-25 | 37 ERFR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2012-09-25 | 38 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2012-09-25 | 39 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXPARTE APPEAL DSMSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | 2013-01-08 | 40 EXFB T:TTAB Proceeding |
| JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2013-01-28 | 41 JURT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | 2013-03-15 | 42 CNES R:Renewal |
| EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | 2013-03-15 | 43 GNES O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | 2013-03-15 | 44 GNSN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | 2013-04-23 | 45 RBFT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | 2013-07-25 | 46 EXPA T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | 2013-10-08 | 47 EXPT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2013-10-08 | 48 ABN3 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2013-10-09 | 49 MAB3 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 