PERMAFROST
Papeterie Zuber Rieder
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 79356253 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
Timeline
| 2022-10-07 | Application Filed |
| 2022-12-01 | Location: INITIAL REVIEW/SERIALIZATION BRANCH(MAILROOM) |
| 2022-12-01 | Status: Live/Pending |
| 2022-12-06 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  PAPETERIE ZUBER RIEDER |
| Entity Statement | SAS |
| Address | Rue Ernest Zuber F-25320 BOUSSIERES FR |
| Legal Entity Type | |
| Legal Entity State | FR |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 16 |
| U.S. Codes: | 002,005,022,023,029,037,038,050 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0161 | Paper and cardboard; labels of paper; printed matter; bookbinding material; photographs; stationery and office requisites, excluding furniture; adhesives for stationery, namely, adhesive materials; drawing material and material for artists; paintbrushes; instructional or teaching material, except apparatus; paper sheets, films and bags for wrapping and packaging; printing blocks |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | 2022-12-01 | 1 REPR M: |
| LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | 2022-12-01 | 2 LIMI I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2022-12-06 | 3 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | 2022-12-10 | 4 MAFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | 2023-04-17 | 5 COAR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2023-04-17 | 6 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2023-04-17 | 7 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | 2023-04-17 | 8 ECDR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2023-04-17 | 9 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | 2023-04-17 | 10 CHAN I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2023-07-24 | 11 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2023-08-02 | 12 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | 2023-08-03 | 13 RFCR E:E-Mail |
| NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | 2023-08-24 | 14 RFWR P: |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2023-08-30 | 15 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | 2023-08-31 | 16 RFCR E:E-Mail |
| REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | 2023-09-19 | 17 RFRR P: |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | 2023-09-19 | 18 RFCS P: |
| REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | 2023-10-10 | 19 RFNT P: |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2024-04-04 | 20 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2024-04-04 | 21 MAB2 E:E-Mail |
| NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | 2024-05-01 | 22 OPNR P: |
| NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | 2024-05-01 | 23 OPNS P: |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 