MULTIWAY
Multiway Robotics (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 79323138 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 3000: Illustration: Drawing or design which also includes word(s)/ letter(s)/number(s) |
Timeline
| 2021-08-18 | Application Filed |
| 2021-10-22 | Location: INITIAL REVIEW/SERIALIZATION BRANCH(MAILROOM) |
| 2021-10-22 | Status: Live/Pending |
| 2021-10-25 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Multiway Robotics (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. |
| Address | 601, Building 1, Hengtaiyu Building, Tangwei Community, Fenghuang Street, Guangming District, Shenzhen City Guangdong Province CN |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | CN |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Design Search Codes
| 280103 | Japanese and Chinese characters; Chinese characters; Japanese characters |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 7 |
| U.S. Codes: | 013,019,021,023,024,031,034,035 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0071 | Lifts, other than ski-lifts; lifting apparatus; elevating apparatus; conveyors [machines]; industrial robots; handling machines, automatic [manipulators]; starters for motors and engines; machines and apparatus for cleaning, electric |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | 2021-10-22 | 1 REPR M: |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2021-10-25 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | 2021-10-29 | 3 MAFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2022-05-20 | 4 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2022-05-20 | 5 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | 2022-05-21 | 6 RFCR E:E-Mail |
| REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | 2022-05-27 | 7 RFRR P: |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | 2022-05-27 | 8 RFCS P: |
| REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | 2022-06-22 | 9 RFNT P: |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2022-11-15 | 10 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2022-11-15 | 11 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2022-11-16 | 12 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2022-12-12 | 13 CNRT R:Renewal |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2022-12-12 | 14 GNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2022-12-12 | 15 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | 2022-12-18 | 16 NREP P: |
| REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | 2023-01-09 | 17 RFNT P: |
| NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | 2023-03-22 | 18 OPNR P: |
| NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | 2023-03-22 | 19 OPNS P: |
| NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | 2023-04-12 | 20 OPNX P: |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2023-06-27 | 21 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2023-06-27 | 22 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2023-06-27 | 23 MAB2 E:E-Mail |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 